skip to main content
10.5555/2390470.2390490dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 U.S. presidential election cycle

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 July 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a system for real-time analysis of public sentiment toward presidential candidates in the 2012 U.S. election as expressed on Twitter, a micro-blogging service. Twitter has become a central site where people express their opinions and views on political parties and candidates. Emerging events or news are often followed almost instantly by a burst in Twitter volume, providing a unique opportunity to gauge the relation between expressed public sentiment and electoral events. In addition, sentiment analysis can help explore how these events affect public opinion. While traditional content analysis takes days or weeks to complete, the system demonstrated here analyzes sentiment in the entire Twitter traffic about the election, delivering results instantly and continuously. It offers the public, the media, politicians and scholars a new and timely perspective on the dynamics of the electoral process and public opinion.

References

  1. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1--8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Choy, M., Cheong, L. F. M., Ma, N. L., & Koo, P. S. (2011). A sentiment analysis of Singapore Presidential Election 2011 using Twitter data with census correction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. González-Ibáñez, R., Muresan, S., & Wacholder, N. (2011). Identifying Sarcasm in Twitter: A Closer Look. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. IBM. (2012). InfoSphere Streams, from http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/infosphere/streams/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2010). Twitter: The Electoral Connection? Social Science Computer Review. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O'Connor, B., Krieger, M., & Ahn, D. (2010). TweetMotif: Exploratory Search and Topic Summarization for Twitter. In Proceedings of the the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1--2), 1--135. doi: 10.1561/1500000011 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pew Research Center. (2011). 13% of online adults use Twitter. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/Twitter%20Update%202011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. TweetCongress. (2012). Congress Members on Twitter Retrieved Mar 18, 2012, from http://tweetcongress.org/members/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Twitter. (2012). What is Twitter Retrieved Mar 18, 2012, from https://business.twitter.com/en/basics/what-is-twitter/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Is the voter only a tweet away? Micro blogging during the 2009 European Parliament election campaign in the Netherlands. First Monday {Online}, 16(8).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zeitzoff, T. (2011). Using Social Media to Measure Conflict Dynamics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 938--969. doi: 10.1177/0022002711408014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACL '12: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations
    July 2012
    186 pages
    • Conference Chair:
    • Min Zhang

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 July 2012

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate85of443submissions,19%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader