Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia

ABSTRACT

In 2012, Wikipedia was the sixth-most visited website on the Internet. Being one of the main repositories of knowledge, students from all over the world consult it. But, around 10% of these students have dyslexia, which impairs their access to text-based websites. How could Wikipedia be presented to be more readable for this target group? In an experiment with 28 participants with dyslexia, we compare reading speed, comprehension, and subjective readability for the font sizes 10, 12, 14, 18, 22, and 26 points, and line spacings 0.8, 1.0, 1.4, and 1.8. The results show that font size has a significant effect on the readability and the understandability of the text, while line spacing does not. On the basis of our results, we recommend using 18-point font size when designing web text for readers with dyslexia. Our results significantly differ from previous recommendations, presumably, because this is the first work to cover a wide range of values and to study them in the context of an actual website.

References

1. A. Al-Wabil, P. Zaphiris, and S. Wilson. Web navigation for individuals with dyslexia: an exploratory study. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pages 593--602, 2007.
2. Alexa Internet. Top 500, February 2013. http://www.alexa.com/topsites.
3. R. Baeza-Yates and L. Rello. Estimating dyslexia in the Web. In Proc. W4A 2011, pages 1--4, Hyderabad, India, March 2011. ACM Press.
4. J. Banerjee, D. Majumdar, M. S. Pal, and D. Majumdar. Readability, subjective preference and mental workload studies on young indian adults for selection of optimum font type and size during onscreen reading. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences, 4:131--143, 2011.
5. M. Bernard, C. H. Liao, and M. Mills. The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '01, pages 175--176, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
6. D. Beymer, D. M. Russell, and P. Z. Orton. An eye tracking study of how font size, font type, and pictures influence online reading. Proceedings INTERACT 2007, pages 456--460, 2007.
7. J. Bradford. Designing web pages for dyslexic readers, 2011. http://www.dyslexia-parent.com/mag35.html.
8. British Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia style guide, January 2012. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/.
9. G. Buscher, R. Biedert, D. Heinesch, and A. Dengel. Eye tracking analysis of preferred reading regions on the screen. In Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3307--3312. ACM, 2010.
10. B. Caldwell, M. Cooper, L. G. Reid, and G. Vanderheiden. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. WWW Consortium (W3C), 2008.
11. Col·legi de Logopedes de Catalunya. PRODISCAT Protocol de detecció i actuació en la dislèxia. Àmbit Educativo. Departament d'Ensenyament de la Generalitat de Catalunya, 2011.
12. V. de Santana, R. de Oliveira, L. Almeida, and M. Baranauskas. Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In Proc. W4A '12, page 35. ACM, 2012.
13. A. Dickinson, P. Gregor, and A. Newell. Ongoing investigation of the ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics can be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proceedings of the fifth international ACM Conference on Assistive technologies (ASSETS), pages 97--103, July 2002.
14. M. Dixon. Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pages 647--656, 2007.
15. L. Evett and D. Brown. Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers-clear text for all. Interacting with Computers, 17:453--472, 2005.
16. P. Gregor and A. F. Newell. An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques. In Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, ASSETS 2000, pages 85--91, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.
17. R. Hillier. A typeface for the adult dyslexic reader. PhD thesis, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge and Chelmsford, UK, 2006.
18. J. Hyönä and R. Olson. Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6):1430, 1995.
19. Interagency Commission on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Report to the U.S. Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, U.S., 1987.
20. S. Kurniawan and G. Conroy. Comparing comprehension speed and accuracy of online information in students with and without dyslexia. Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pages 257--70, 2006.
21. J. E. McCarthy and S. J. Swierenga. What we know about dyslexia and web accessibility: a research review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9:147--152, June 2010.
22. J. Nielsen. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. Last visited Feb 22, 2013, 2006.
23. J. Nielsen. Lower-literacy users, 2012. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050314.html.
24. J. Nielsen and K. Pernice. Eyetracking web usability. New Riders Pub, 2010.
25. M. Pedley. Designing for dyslexics: Part 3 of 3, 2006. http://accessites.org/site/2006/11/designing-for-dyslexics-part-3-of-3.
26. P. Rainger. A dyslexic perspective on e-content accessibility, 2012. www.texthelp.com/media/39360/USDyslexiaAndWebAccess.PDF.
27. K. Rayner and S. Duffy. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3):191--201, 1986.
28. L. Rello and R. Baeza-Yates. The presence of English and Spanish dyslexia in the Web. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 8:131--158, 2012.
29. L. Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, L. Dempere, and H. Saggion. Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.
30. L. Rello, S. Bautista, R. Baeza-Yates, P. Gervás, R. Hervás, and H. Saggion. One half or 50%? An eye-tracking study of number representation readability. In Proc. INTERACT '13, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013.
31. L. Rello, G. Kanvinde, and R. Baeza-Yates. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proc. W4A '12, Lyon, France, April 2012. ACM Press.
32. A. D. Shaikh. The effects of line length on reading online news. Usability News, 7(2):1--4, 2005.
33. Tobii Technology. Product description Tobii 50 Series, 2005.
34. V. Zarach. Ten guidelines for improving accessibility for people with dyslexia, 2012. CETIS University of Wales Bangor. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ten_Guidelines_for_Improving_Accessibility_for_People_with_Dyslexia.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Information systems

  • Information retrieval

  • Information storage systems