Doug Clow
ABSTRACT
Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) are growing substantially in numbers, and also in interest from the educational community. MOOCs offer particular challenges for what is becoming accepted as mainstream practice in learning analytics.
Partly for this reason, and partly because of the relative newness of MOOCs as a widespread phenomenon, there is not yet a substantial body of literature on the learning analytics of MOOCs. However, one clear finding is that drop-out/non-completion rates are substantially higher than in more traditional education.
This paper explores these issues, and introduces the metaphor of a 'funnel of participation' to reconceptualise the steep drop-off in activity, and the pattern of steeply unequal participation, which appear to be characteristic of MOOCs and similar learning environments. Empirical data to support this funnel of participation are presented from three online learning sites: iSpot (observations of nature), Cloudworks ('a place to share, find and discuss learning and teaching ideas and experiences'), and openED 2.0, a MOOC on business and management that ran between 2010--2012. Implications of the funnel for MOOCs, formal education, and learning analytics practice are discussed.
- Aczel, J., Cross, S., Meiszner, A., Hardy, P., McAndrew, P., and Clow, D. 2011. Some issues affecting the sustainability of open learning courses. EDEN 2011 Annual Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 19--22 June 2011.Google Scholar
- Anderson, C. 2006. The Long Tail: How endless choice is creating unlimited demand. London: Random House.Google Scholar
- Anderson, T. 2012. Interesting analysis of a c-MOOC. http://terrya.edublogs.org/2012/07/25/interesting-network-analysis-of-a-c-mooc/Google Scholar
- Arnold, K. E. 2010. Signals: Applying academic analytics. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33, 1.Google Scholar
- Arnold, K. E. & Pistilli, M. D. 2012. Course Signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashby, A. 2004. Monitoring student retention in the Open University: definition, measurement, interpretation and action. Open Learning, 19, 1, 65--77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bates, T. 2012. What's right and what's wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs. http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/Google Scholar
- Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social Learning Analytics. Ed. Tech. & Society, 15, 3, 3--26.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J. P., and Oblinger, D. G. 2007. Academic Analytics. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, October 2007.Google Scholar
- CBlissMath. 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_dIXNGVZnkGoogle Scholar
- Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., Newman, M. E. J. 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51(4), 661--703. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clow, D. 2012. The Learning Analytics Cycle: Closing the loop effectively. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clow, D., Cross, S., and McAndrew, P. (2012). Quality Assurance -- D7.3 Assessment Report. EU Deliverable: openED, 505667-LLP-1-2009-1-PT-KA3-KA3MP.Google Scholar
- Clow, D., and Makriyannis, E. 2011. iSpot Analysed: Participatory Learning and Reputation. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conole, G., Culver, J., Williams, P., Cross, S., Clark, P., and Brasher, A. 2008. Cloudworks: social networking for learning design. Proc. ascilite Melbourne 2008.Google Scholar
- Conole, G., and Culver, J. 2010. The design of Cloudworks: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Comput. Educ., 54(3), 679--692. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., and Vetvik, O. J. 2009. The consumer decision journey. McKinsey Quarterly, June 2009. http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Media_Entertainment/Publishing/The_consumer_decision_journey_2373#Google Scholar
- Daniel, J. 2012. Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/120925MOOCspaper2.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Downes, S., and others. 2011. The MOOC Guide https://sites.google.com/site/themoocguide/homeGoogle Scholar
- Dron, J., and Anderson, T. 2009. On the Design of Collective Applications. 2009 Int. Conf. on Computational Science and Engineering, 368--374. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Esposito, A. 2012. Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC. Electronic J. e-Learning 10, 3, 315--325.Google Scholar
- Essa, A., and Ayad, H. 2012. Student Success System: Risk Analytics and Data Visualization using Ensembles of Predictive Models. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ferguson, R. 2012. The state of learning analytics in 2012: a review and future challenges. Technical Report No. KMI-12-01, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/techreport/kmi-12-01Google Scholar
- Fini, A. 2009. The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools. IRRODL, 10, 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fournier, H., Kop, R., and Sitla, H. 2011. The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greller, W., and Drachsler, H. 2012. Translating Learning into Numbers: A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics. Ed. Tech. & Society, 15, 3, 42--57.Google Scholar
- Grau-Valldosera, J. and Minguillón, J. 2011. Redefining dropping out in online higher education: a case study from the UOC. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hill, P. 2012. Four Barriers That MOOCs Must Overcome To Build a Sustainable Model. http://mfeldstein.com/four-barriers-that-moocs-must-overcome-to-become-sustainable-modelGoogle Scholar
- Jobber, D. 1995. Principles and practice of marketing. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire.Google Scholar
- Kolowich, S. 2012. How will MOOCs make money? Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/11/experts-speculate-possible-business-models-mooc-providersGoogle Scholar
- Kop, R. 2011. The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course Analysis of Plenk2010. IRRODL, 12, 3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., and Mak, J. S. F. 2011. A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. IRRODL, 12, 7.Google Scholar
- Kop, R., and Hill, A. 2008. Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? IRRODL, 9, 3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Mak, S. F. J, Williams, R., and Mackness, J. 2010. Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Networked Learning. University of Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
- Makriyannis, E., and de Liddo, A., 2010. Fairy Rings of Participation: The invisible network influencing participation in online communities. Proc. 7th Conf. on Networked Learning. University of Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
- McAndrew, P., Scanlon, E., and Clow, D. 2010. An Open Future for Higher Education. Educause Quarterly, 33(1).Google Scholar
- McAulay, A., Stewart, B., and Siemens, G. 2010. The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Meiszner, A., 2011. The Why and How of Open Education. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands. http://unu.edu/news/book-the-why-and-how-of-open-education.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Meyer, R. 2012. What It's Like to Teach a MOOC (And What the Heck's a MOOC?). The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/what-its-like-to-teach-a-mooc-and-what-the-hecks-a-mooc/260000/XXXGoogle Scholar
- Noble, S. 2010 It's Time To Bury The Marketing Funnel. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2010/12/08/customer-life-cycle-leadership-cmo-network-funnel.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Pham, M. C., Derntl, M., Cao, Y., an Klamm, R. 2012. Learning Analytics for Learning Blogospheres, In. E. Popescu et al. (Eds.): ICWL 2012, LNCS 7558, 258--267. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preece, J., and Shneiderman, B. 2009. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation. AIS T. HCI. 1, 1, 13--32.Google Scholar
- Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. (2007). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia. 2007 Int. ACM Conf. on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, 259--268. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rahman, N. and Dron, J. 2012. Challenges and opportunities for learning analytics when formal teaching meets social spaces. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosen, R. J. 2012. Overblown-Claims-of-Failure Watch: How Not to Gauge the Success of Online Courses. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/overblown-claims-of-failure-watch-how-not-to-gauge-the-success-of-online-courses/260159/Google Scholar
- Rosewell, J. and Hirst, T. 2008 Equability and dominance in online forums. CALRG Conference, 18--19 June 2008. http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/document.cfm?docid=11627Google Scholar
- Sharples, M. et al. 2012. Innovating Pedagogy 2012: Open University Innovation Report 1. The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
- Shirky, C. 2003 Power Laws, Weblogs, and Inequality, http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Siemens, G. 2011. Duplication theory of educational value. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2011/09/15/duplication-theory-of-educational-value/Google Scholar
- Siemens, G. 2012. MOOCs are really a platform. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/Google Scholar
- Siemens, G., and Downes, S. 2008, 2009. Connectivism & connected knowledge: CCK08, CCK09. http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/Google Scholar
- Silvertown, J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 9, 467--471.Google ScholarCross Ref
- University of Phoenix. 2012. 2011 Academic Annual Report. http://www.phoenix.edu/about_us/publications/academic-annual-report.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- MOOCs and the funnel of participation
Recommendations
Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs
LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge ConferenceIn online learning environments, learners are often required to be more autonomous in their approach to learning. In scaled online learning environments, like Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), there are differences in the ability of learners to ...
Moving Through MOOCS: Pedagogy, Learning Design and Patterns of Engagement
Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked WorldAbstractMassive open online courses (MOOCs) are part of the lifelong learning experience of people worldwide. Many of these learners participate fully. However, the high levels of dropout on most of these courses are a cause for concern. Previous studies ...
A Literature Review on MOOCs Integrated With Learning Analytics
Although there have been numerous studies committed to MOOCs integrated with learning analytics, fewer of them have systematically reviewed the related literature. Using clustering techniques, bibliographic network visualization, content analysis, and ...
Comments