skip to main content
10.1145/2348283.2348361acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Finding topic experts on microblogging sites with millions of users, such as Twitter, is a hard and challenging problem. In this paper, we propose and investigate a new methodology for discovering topic experts in the popular Twitter social network. Our methodology relies on the wisdom of the Twitter crowds -- it leverages Twitter Lists, which are often carefully curated by individual users to include experts on topics that interest them and whose meta-data (List names and descriptions) provides valuable semantic cues to the experts' domain of expertise. We mined List information to build Cognos, a system for finding topic experts in Twitter. Detailed experimental evaluation based on a real-world deployment shows that: (a) Cognos infers a user's expertise more accurately and comprehensively than state-of-the-art systems that rely on the user's bio or tweet content, (b) Cognos scales well due to built-in mechanisms to efficiently update its experts' database with new users, and (c) Despite relying only on a single feature, namely crowdsourced Lists, Cognos yields results comparable to, if not better than, those given by the official Twitter experts search engine for a wide range of queries in user tests. Our study highlights Lists as a potentially valuable source of information for future content or expert search systems in Twitter.

References

  1. There Are Now 155m Tweets Posted Per Day, Triple the Number a Year Ago. http://rww.to/gv4VqA, April 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Twitter to hit 500 million accounts by February. http://bit.ly/twitpopulation, Jan 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Clarke, G. Cormack, and E. Tudhope. Relevance ranking for one to three term queries. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Kallen. Twitter blog: Soon to Launch: Lists. http://blog.twitter.com/2009/09/soon-to-launch-lists.html, Sep 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Lee, H. Kwak, H. Park, and S. Moon. Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in Twitter. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Metzler, S. Dumais, and C. Meek. Similarity measures for short segments of text. In Proceedings of European Conference on Information Retrieval, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Pal and S. Counts. Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Pochampally and V. Varma. User context as a source of topic retrieval in Twitter. In Proceedings of Workshop on Enriching Information Retrieval (with ACM SIGIR), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. M. Romero, W. Galuba, S. Asur, and B. A. Huberman. Influence and passivity in social media. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Sharma, S. Ghosh, F. Benevenuto, N. Ganguly, and K. Gummadi. Inferring Who-is-Who in the Twitter Social Network. In Proceedings of Workshop on Online Social Networks (with ACM SIGCOMM), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Teevan, D. Ramage, and M. R. Morris.#twittersearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rate Limiting | Twitter Developers. https://dev.twitter.com/docs/rate-limiting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Twitter: Who to Follow. http://twitter.com/#!/who_to_follow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Twitter Improves "Who To Follow" Results & Gains Advanced Search Page. http://selnd.com/wtfdesc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. J. Welch, U. Schonfeld, D. He, and J. Cho. Topical semantics of Twitter links. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on Twitter. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Zhang, M. S. Ackerman, and L. Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: Structure and algorithms. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGIR '12: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
            August 2012
            1236 pages
            ISBN:9781450314725
            DOI:10.1145/2348283

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 August 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader