skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis

Published:01 April 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The main applications and challenges of one of the hottest research areas in computer science.

References

  1. Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M. and Taboada, M. Cross-linguistic sentiment analysis: From English to Spanish. In Proceedings of RANLP (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ding, X., Liu, B. and Yu, P.S. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ding, X., Liu, B. and Zhang, L. Entity discovery and assignment for opinion mining applications. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dragut, E.C., Yu, C., Sistla, P. and Meng, W. Construction of a sentimental word dictionary. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Du, W., Tan, S., Cheng, X. and Yun, X. Adapting information bottleneck method for automatic construction of domain-oriented sentiment lexicon. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Esuli, A. and Sebastiani, F. Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. In Proceedings of Conf. of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldman, R., Rosenfeld, B., Bar-Haim, R. and Fresko, M. the stock sonar---sentiment Analysis of Stocks Based on a Hybrid Approach. IAAI-12 (2011), 1642--1647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fellbaum, C.D. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Feng, S., Bose, R. and Choi, Y. Learning general connotation of words using graph-based algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2011). 1092--1103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hai, Z., Chang, K. and Kim, J-j. Implicit feature identification via co-occurrence association rule mining. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (2011), 393--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hatzivassiloglou, V. and K. McKeown, Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the Joint ACL/EACL Conference (1997), 174--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hu, M. and Liu, B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2004), 168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hu, M. and Liu, B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In Proceedings of AAAI (2004), 755--760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jakob, N. and Gurevych, I. Extracting opinion targets in a single-and cross-domain setting with conditional random fields. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jindal, N. and Liu, B. Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kamps, J., Marx, M., Mokken, R.J. and de Rijke, M. Using WordNet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. LREC, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, S.-M. and Hovy, E. Crystal: Analyzing predictive opinions on the Web. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A. and Pereira, F. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2001, 282--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lin, D. Minipar; http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/lindek/minipar.htm. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, B., Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing. N. Indurkhya and F.J. Damerau, eds. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Loughran, T. and Mcdonald, B. When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance 66, 1 (2011), 35--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mohammad, S.M. and Turney, P.D. Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Narayanan, R., Liu, B. and Choudhary, A. Sentiment analysis of conditional sentences. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Singapore, 2009). Association for Computational Linguistics, 180--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Netzer, O., Feldman, R., Fresko, M. and Goldenberg, Y. Mine your own business: Market structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Science, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pang, B. and Lee, L. A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis using Subjectivity Summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2004), 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pang, B. and Lee, L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2, 1-2 (2008), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pang, B., Lee, L. and Vaithyanathan, S. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of EMNLP-02, 7th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Philadelphia, PA, 2002). Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Peng, W. and Park, D.H. Generate adjective sentiment dictionary for social media sentiment analysis using constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Popescu, A.-M. and Etzioni, O. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J. and Chen, C. Opinion word expansion and target extraction through double propagation. Computational Linguistics 37, 1 (2011), 9--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Riloff, E. and Wiebe, J. Learning extraction patterns for subjective eExpressions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Stone, P. The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Journal of Regional Science 8, 1 (1968).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Taboada, M., J. Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K. and Stede, M. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 37, 2 (2011), 267--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tsur, O., Davidov, D. and Rappoport, A. A great catchy name: semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Turney, P. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2002), 417--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wan, X. Using bilingual knowledge and ensemble techniques for unsupervised Chinese sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Honolulu, Hawaii, 2008). Association for Computational Linguistics, 553--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J. and Hoffmann, P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2005), 347--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wu, Y., Zhang, Q. Huang, X. and Wu, L. Phrase dependency parsing for opinion mining. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Yu, H. and Hatzivassiloglou, V. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Communications of the ACM
        Communications of the ACM  Volume 56, Issue 4
        April 2013
        90 pages
        ISSN:0001-0782
        EISSN:1557-7317
        DOI:10.1145/2436256
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Popular
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format