Leo Porter
Cynthia Bailey Lee
ABSTRACT
Peer Instruction (PI) is a teaching method that supports student-centric classrooms, where students construct their own understanding through a structured approach featuring questions with peer discussions. PI has been shown to increase learning in STEM disciplines such as physics and biology. In this report we look at another indicator of student success the rate at which students pass the course or, conversely, the rate at which they fail. Evaluating 10 years of instruction of 4 different courses spanning 16 PI course instances, we find that adoption of the PI methodology in the classroom reduces fail rates by a per-course average of 61% (20% reduced to 7%) compared to standard instruction (SI). Moreover, we also find statistically significant improvements within-instructor. For the same instructor teaching the same course, we find PI decreases the fail rate, on average, by 67% (from 23% to 8%) compared to SI. As an in-situ study, we discuss the various threats to the validity of this work and consider implications of wide-spread adoption of PI in computing programs.
- Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American J. of Physics 69, 2001.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, J. E. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education 6, 2007.Google Scholar
- Cutts, Q., Esper, S., and Simon, B. Computing as the 4th "R": a general education approach to computing education. Proc. 7th ICER, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, Moog RS, Platt T, Varma-Nelson P, White HB. Pedagogies of engagement in science. A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 36, 262--273, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Freeman S, O'Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, et al. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Science Education. 6:132--39. 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Knight, J. K., and Wood, W. B. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education 4, 2005.Google Scholar
- Lasry, N., Mazur, E., and Watkins, J. Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college," Am. J. Phys. 76 (11), 1066--1069, 2008.Google Scholar
- Pargas, R. P., and Shah, D. M. Things are clicking in computer science courses. Proc. of 37th SIGCSE, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Porter, L., Bailey-Lee, C., Simon, B., Cutts, Q., and Zingaro, D. Experience Report: A Multi-classroom Report on the Value of Peer Instruction. Pro. of 16th ITiCSE, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Porter, L., Bailey-Lee, C. Simon, B., Zingaro, D. Peer Instruction: Do Students Really Learn from Peer Discussion? In Proc. 7th ICER, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prepare and Inspire: K--12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future. Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., 2010.Google Scholar
- Simon, B. http://www.peerinstruction4cs.org/Google Scholar
- Simon, B., Kinnunen, P., Porter, L., Zazkis, D. Experience Report: CS1 for Majors with Media Computation. Proc. of 15th ITiCSE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon, B., Kohanfars, M., Lee, J, Tamayo, K., and Cutts, Q. Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. Proc. of 41st SIGCSE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spacco, J., Parris, J., Simon, B. How we teach impacts learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. Proc. of 44th SIGCSE, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- UBC Science Education Initiatives. Clicker Resource Guide, http://cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/clickers.htm.Google Scholar
- UBC Science Education Initiatives. Learning Goals, http://cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/learn_goals.htm.Google Scholar
- Zingaro, D. Experience report: Peer instruction in remedial computer science. Proc. of 22nd Ed-Media, 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses
Recommendations
Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?
ICER '11: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education researchPeer Instruction (PI) is an instructional approach that engages students in constructing their own understanding of concepts. Students individually respond to a question, discuss with peers, and respond to the same question again. In general, the peer ...
A Comparison of Peer Instruction and Collaborative Problem Solving in a Computer Architecture Course
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationWhile substantial research has demonstrated that active learning pedagogies are better for learning than passive lectures, we need to understand the trade-offs between different active learning pedagogies. Computer Architecture at Midwestern University ...
Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction classroom
ICER '13: Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education researchAlthough studies have shown Peer Instruction (PI) in computing courses to be beneficial for learning and retention, study of the student experience has been limited to attitudinal survey results. This study provides a preliminary evaluation of student ...
Comments