skip to main content
10.1145/2382936.2382990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Network-based classification of recurrent endometrial cancers using high-throughput DNA methylation data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

DNA methylation, a well-studied mechanism of epigenetic regulation, plays important roles in cancer. Increased levels of global DNA methylation is observed in primary solid tumors including endometrial carcinomas and is generally associated with silencing of tumor suppressor genes. The role of DNA methylation in cancer recurrence after therapeutic intervention is not clear. Here, we developed a novel computational method to analyze whole-genome DNA methylation data for endometrial tumors within the context of a human protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, in order to identify subnetworks as potential epigenetic biomarkers for predicting tumor recurrence. Our method consists of the following steps. First, differentially methylated (DM) genes between recurrent and non-recurrent tumors are identified and mapped onto a human PPI network. Then, a PPI subnetwork consisting of DM genes and genes that are topologically important for connecting the DMs on the PPI network, termed epigenetic connectors (ECs), are extracted using a Steiner-tree based algorithm. Finally, a random-walk based machine learning method is used to propagate the DNA methylation scores from the DMs to the ECs, which enables the ECs to be used as features in a support vector machine classifier for predicting recurrence. Remarkably, we found that while the DMs are not enriched in any cancer-related pathways, the ECs are enriched in many well-known tumorgenesis and metastasis pathways and include known epigenetic regulators. Moreover, combining the DMs and ECs significantly improves the prediction accuracy of cancer recurrence and outperforms several alternative methods. Therefore, the network-based method is effective in identifying gene subnetworks that are crucial both for the understanding and prediction of tumor recurrence.

References

  1. M.A. Shipp, K. N. Ross, P. Tamayo, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by geneexpression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat Med, 8:68--74, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Sorlie, C. M. Perou, R. Tibshirani, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98:10869--74, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Radivojac, K. Peng, W. T. Clark, et al. An integrated approach to inferring gene-disease associations in humans. Proteins, 72:1030--7, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T.H. Huang and M. Esteller. Chromatin remodeling in mammary gland differentiation and breast tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2:a004515, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Kulis and M. Esteller. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet, 70:27--56, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K. Dobbin and R. Simon. Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification. Biostatistics, 6:27--38, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. L. Ein-Dor, O. Zuk, and E. Domany. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103:5923--8, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Li, A. E. Lenferink, Y. Deng, et al. Identification of high-quality cancer prognostic markers and metastasis network modules. Nat Commun, 1:34, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M.L. Gatza, Joseph E. Lucas, William T. Barry, et al. A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:6994--6999, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Vidal, M. E. Cusick, and A. L. Barabasi. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell, 144:986--98, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A.L. Barabasi, N. Gulbahce, and J. Loscalzo. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet, 12:56--68, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E. Lee, Han-Yu Chuang, Jong-Won Kim, Trey Ideker, and Doheon Lee. Inferring pathway activity toward precise disease classification. PLoS Comput Biol, 4:e1000217+, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Keller, C. Backes, A. Gerasch, et al. A novel algorithm for detecting differentially regulated paths based on gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics, 25:2787--94, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y.A. Kim, S. Wuchty, and T. M. Przytycka. Identifying causal genes and dysregulated pathways in complex diseases. PLoS Comput Biol, 7:e1001095, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H Y Chuang, E Lee, Y T Liu, D Lee, and T Ideker. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol, 3:140, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Liu, A. Liberzon, S. W. Kong, et al. Network-based analysis of affected biological processes in type 2 diabetes models. PLoS Genet, 3:e96, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. T. Hwang, H. Sicotte, Ze Tian, et al. Robust and efficient identification of biomarkers by classifying features on graphs. Bioinformatics, 24:2023--2029, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J.H. Hung, T. W. Whitfield, T. H. Yang, et al. Identification of functional modules that correlate with phenotypic difference: the influence of network topology. Genome Biol, 11:R23, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. I. Ulitsky, A. Krishnamurthy, R. M. Karp, and R. Shamir. DEGAS: de novo discovery of dysregulated pathways in human diseases. PLoS One, 5:e13367, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S.A. Chowdhury, R. K. Nibbe, M. R. Chance, and M. Koyuturk. Subnetwork state functions define dys-regulated subnetworks in cancer. J Comput Biol, 18:263--281, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. L. Geistlinger, G. Csaba, R. Kuffner, N. Mulder, and R. Zimmer. From sets to graphs: towards a realistic enrichment analysis of transcriptomic systems. Bioinformatics, 27:i366--i373, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. F. Vandin, E. Upfal, and B. J. Raphael. Algorithms for detecting significantly mutated pathways in cancer. RECOMB'10, pages 506--521, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Dao, K. Wang, C. Collins, et al. Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy. Bioinformatics, 27:205--213, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C.S. Awtrey, M. G. Cadungog, Mario M. Leitao, et al. Surgical resection of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 102:480--8, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y.-W. Huang, J. Luo, Yu-I Weng, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of CIDEA, HAAO and RXFP3 associated with microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol, 117:239--247, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. T.A. Rauch and G. P. Pfeifer. Dna methylation profiling using the methylated-CpG island recovery assay (MIRA). Methods, 52:213--7, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Serre, B. H. Lee, and A. H. Ting. MBD-isolated genome sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res, 38:391--9, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. T. S. Keshava Prasad, Renu Goel, Kumaran Kandasamy, et al. Human protein reference database - 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 37:D767--772, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S. Voß. Steiner's problem in graphs: heuristic methods. Discrete Appl Math, 40:45--72, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. V. J Rayward-Smith. The computation of nearly minimal Steiner trees in graphs. Internat J. Math. Ed. Sci. Tech, 14:15--23, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J.-Y. Pan. Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM '06, pages 613--622, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, et al. The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1):10--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J.R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33:159--74, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. H.B. Nair, R. P. Perla, N. B. Kirma, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta mediates the protective effects of aromatase induction in the MMTV-Her-2/neu x aromatase double transgenic mice. Hormones and Cancer, 3:26--36, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. G.E. Konecny, L. Santos, B. Winterhoff, et al. HER2 gene amplification and EGFR expression in a large cohort of surgically staged patients with nonendometrioid (type II) endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer, 100:89--95, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. B. Sitohy, J. A. Nagy, and H. F. Dvorak. Anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy for cancer: Reassessing the target. Cancer Research, 72:1909--1914, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. S.A. Ali, S. K. Zaidi, J. R. Dobson, et al. Transcriptional corepressor TLE1 functions with Runx2 in epigenetic repression of ribosomal RNA genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:4165--9, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. F.R. Althaus. Poly(ADP-ribose): a co-regulator of DNA methylation? Oncogene, 24:11--12, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. P. Caiafa, T. Guastafierro, and M. Zampieri. Epigenetics: poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of PARP-1 regulates genomic methylation patterns. FASEB J, 23:672--8, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M.J. Jahid and J. Ruan. Identification of biomarkers in breast cancer metastasis by integrating protein-protein interaction network and gene expression data. BMC Genomics, S5:S8, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Network-based classification of recurrent endometrial cancers using high-throughput DNA methylation data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BCB '12: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
      October 2012
      725 pages
      ISBN:9781450316705
      DOI:10.1145/2382936

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      BCB '12 Paper Acceptance Rate33of159submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader