skip to main content
10.1145/237170.237272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Reconstructing curved surfaces from specular reflection patterns using spline surface fitting of normals

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1996Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.ALTSCHULER, M., ALTSCHULER, B., AND TABOADA, J. Laser electrooptic system for rapid three-dimensional (3-D) topographic mapping of surfaces. Optical Engineering 20, 6 (1981), 953-961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.BARSKY, B. A., MANDELL, R. B., AND KLEIN, S. A. Corneal shape illusion in keratoconus. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 36 Suppl.:5308 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.BARTELS, R. H., BEATTY, J. C., AND BARSKY, B. A. An Introduction to @lines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.BELIN, M. W., LITOFF, D., AND STRODS, S. J. The PAR technology corneal topography system. Refract Corneal Surg 8 (1992), 88- 96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.BLAKE, A., AND ZISSERMAN, A. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.BOLLE, R., AND VEMURI, B. On three-dimensional surface reconstruction methods. IEEE Trans. PAMI 11, 8, 840-858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.BRINKLEY, J. Knowledge-driven ultrasonic three-dimensional organ modeling. IEEE Trans. PAMI 7, 4, 431-441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.CHENG, F., AND BARSKY, B. A. Interproximation: Interpolation and approximation using cubic spline curves. Computer-Aided Design 23, 10 (1991), 700-706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.COHEN, E., LYCHE, T., AND RIESENFELD, R. Discrete B-splines and subdivision techniques in computer aided geometric design and computer graphics. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 14 (1980), 87-111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.Doss, J. D., HUTSON, R. L., ROWSEY, J. J., AND BROWN, D. R. Method for calculation of corneal profile and power distribution. Arch Ophthalmol 99 (1981), 1261-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.FAVARDIN, C. Determination automatique de structures geometriques destinees a la reconstruction de courbes et de surfaces a partir de donnees ponctuelles. PhD thesis, Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.GOSHTASBY, A. Surface reconstruction from scattered measuremeAts. SPIN 1830 (1992), 247-256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.HOPPE, H., DEROSE, T., DUCHAMP, T., HALSTEAD, M., JIN, H., MCDONALD, J., SCHWEITZER, J., AND W., S. Piecewise smooth surface reconstruction. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '94 Proceedings) (July 1994), 295-302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.JARVIS. A perspective on range finding techniques for computer vision. IEEE Trans. PAMI 5, 2 (1983), 122-139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.KLYCE, S.D. Computer-assisted corneal topography, highresolution graphic presentation and analysis of keratoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25 (1984), 1426-35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.KOCH, D. D., FOULKS, G. N., AND MORAN, T. The corneal eyesys system: accuracy, analysis and reproducibility of first generation prototype. Refract Corneal Surg 5 (1989), 424-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.KRACHMER, J. H., FEDER, R. S., AND BELIN, M. W. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv. Ophthalmol 28, 4 (1984), 293-322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.MAGUIRE, L. J., AND BOURNE, W. D. Corneal topography of early keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 108 (1989), 107-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.MAMMONE, R. J., GERSTEN, M., GORMLEY, D. J., KOPLIN, R. S., AND LUBKIN, V. L. 3-D corneal modeling system. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 37 (1990), 66-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.MOORE, D., AND WARREN, J. Approximation of dense scattered data using algebraic surfaces. Tech. rep., TR 90-135, Rice University, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.PRATT, V. Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. SIC- GRAPH '87 Conference Proceedings (1987), 145-152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.SATO, Y., KITAGAWA, H., AND FUJITA, H. Shape measurement of curved objects using multiple slit-ray projections. IEEE Trans. PAMI g, 6 (1982), 641-649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.SCHMITT, F., BARSKY, B. n., AND DU, W.-H. An adaptive subdivision method for surface fitting from sampled data. SIGGRAPH '86 Conference Proceedings (1986), 179-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.TAUBIN, G. An improved algorithm for algebraic curve and surface fitting. In Proc. gth International Conf. on Comp. Vision, Berlin (1993), pp. 658-665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.TERZOPOLOUS, D. Regularization of inverse visual problems involving discontinuities. IEEE Trans. PAMI 8 (1986), 413-424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.TOPA, L., AND SCHALKOFF, R. An analytical approach to the determination of planar surface orientation using active-passive image pairs. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 35 (1994), 404-418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.TURK, G., AND LEVOY, M. Zippered polygon meshes from range images. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '9g Proceedings) (1994), 311-318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.VaN SaaRLOOS, P. P., aND CONSTABLE, I. Improved method for calculation of corneal topography for any photokeratoscope geometry. Optom Vis Sci 68 (1991), 960-6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. 29.WANG, J., RICE, D. A., AND KLYCE, S. D. A new reconstruction algorithm for improvement of corneal topographical analysis. Refract. Corneal Surg 5 (1989), 379-387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.WARNICKI, J. W., REHKOPF, P. G., AND CURTIN, S. n. Corneal topography using computer analyzed rasterographic images. Am. J. Opt 27 (1988), 1125-1140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.WILSON, S. E., AND KLYCE, S. D. Advances in the analysis of corneal topography. Surv. Ophthalmol. 35 (1991), 269-277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reconstructing curved surfaces from specular reflection patterns using spline surface fitting of normals

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    SIGGRAPH '96: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
                    August 1996
                    528 pages
                    ISBN:0897917464
                    DOI:10.1145/237170

                    Copyright © 1996 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 1 August 1996

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    SIGGRAPH '96 Paper Acceptance Rate52of247submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

                    Upcoming Conference

                    SIGGRAPH '24

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader