skip to main content
10.1145/2399016.2399046acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places

Published:14 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Civic engagement systems to date frequently focus on purely rational aspects of deliberation void of emotions. In order to empower youth in a largely immigrant and lower-income neighborhood, we designed a location-based storytelling and story experiencing system for web-enabled mobile phones. The system is based on a novel concept of pervasive play where stories emerge and develop on several dimensions -- most notably for our design a geographical one. This system functions as a research instrument in this paper. Through a qualitative analysis of the comments made through the system, we find (1) memories, feelings, and attitudes to be prime means of expression for youth, (2) the expression of such personal emotions leading to civic discussions, and (3) such discussions expanding over geographic areas in the neighborhood. Consequently, we argue for an approach to locative civic engagement systems that takes a vantage point in youth's emotions rather than a very rational and dry approach to deliberation.

References

  1. Adelman, C. Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research. Educational Action Research 1, 1 (1993), 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, B. Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24, 5 (2006), 733--752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ballagas, R. A., Kratz, S. G., Borchers, J., Yu, E., Walz, S. P., Fuhr, C. O., Hovestadt, L. and Tann, M. REXplorer: a mobile, pervasive spell-casting game for tourists. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1929--1934. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barber, B. R. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benford, S., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Rowland, D., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Row-Farr, J., Oldroyd, A., and Sutton, J. Uncle Roy All Around You: Implicating the city in a location-based performance. Proc. ACE 2004, ACM Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., and Rodden, T. From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 709--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bentley, F. and Basapur, S. StoryPlace.me: The path from studying elder communication to a public location-based video service. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 777--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Blast Theory. Rider Spoke. http://www.blasttheory.co.uk/bt/work_rider_spoke.html (Last accessed July 26, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N. G., Bødker, S., Korn, M., and Zander, P. O. Public Deliberation in Municipal Planning: Supporting Action and Reflection with Mobile Technology. Proc. C&T 2011, ACM Press (2011), 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Boler, M. Feeling Power. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Debord, G. Theory of the Dérive. Internationale Situationniste #2 (1958), 50--54. Available at http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/2.derive.htm (Last accessed July 26, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Espinoza, F., Persson, P., Sandin, A., Nyström, H., Cacciatore, E., and Bylund, M. GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information Systems. Proc. Ubicomp 2001, Springer (2001), 2--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gastil, J. Political Communication and Deliberation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaver, W. W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions 11, 5 (2004), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grudin, J. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (January 1994), 92--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. Participatory Action Research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005, 559--603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lombardo, V. and Damiano, R. Storytelling on mobile devices for cultural heritage. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 18, 1--2 (2012), 11--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Montola, M., Stenros, J. and Waern, A. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, USA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rowland, D., Flintham, M., Oppermann, L., Marshall, J., Chamberlain, A., Koleva, B., Benford, S., and Perez, C. Ubikequitous computing: designing interactive experiences for cyclists. Proc. MobileHCI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 21:1--21:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. de Sousa, R. The Rationality of Emotion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thrift, N. Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86, 1 (2004), 57--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallis, J., Rilstone, A., and Lambert, R. Once Upon a Time. http://www.atlas-games.com/onceuponatime/, 1995 (Last accessed July 26, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Talking it further: from feelings and memories to civic discussions in and about places

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design
      October 2012
      834 pages
      ISBN:9781450314824
      DOI:10.1145/2399016

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '12 Paper Acceptance Rate84of341submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader