skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery: Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertising

Published:01 March 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Do online ads suggestive of arrest records appear more often with searches of black-sounding names than white-sounding names? What is a black-sounding name or white-sounding name, anyway? How many more times would an ad have to appear adversely affecting one racial group for it to be considered discrimination? Is online activity so ubiquitous that computer scientists have to think about societal consequences such as structural racism in technology design? If so, how is this technology to be built? Let’s take a scientific dive into online ad delivery to find answers.

References

  1. Barker R. 2003. The Social Work Dictionary (5th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. 2003. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha andJamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. NBER Working Paper No. 9873;.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York. 1980. Supreme Courtof the United States, 447 U.S. 557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R. 2011. Fairness through awareness.arXiv:1104.3913 {cs.CC}; http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3913.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2012. Consideration of arrest and convictionrecords in employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Washington,DC. 915.002; http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1978. Uniform guidelines on employee selectionprocedures. Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fryer, R., Levitt, S. 2004. The causes and consequences of distinctively black names. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 59(3); http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/FryerLevitt2004.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Glover, E; http://www.physiology.emory.edu/FIRST/ebony2.htm (archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google AdSense; http://google.com/adsense.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Google. Google announces first quarter 2011 financial results; http://investor.google.com/earnings/2011/Q1_google_earnings.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, P., Keller, K. 2005. Ex-offenders need not apply: the criminal background check in hiringdecisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21(1): 6-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination, National Research Council. 2004. Measuringracial discrimination. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pang, B., Lee, L. 2004. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivitysummarization based on minimum cuts. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association forComputational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Schneider, J. http://www.lehigh.edu/bio/jill.html (Archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sweeney, L. 2013. Discrimination in online ad delivery. (For detailed results and analysis, see full technical report archived at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. Data, including Web pages andads, archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 1970. Racism in America and how to combat it. Washington,DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. WebShot Command Line Server Edition. Version 1.9.1.1; http://www.websitescreenshots.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery: Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertising

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Queue
          Queue  Volume 11, Issue 3
          Storage
          March 2013
          38 pages
          ISSN:1542-7730
          EISSN:1542-7749
          DOI:10.1145/2460276
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Popular
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format