Applying the PLEX framework in designing for playfulness

ABSTRACT

In addition to functionality and usability, interactive products are increasingly expected to provide pleasurable experiences to their users. Playfulness is a part of these experiences. However, playfulness can manifest in many different ways as humans are inherently playful by nature. This poses challenges for designing for playfulness. To tackle this broad field, we have developed the Playful Experiences (PLEX) framework. The two-fold purpose of the PLEX framework is to be a conceptual tool for understanding the playful aspects of user experience (UX), and be a practical tool for designing for such experiences through established user-centered design (UCD) methods. In this paper we present an overview of our work during 2008--2010 on designing for playful experiences. After introducing and summarizing previous studies, we motivate the reasons for designing for playfulness by framing PLEX within the domains of user experience and emotional experience. Then, we briefly discuss the creation and evaluation of the PLEX Cards and its associated techniques as practical design tools based on the PLEX framework, followed by a concrete design case where these tools have been used. We also present the development of the PLEX Design Patterns for actual design solutions for playfulness. Based on this work, we propose the PLEX framework as a powerful tool for understanding playful experiences, and for providing inspiration to design interactive products that elicit playfulness.

References

1. Yahoo Design Patten Library, {Accessed January 27, 2011} http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/
2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, 1977.
3. Apter, M. J. Reversal Theory: The Dynamics of Motivation, Emotion and Persona. 2^nd edition, Oneworld publications, 2006.
4. Arrasvuori, J., Boberg, M., Korhonen, H. Understanding Playfulness: An Overview of the Revised Playful Experience (PLEX) Framework. In proc D&E, Illinois Institute of Technology (2010).
5. Arrasvuori, J., Korhonen, H., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. Exploring Playfulness in User Experience of Personal Mobile Products. In proc OZCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 88--95.
6. Battarbee, K., Koskinen, I. Co-experience: user experience as interaction. CoDesign 1, 1 (2005), 5--18.
7. Björk, S., Holopainen, J. Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media, 2004.
8. Borchers, J. A Pattern Approach to Interaction Design. 1st Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
9. Brown, S., Vaughan, C. Play: How it Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination, and Invigorates the Soul. Penquin Books, 2009.
10. Buxton, B. Sketching User Experiences. Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.
11. Costello, B., Edmonds, E. A Study in Play, Pleasure and Interaction Design. In proc DPPI, ACM (2007), 76--91.
12. Crumlish, C., Malone, E. Designing Social Interfaces: Principles, Patterns, and Practices for Improving the User Experience. 1st edition, Yahoo Press, 2009.
13. Desmet, P. Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products. In Funology: from Usability to Enjoyment, Blythe, M., Monk, A., Overbeeke, C. J., Wright, P. (Eds) Kluwer academic Publishers (2003), 111--123.
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J. Design Patterns -- Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
15. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J. E. Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming 33, 4 (2002), 441--467.
16. Halskov, K., Dalsgaard, P. Inspiration card workshops. In proc DIS, ACM Press (2006), 2--11.
17. Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., De Angeli, A. Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. TOCHI 15, 4 (2008), 1--30.
18. Hartson, H. R. Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. BIT 22, 5 (2003), 315--338.
19. Hassenzahl, M. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship between User and Product. In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Blythe, M., Monk, A. F., Overbeeke, K., Wright, P. (Eds) Kluwer Academic Publisher (2003), 31--42.
20. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A. Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. IwC 22, 5 (2010), 353--362.
21. Hekkert, P., Mostert, M., Stompff, G. Dancing with a machine: a case of experience-driven design. In proc DPPI, ACM (2003), 114--119.
22. Jordan, P. W. Designing Pleasurable Products. CRC Press, 2000.
23. Korhonen, H., Montola, M., Arrasvuori, J. Understanding Playful User Experience through Digital Games. In proc DPPI, Université de Technologie de Compiègne (2009), 274--285.
24. Kubovy, M. On Pleasures of the Mind. In Well-being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwartz, N. (Eds) Russell Sage Foundation (1999).
25. Kultima, A., Niemelä, J., Paavilainen, J., Saarenpää, H. Designing game idea generation games. In proc Future Play '08, ACM Press (2008), 137--144.
26. Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Kort, J. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In proc CHI, ACM (2009), 719--728.
27. Lazzaro, N. Why We Play: Affect and the Fun of Games: Designing Emotions for Games. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Techniques and Emerging Applications, Sears, A., Jacko, J. A. (Eds) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2008), 679--700.
28. Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J. PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. In proc Fun and Games, ACM (2010), 28--37.
29. Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J. The PLEX Cards and its Techniques as Sources of Inspiration When Designing for Playfulness. To appear in IJART (2011).
30. Malone, T. W. Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In proc CHI, ACM (1982), 63--68.
31. Norman, D. A. Emotional Design: Why Do We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, 2005.
32. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2007.
33. Rheinfrank, J., Evenson, S. Design languages. In Bringing design to software, Winogard, T. (Eds) ACM Press (1996), 63--85.
34. Sleeswijk, V. F., Stappers, P. J., van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1, 2 (2005), 119--149.
35. Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. CIE 3, 3 (2005).
36. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. IwC 13, 2 (2000), 127--145.
37. Woszczynski, A. B., Roth, P. L., Segars, A. H. Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions. CHB 18, 4 (2002), 369--388.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Interaction design

    • Interaction design process and methods

      • User centered design