skip to main content
research-article

Do Vendors’ Pricing Decisions Fully Reflect Information in Online Reviews?

Published:01 October 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

By using online retail data collected from Amazon, Barnes & Nobel, and Pricegrabber, this paper investigates whether online vendors’ pricing decisions fully reflect the information contained in various components of customers’ online reviews. The findings suggest that there is inefficiency in vendors’ pricing decisions. Specifically, vendors do not appear to fully understand the incremental predictive power of online reviews in forecasting future sales when they adjust their prices. However, they do understand demand persistence. Interestingly, vendors reduce price if the actual demand is higher than the expected demand (positive demand shock). This phenomenon is attributed to the advertising effect suggested in previous literature and the intense competitiveness of e-Commerce. Finally, we document that vendors do not change their prices directly in response to online reviews; their response to online reviews is through forecasting consumer’s future demand.

References

  1. Abel, A. B. and Mishkin, F. S. 1983. An integrated view of tests of rationality, market efficiency and the short-run neutrality of monetary policy. J. Monetary Econ. 11, 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Archak, N., Ghose, A., and Ipeirotis, P. 2011. Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Manage. Sci. 57, 8, 1485--1509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bakos, Y. 2001. The emerging landscape for retail e-commerce. J. Econ. Persp. 15, 1, 69--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Baltagi, B. H. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergen, M. E., Kauffman, R. J., and Lee, D. 2005. Beyond the hype of frictionless markets: Evidence of heterogeneity in price rigidity on the Internet. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 22, 2, 57--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bickart, B. and Schindler, R. M. 2001. Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. J. Interactive Market 15, 3, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bils, M. 1989. Pricing in a customer market. Quart. J. Econ. 104, 4, 699--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Borenstein, S. and Shepard, A. 1996. Dynamic pricing in retail gasoline markets. RAND J. Econ. 27, 3, 429--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Brynjolfsson, E. and Smith, M. 2000. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Manage. Sci. 46, 4, 563--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., and Smith, M. 2003. Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety. Manage. Sci. 49, 11, 1580--1596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chen, P. Y., Wu, S. Y., and Yoon, J. 2004. The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. 711--724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevalier, J. and Goolsbee, A. 2003. Measuring prices and price competition online: Amazon and Barnes and Noble. Quant. Market. Econ. 1, 2, 203--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chevalier, J. and Mayzlin, D. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Market. Res. 43, 3, 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Chevalier, J., Kashyap, A. K., and Rossi, P. E. 2003. Why don’t prices rise during periods of peak demand? Evidence from scanner data. Amer. Econ. Rev. 93, 1, 15--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Clemons, E. K., Gao, G. D., and Hitt, L. M. 2006. When online reviews meet hyper differentiation: A study of craft beer industry. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 23, 2, 149--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dellarocas, C. 2006. Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Manage. Sci. 52, 10, 1577--1593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dellarocas, C., Awad, N. F., and Zhang, X. 2004. Exploring the value of online reviews to organizations: Implications for revenue forecasting and planning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Duan, W., Gu, B., and Whinston, A. 2008. The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales---An empirical investigation of the movie industry. J. Retail. 84, 2, 233--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ellison, G. 1994. Theories of cartel stability and the joint executive committee. RAND J. Econ. 25, 1, 37--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fama, E. and French, K. 1992. The cross section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47, 2, 427--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Forman, C. A., Ghose, A., and Wiesenfeld, B. 2008. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Syst. Res. 19, 3, 291--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ghose, A. and Ipeirotis, P. G. 2010. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Data Eng. 23, 10, 1498--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ghose, A. and Sundarajan, A. 2006. Evaluating pricing strategy using e-commerce data: Evidence and estimation challenges. Stat. Sci. 21, 2, 131--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ghose, A., Smith, M. D., and Telang, R. 2006. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Inform. Syst. Res. 17, 1, 3--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Godes, D. and Mayzlin, D. 2004. Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Market. Sci. 23, 4, 545--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Haltiwanger, J. and Harrington, J. E. 1991. The impact of cyclical demand movements on collusive behavior. RAND J. Econ. 22, 1, 89--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hosken, D., Matsa, D., and Reiffen, D. 2000. How Do Retailers Adjust Price? Evidence from Store-Level Price Elasticity. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics: Working Papers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, N., Liu, L., and Zhang, J. 2008. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inform. Technol. Manage. 9, 3, 201--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lal, R. and Villas-Boas, J. M. 1998. Price promotions and trade deals with multiproduct retailers. Manage. Sci. 44, 7, 935--949. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lau, R. Y. K., Liao, S. Y., Kwon, R. C., Xu, K., Xia, Y., and Li, Y. 2011. Text mining and probabilistic language modeling for online review spam detection. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Li, X. and Hitt, L. M. 2008. Self selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Syst. Res. 19, 4, 456--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Li, X., Hitt, L. M., and Zhang, J. 2011. Product reviews and competition in markets for repeat purchase products. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 27, 4, 9--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Liu, Y. 2006. Word-of-mouth for movies: Its Dynamics and impact box office revenue. J. Market. 70, 3, 74--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Mayzlin, D. 2006. Promotional chat on the Internet. Manage. Sci. 25, 2, 155--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Mishkin, F. 1983. A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing Policy Effectiveness and Efficient-Market Models. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholson, W. 1998. Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions 7th Ed. The Dryden Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sloan, R. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Account. Rev. 71, 3, 289--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., and Nijs, V. 2008. Demand-based pricing versus past-price dependence: A cost--benefit analysis. J. Market. 72, 15--27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Steiner, R. L. 1973. Does advertising lower consumer prices? J. Market. 37, 4, 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Thomas, W. 1999. A test of the market’s mispricing of domestic and foreign earnings. J. Account. Econ. 28, 243--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Warner, E. J. and Barsky, R. B. 1995. The timing and magnitude of retail store markdowns: Evidence from weekends and holiday. Quart. J. Econ. 110, 2, 321--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. Account. Rev. 76, 3, 357--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Zhang, Z., Li, X., and Chen, Y. 2012. Deciphering word-of-mouth in social media: Text-based metrics of consumer reviews. ACM Trans. Manage. Inform. Syst. 3, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Do Vendors’ Pricing Decisions Fully Reflect Information in Online Reviews?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 3, Issue 3
      October 2012
      115 pages
      ISSN:2158-656X
      EISSN:2158-6578
      DOI:10.1145/2361256
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2012
      • Accepted: 1 July 2012
      • Revised: 1 March 2012
      • Received: 1 October 2011
      Published in tmis Volume 3, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader