How do professionals who create computing technologies consider accessibility?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present survey findings about how user experience (UX) and human-computer interaction (HCI) professionals, who create information and communication technologies (ICTs), reported considering accessibility in their work. Participants (N = 199) represented a wide range of job titles and nationalities. We found that most respondents (87%, N = 173) reported that accessibility was important or very important in their work; however, when considerations for accessibility were discussed in an open-ended question (N =185) the scope was limited. Additionally, we found that aspects of empathy and professional experience were associated with how accessibility considerations were reported. We also found that many respondents indicated that decisions about accessibility were not in their control. We argue that a better understanding about how accessibility is considered by professionals has implications for academic programs in HCI and UX as to how well programs are preparing students to consider and advocate for inclusive design.

References

1. Brown, L. 2008. Enabling Disabled Shoppers. Interent Retailer. Retrieved April 30, 2012 from http://disability-marketing.com/facts/.
2. Chisholm, W. and May, M. 2009.Universal Design for Web Applications. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, USA.
3. The Rehabilitation Act Amendments. Retrieved April 30, 2012 from http://www.access-board.gov/508.htm.
4. Disabled Persons' Telecommunications Access: Section 255. Retrieved June 18, 2012 from http://www.fcc.gov/guides/disabled-persons-telecommunications-access-section-255.
5. Burks, M. and Waddell, C. 2001. Universal Design for the Internet. The Internet Society Retrieved April 30, 2012 http://www.isoc.org/briefings/002/.
6. W3C. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). Retrieved April 30, 2012 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/.
7. National Federation for the Blind v. Target. Disability Rights Advocates, Retrieved April 28, 2012, from http://www.dralegal.org/cases/private_business/nfb_v_target
8. Cisneros, O. S. 2002. AOL Settles Accessibility Suit. WIRED Magazine. Retrieved April 28, 2012, from http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2000/07/37845.
9. Kane, S. K., Shulman, J. A. and Shockley, T. J. 2007. A Web Accessibility Report Card for Top International University Web Sites. In Proceedings of The International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, W4A (Baniff, Canada, May 7-8, 2007).
10. Loiacono, E. T., Nicholas C. Romano, J. and McCoy, S. 2009. The State of Corporate Website Accessibility. Communications of the ACM, 52, 9, 128 -- 132.
11. Huang, H., Kvasny, L., Joshi, K. D., Trauth, E. M. and Mahar, J. 2009. Synthesizing IT job skills identified in academic studies, practitioner publications and job ads. In Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system's 47th annual conference on Computer personnel research, SIGMIS-CPR'09 (Limerick, Ireland, May 28-30, 2009).
12. Nelson, H. J., Ahmad, A., Martin, N. L. and Litecky, C. R. 2007. A comparative study of IT/IS job skills and job definitions. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce (St.Louis, Missouri, USA, April 19-21, 2007).
13. Downey, J. 2006. Systems architect and systems analyst: are these comparable roles? In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future (Claremont, California, USA, April 13-15, 2006).
14. Anthony, E. 2003. Computing education in academia: toward differentiating the disciplines. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum (Lafayette, Indiana, USA, October 16-18. 2003).
15. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W. and Carey, T. 2002. A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice. Paper presented at the CHI 2002. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 20-25, 2002)
16. Gould, J. D. and Lewis, C. 1985. Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think. Communications of the ACM 28, 3, 300 -- 311.
17. Nahon, K., Benbasat, I. and Grange, C. 2012. The Missing Link: Intention to Produce Online Content Accessible to People with Disabilities by Non-Professionals. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Maui, HI, USA, January 4-7, 2012).
18. Trewin. S., Cragun, B., Swart, C., Brezin, J., and Richards, C., 2010. Accessibility challenges and tool features. Proceedings W4A2010 (Raleigh, NC, USA, April 26-27, 2010).
19. Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A. and Greenidge, K.-D. 2004. Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 269--288.
20. Putnam, C., and Kolko, B. (2012). HCI Professions: Differences and definitions. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (Austin, TX, USA, May 5-10)
21. Guralinik, D. B. 1976. Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language. William Collins and World Publishing, Cleveland, OH, USA.
22. Davis, M. H. 1980.A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
23. Davis M.H. 1983. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 44, 1,114--26.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing profession

      • Codes of ethics

      • Computing occupations