skip to main content
10.5555/2328888.2328892acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnparConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sketches by Paul the robot

Published:04 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe Paul, a robotic installation that produces observational sketches of people. The sketches produced have been considered of interest by fine art professionals in recent art fairs and exhibitions, as well as by the public at large. We identify factors that may account for the perceived qualities of the produced sketches. A technical overview of the system is also presented.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p17-tresset.mp4

mp4

10 MB

References

  1. {Bra00} Bradski G.: Programmer's tool chest: The OpenCV library. Dr. Dobbs Journal (2000). 7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {Bre82} Brennan S.: Caricature Generator. Master's thesis, MIT, Sept. 1982. 3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {Bre02} Breazeal C.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. 2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {C*04} Chen H., et al.: Example-based composite sketching of human portraits. In Proc. of NPAR (2004), ACM Press, pp. 95--102. 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {CB97} Cohen D., Bennett S.: Why can't most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, 3 (1997), 609--621. 4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. {CCCN*09} Coen-Cagli R., Coragio P., Napoletano P., et al.: Visuomotor characterization of eye movements in a drawing task. Vision Research 49, 8 (2009), 810--818. 4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. {CH02} Collomosse J. P., Hall P.: Painterly rendering using image salience. In Proceedings 20th Eurographics (2002), pp. 122--128. 4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {Coh88} Cohen H.: How to draw three people in a botanical garden. In AAAI (1988), pp. 846--856. 3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {CS87} Crowley J. L., Sanderson A. C.: Multiple resolution representation and probabilistic matching of 2-d gray-scale shape. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9, 1 (Jan. 1987), 113--121. 7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {FLL92} Fol Leymarie F., Levine M. D.: Simulating the grassfire transform using an active contour model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 1 (Jan. 1992), 56--75. 6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {GB10} Ghedini F., Bergamasco M.: Robotic creatures: Anthropomorphism and interaction in contemporary art. In IEEE Ro-Man 2010 International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2010), IEEE, pp. 731--736. 2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. {GG01} Gooch B., Gooch A.: Non-photorealistic Rendering. A. K. Peters, 2001. 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. {Gra08} Granjon P.: Performing with machines and machines that perform. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 4 (2008), 45--57. 2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. {GS11} Gemeinboeck P., Saunders R.: Zwischenraume: The machine as voyeur. In Proceedings of the first International Conference on Transdisciplinary Imagingat the Intersections between Art, Science and Culture (2011), pp. 62--70. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. {HW59} Hubel D., Wiesel T.: Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. In Journal of Physiology, vol. 148. Physiological society, London, 1959, pp. 574--591. 4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. {IKN98} Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E.: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 11 (Nov 1998), 1254--1259. 4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. {JP87} Jones J. P., Palmer L. A.: An evaluation of the two-dimensional gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58, 6 (December 1987), 1233--1258. 4, 7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. {Kac97} Kac E.: Origin and development of robotic art. Art Journal 56, 3 (1997), 60--67. 2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. {LM02} Lienhart R., Maydt J.: An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Image Processing (2002), pp. 900--903. 7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. {Mac05} MacDorman K. F.: Androids as an experimental apparatus: Why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In Proceedings of the CogSci 2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science (2005), pp. 106--118. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. {Mas70} Mashiro M.: Bukimi no tani. Energy 7 (1970), 22--35. in Japanese; see MacDorman 2005, Appendix B, for English translation. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. {MFN06} Metta G., Fitzpatrick P., Natale L.: Yarp: Yet another robot platform. International Journal of Advanced Robotics Systems, special issue on Software Development and Integration in Robotics 3, 1 (2006). 6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. {Mou07} Moura L.: A new kind of art: The robotic action painter. In 10th Generative Art Conference (2007), pp. 16--22. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. {PK97} Petkov N., Kruizinga P.: Computational models of visual neurons specialised in the detection of periodic and aperiodic oriented visual stimuli: bar and grating cells. Biological Cybernetics 76, 2 (1997), 83--96. 4, 7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. {QCG*09} Quigley M., Conley K., Gerkey P., et al.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software (2009). 6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. {Raw87} Rawson P.: Drawing. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1987. 7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. {Rei87} Reichardt J.: Machines and art. Leonardo 20, 4 (1987), pp. 367--372. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. {TFL06} Tresset P., Fol Leymarie F.: AIKON: The Artistic/Automatic IKONograph. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference SIGGRAPH'06 (Boston, USA, July-August 2006). Research poster. 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. {TP11} Thai C., Paulishen M.: Using robotis bioloid systems for educational robotics. In Proceedings of the IEEE SouthEastern Conference (Nashville, TN, USA, 2011). 5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. {VJ01} Viola P., Jones M.: Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2001), pp. 511--518. 7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. {VS84} Van Sommers P.: Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK, 1984. 4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. {Zek98} Zeki S.: Art and the brain. In Deadalus, vol. 127. MIT press, 1998, pp. 71--103. 3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. {Ziv05} Zivanovic A.: The development of a cybernetic sculptor: Edward ihnatowicz and the senster. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Creativity and Cognition (New York, NY, USA, 2005), ACM press, pp. 102--109. 2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sketches by Paul the robot

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CAe '12: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging
        June 2012
        128 pages
        ISBN:9781450315845

        Publisher

        Eurographics Association

        Goslar, Germany

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 June 2012

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CAe '12 Paper Acceptance Rate11of25submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate11of25submissions,44%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader