skip to main content
10.1145/2379057.2379068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Knowledge workers and their use of publicly available online services for day-to-day work

Published:03 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers and organizations have been endeavoring to determine if and how social media can be leveraged to support the day-to-day work of knowledge workers. This study discusses a survey of the use of publicly available online services by knowledge workers that highlights new ways of examining the social media in relation to day-to-day work. Specifically, we examine the use of social media by workers in a variety of contexts as well as analyzing social media at the component level, the level of services, instead of simply at the site level.

References

  1. Archambault, A., and Grudin, J. "A longitudinal study of Facebook, Linkedin, & Twitter use." CHI, 2012, 2741--2750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. boyd, d. m., and Ellison, N.B. "Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13.1, 2007, 210--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradner, E., Kellogg, W.A., Erickson, T. "The Adoption and Use of 'Babble': A Field Study of Chat in the Workplace." ECSCW, 2002, 139--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brzozowski, M. J., Sandholm, T., and Hogg, T. "Effects of Feedback and Peer Pressure on Contributions to Enterprise Social Media Categories and Subject Descriptors." GROUP. 2009. 61--70. Print. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Divine, D., Ferro, T., and Zachry, M. "Work through the Web: A Typology of Web 2.0 Services." SIGDOC. 2011. 121--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DiMicco, J. M. and Millen, D.R. "Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook." Group, 2007, 383--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. DiMicco, J. M., et al. "Motivations for social networking at work." CSCW. 2008. 711--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Efimova, L. and Grudin, J. "Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging." HICSS . 2007. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ferro, T., and M. Zachry. "Networked knowledge workers on the web: An examination of trends 2008 - 2010." Handbook of Research on Business Social Networking: Organizational, Managerial, and Technological Dimensions. Ed. M. M. Cruz-cunha. Business Science Reference, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Grudin, J. and Poole, E. S. "Wikis at work: success factors and challenges for sustainability of enterprise Wikis." Proc. WikiSym, 2010, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Half, R. "Whistle-but don't tweet-while you work." Robert Half Technology. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtzblatt, L. J., Damianos, L.E., and Weiss, D. "Factors impeding Wiki use in the enterprise: a case study." Extended Abstracts CHI, 2010, 4661--4676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., and Panovich, K. "What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior." CHI, 2010, 1739--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Richter, A., and Riemer, K. "Corporate Social Networking Sites -- Modes of Use and Appropriation through Co-Evolution." ACIS. 2009. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sellen, A. J., Murphy, R., and Shaw, K.L. "How knowledge workers use the web." CHI, 2002, 227--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Skeels, M. M. and Grudin, J. "When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and Linkedin." Proc. Group 2009, ACM Press (2009), 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Spinuzzi, C. "Guest Editor's Introduction: Technical Communication in the Age of Distributed Work." Technical Communication Quarterly, 16.3 (2007): 265--277. Print.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yardi, Sarita et al. "Blogging at Work and the Corporate Attention Economy." CHI. 2009. 2071--2080. Print. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J., Yuling, W. "A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: use, value, and related issues." CHI, 2010, 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zhao, D. and Rosson, M.B. "How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work." GROUP, 2004, 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge workers and their use of publicly available online services for day-to-day work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '12: Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication
      October 2012
      386 pages
      ISBN:9781450314978
      DOI:10.1145/2379057

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader