skip to main content
10.1145/2379057.2379095acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing and evaluating the mobile experience through iterative field studies

Published:03 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This experience report describes using iterative field studies to design and evaluate the mobile experience of soundtransit.org. One study aimed to evaluate the design of paper prototypes early in the design process and another study was conducted to test the implementation of an interactive prototype. In this report, we share our experience to provide readers with lessons that can be applied to conducting their own mobile field studies. Finally, we describe some of the broader impacts that have resulted from this work.

References

  1. Axure: Interactive Wireframe and Software Mockup Tool: http://www.axure.com. Accessed: 2012-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boren, T. and Ramey, J. 2000. Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. Professional Communication, IEEE &. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Field Study: http://www.usabilitybok.org/field-study. Accessed: 2011-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. MOD 1000: Measuring Usability: http://www.measuringusability.com/products/mod1000. Accessed: 2012-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Making an aluminum mobile device camera sled: 2011. http://gwdesign.tumblr.com/post/5019128889/making-an-aluminum-mobile-device-camera-sled. Accessed: 2012-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mobile Usability Testing Rig for m.cdlib: 2011. http://www.cdlib.org/cdlinfo/2011/02/15/mobile-usability-testing-rig-for-m-cdlib/ . Accessed: 2012-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosenbaum, S. and Kantner, L. 2007. Field usability testing: method, not compromise. International Professional Communication Conference 2007 (Seattle, WA, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Schusteritsch, R., Wei, C.Y. and LaRosa, M. 2007. Towards the perfect infrastructure for usability testing on mobile devices. CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07 (New York, New York, USA, Apr. 2007), 1839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Smith, A. 2012. 17% of cell phone owners do most of their online browsing on their phone, rather than a computer or other device.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sound Transit: http://www.soundtransit.org. Accessed: 2012-07--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing and evaluating the mobile experience through iterative field studies

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGDOC '12: Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication
            October 2012
            386 pages
            ISBN:9781450314978
            DOI:10.1145/2379057

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 October 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader