skip to main content
10.1145/2348283.2348375acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

See-to-retrieve: efficient processing of spatio-visual keyword queries

Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The wide proliferation of powerful smart phones equipped with multiple sensors, 3D graphical engine, and 3G connection has nurtured the creation of a new spectrum of visual mobile applications. These applications require novel data retrieval techniques which we call What-You-Retrieve-Is-What-You-See (WYRIWYS). However, state-of-the-art spatial retrieval methods are mostly distance-based and thus inapplicable for supporting WYRIWYS. Motivated by this problem, we propose a novel query called spatio-visual keyword (SVK) query, to support retrieving spatial Web objects that are both visually conspicuous and semantically relevant to the user. To capture the visual features of spatial Web objects with extents, we introduce a novel visibility metric which computes object visibility in a cumulative manner. We propose an incremental method called Complete Occlusion-map based Retrieval (COR) to answer SVK queries. This method exploits effective heuristics to prune the search space and construct a data structure called Occlusion-Map. Then the method adopts the best-first strategy to return relevant objects incrementally. Extensive experiments on real and synthetic data sets suggest that our method is effective and efficient when processing SVK queries.

References

  1. X. Cao, G. Cong, and C. S. Jensen. Retrieving top-k prestige-based relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 3(1):373--384, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. X. Cao, G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and B. C. Ooi. Collective spatial keyword querying. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 373--384, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y.-Y. Chen, T. Suel, and A. Markowetz. Efficient query processing in geographic web search engines. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 277--288, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Cohen-Or, Y. Chrysanthou, C. T. Silva, and F. Durand. A survey of visibility for walkthrough applications. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 9(3):412--431, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Cong, C. S. Jensen, and D. Wu. Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB, 2(1):337--348, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. de Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. Overmars, and O. Cheong. Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, second edition, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Fagin, A. Lotem, and M. Naor. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. In PODS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. D. Felipe, V. Hristidis, and N. Rishe. Keyword search on spatial databases. In ICDE, pages 656--665, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Gao, B. Zheng, G. Chen, W.-C. Lee, K. C. K. Lee, and Q. Li. Visible reverse k-nearest neighbor queries. In ICDE, pages 1203--1206, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Gao, B. Zheng, W.-C. Lee, and G. Chen. Continuous visible nearest neighbor queries. In EDBT, pages 144--155, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Guttman. R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In SIGMOD, pages 47--57, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Hariharan, B. Hore, C. Li, and S. Mehrotra. Processing spatial-keyword (sk) queries in geographic information retrieval (gir) systems. In SSDBM, page 16, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Kofler, M. Gervautz, and M. Gruber. R-trees for organizing and visualizing 3d gis databases. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 11(3):129--143, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. C. K. Lee, W.-C. Lee, and H. V. Leong. Nearest surrounder queries. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 22(10):1444--1458, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Nutanong, E. Tanin, and R. Zhang. Incremental evaluation of visible nearest neighbor queries. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 22(5):665--681, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Shou, K. Chen, G. Chen, C. Zhang, Y. Ma, and X. Zhang. What-you-retrieve-is-what-you-see: a preliminary cyber-physical search engine. In SIGIR, pages 1273--1274, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Shou, Z. Huang, and K.-L. Tan. Hdov-tree: The structure, the storage, the speed. In ICDE, pages 557--568, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. B. Yao, F. Li, M. Hadjieleftheriou, and K. Hou. Approximate string search in spatial databases. In ICDE, pages 545--556, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Zhang, Y. M. Chee, A. Mondal, A. K. H. Tung, and M. Kitsuregawa. Keyword search in spatial databases: Towards searching by document. In ICDE, pages 688--699, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. See-to-retrieve: efficient processing of spatio-visual keyword queries

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '12: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      August 2012
      1236 pages
      ISBN:9781450314725
      DOI:10.1145/2348283

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader