skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

A Decade of OS Access-control Extensibility: Open source security foundations for mobile and embedded devices

Published:18 January 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

To discuss operating system security is to marvel at the diversity of deployed access-control models: Unix and Windows NT multiuser security; Type Enforcement in SELinux; anti-malware products; app sandboxing in Apple OS X, Apple iOS, and Google Android; and application-facing systems such as Capsicum in FreeBSD. This diversity is the result of a stunning transition from the narrow 1990s Unix and NT status quo to ’security localization’ - the adaptation of operating-system security models to site-local or product-specific requirements.

References

  1. Abrams, M. D., Eggers, K. W., LaPadula, L. J., Olson, I. M. 1990. A generalized framework for access control: an informal description. In Proceedings of the 13th NIST-NCSC National Computer Security Conference: 135-143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. P. 1972. Computer Security Technology Planning Study. Technical report, Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple Inc. 2007. Kernel authorization. Technical Note TN2127; http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2005/tn2127.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Badger, L., Sterne, D. F., Sherman, D. L., Walker, K. M., Haghighat, S. A. 1995. Practical domain and type enforcement for Unix. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy: 66. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bell, D. E., and L. J. LaPadula. 1973. Secure computer systems: mathematical foundations and model. Technical Report M74-244. Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Biba, K. 1977. Integrity considerations for secure computer systems. Technical Report TR-3153. Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boebert, W. E., Kain, R. Y. 1985. A practical alternative to hierarchical integrity policies. In Proceedings of the 8th National Computer Security Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantrill, B. M., Shapiro, M. W., Leventhal, A. H. 2004. Dynamic instrumentation of production systems. In Proceedings of the Usenix Annual Technical Conference, Berkeley, CA. Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fraser, T., Badger, L., Feldman, M. 1999. Hardening COTS software with generic software wrappers. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleiman, S. R. 1986. Vnodes: an architecture for multiple file system types in Sun Unix. In Proceedings of the Summer 1986 Usenix Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Loscocco, P. A., Smalley, S. D. 2001. Integrating flexible support for security policies into the Linux operating system. In Proceedings of the Usenix Annual Technical Conference: 29-42. Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. McKusick, M. K., Neville-Neil, G. V. 2004. The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System. Pearson Education. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Neumann, P. G., Boyer, R. S., Feiertag, R. J., Levitt, K. N., Robinson, L. 1980. A provably secure operating system: the system, its applications, and proofs, second edition. Technical Report CSL-116. Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ott, A. 2010. Rule-set-based access control (RSBAC) for Linux; http://www.rsbac.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Saltzer, J. H., Schroeder, M. D. 1975. The protection of information in computer systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 63(9): 1278-1308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sebes, E. J. 1991. Overview of the architecture of Distributed Trusted Mach. In Proceedings of the Usenix Mach Symposium: 20-22. Usenix Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Spencer, R., Smalley, S., Loscocco, P., Hibler, M., Andersen, D., Lepreau, J. 1999. The Flask security architecture: system support for diverse security policies. In Proceedings of the 8th Usenix Security Symposium: 123-139. Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vance, C., Miller, T. C., Dekelbaum, R., Reisse, A. 2007. Security-enhanced Darwin: porting SELinux to Mac OS X. In Proceedings from the Third Annual Security Enhanced Linux Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Watson, R. N. M. Exploiting concurrency vulnerabilities in system call wrappers. In Proceedings of the First Usenix Workshop on Offensive Technologies: 1-8. (2009) Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Watson, R. N. M. 2012. New approaches to operating system security extensibility. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-818. University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Watson, R. N. M., Anderson, J., Laurie, B., Kennaway, K. 2010. Capsicum: practical capabilities for Unix. In Proceedings of the 19th Usenix Security Symposium. Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Watson, R. N. M. Feldman, B., Migus, A., Vance, C. 2003. Design and implementation of the TrustedBSD MAC Framework. In Proceedings of the Third DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exhibition (DISCEX). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wright, C., Cowan, C., Morris, J., Smalley, S., Kroah-Hartman, G. 2002. Linux security modules: general security support for the Linux kernel. In Proceedings of the 11th Usenix Security Symposium. Usenix Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Decade of OS Access-control Extensibility: Open source security foundations for mobile and embedded devices
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Queue
            Queue  Volume 11, Issue 1
            Web Development
            January 2013
            51 pages
            ISSN:1542-7730
            EISSN:1542-7749
            DOI:10.1145/2428616
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 January 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Popular
            • Editor picked

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format