skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

UX_Mate: from facial expressions to UX evaluation

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose and evaluate UX_Mate, a non-invasive system for the automatic assessment of User eXperience (UX). In addition, we contribute a novel database of annotated and synchronized videos of interactive behavior and facial expressions. UX_Mate is a modular system which tracks facial expressions of users, interprets them based on pre-set rules, and generates predictions about the occurrence of a target emotional state, which can be linked to interaction events. The system simplifies UX evaluation providing an indication of event occurrence. UX_Mate has several advantages compared to other state of the art systems: easy deployment in the user's natural environment, avoidance of invasive devices, and extreme cost reduction. The paper reports a pilot and a validation study on a total of 46 users, where UX_Mate was used for identifying interaction difficulties. The studies show encouraging results that open possibilities for automatic real-time UX evaluation in ecological environments.

References

  1. Ariely, D. and Cannon, Z. Gestalt characteristics of experiences: the defining feature of summarized events. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making (2000), 13 (2), 191--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Benedek, J., and Miner, T. Measuring desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting. UPA (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, M., and Lang, P. J. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment semantic differential manikin and the semantic differential. Science 25, I (1994), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Branco, P., Firth, P., Encarnação, L. M., and Bonato, P. Faces of emotion in human-computer interaction. In CHI EA (2005), 1236--1239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burr, B. Vaca: a tool for qualitative video analysis. In CHI EA '06 (2006), 622--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chorianopoulos, K., and Spinellis, D. User interface evaluation of interactive tv: a media studies perspective. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 5 (2006), 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cohen, I., Sebe, N., Chen, L., Garg, A., and Huang, T. S. Facial expression recognition from video sequences: Temporal and static modelling. In Comput. Vis. Imag. Und. (2003), 160--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dacher, K. Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 3 (1995), 441--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., and Friesen, W. V. Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 2 (1990), 330--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Den Uyl, M., Van Kuilenburg, H., and Lebert, E. Facereader: an online facial expression recognition system. In Measuring Behavior (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Derbaix, C. M. The impact of affective reactions on attitudes toward the advertisement and the brand: A step toward ecological validity. J. Marketing Res. 32, 4 (1995), 470--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Desmet, P. Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004), 111--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ekman, P. Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. W. W. Norton & Company, (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, (1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Grootjen, M., Neerincx, M. A., van Weert, J. C. M., and Truong, K. P. Measuring cognitive task load on a naval ship: implications of a real world environment. In Proc. FAC (2007), 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I. H. The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, (2009), 10--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hassenzahl, M., and Tractinsky, N. User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hazlett, R. L., and Benedek, J. Measuring emotional valence to understand the user's experience of software. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65 (2007), 306--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Isbister, K., Hk, K., Laaksolahti, J., and Sharp, M. The sensual evaluation instrument: Developing a trans-cultural self-report measure of affect. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 4 (2007), 315--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A. and Redelmeier, D. A. When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4 (1993), 401--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kuilenburg, H. V., Wiering, M., and Uyl, M. D. A model based method for automatic facial expression recognition. In Proc. ECML (2005), 194--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N.: Assessing Dimensions of Perceived Visual Aesthetics of Web Sites. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60, 3 (2004), 269--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lopatovska, I., and Arapakis, I. Theories, methods and current research on emotions in library and information science, information retrieval and human-computer interaction. Inf. Process. Manage. 47 (2011), 575--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mahlke, S., Minge, M., and Thüring, M. Measuring multiple components of emotions in interactive contexts. In CHI EA '06 (2006), 1061--1066. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mcdaniel, B., D'Mello, S., King, B., Chipman, P., Tapp, K., and Graesser, A. Facial Features for Affective State Detection in Learning Environments. In Proc. 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehrabian, A. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Curr. Psychol. 14, 4 (1996), 261--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Pantic, M., and Rothkrantz, L. Automatic Analysis of Facial Expressions: The State of the Art. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 22, 12 (2000), 1424--1445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Picard, R. W. Affective Computing for HCI. In Proc. HCI 1999, 1, 1 (1999), 829--833. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Saari, T., Puttonen, S., and Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. The psychophysiology of James Bond: Phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion 8, 1 (2008), 114--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ryan, A., Cohn, J., Lucey, S., Saragih, J., Lucey, P., De la Torre, F., and Rossi, A. Automated facial expression recognition system. In Proc. IEEE ICCST (2009), 172--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Scheirer, J., Fernandez, R., Klein, J., and Picard, R. W. Frustrating the user on purpose: A step toward building an affective computer. Interact. Comput. (2001) 93--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sebe, N., Lew, M. S., Cohen, I., Sun, Y., Gevers, T., and Huang, T. S. Authentic facial expression analysis. In Proc. IEEE AFGR (2004), 517--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Swindells, C., Maclean, K. E., Booth, K. S., and Meitner, M. A case-study of affect measurement tools for physical user interface design. In Proc. GI (2006), 243--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tractinsky, N. and Zmiri, D.: Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. Aesthetic computing (2006), 405--422Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tullis, T. S. Screen design. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Westerman, S. J., Sutherland, E. J., Robinson, L., Powell, H., and Tuck, G. A multi-method approach to the assessment of web page designs. In Proc. ACII (2007), 302--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Zaman, B., and Shrimpton-Smith, T. The facereader: measuring instant fun of use. In Proc., NordiCHI '06 (2006), 457--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Joho, H., Staiano, J., Sebe, N., and Jose, J. Looking at the Viewer: Exploiting Facial Activities to Detect Personal Highlights of Multimedia Contents. Int. J. Multimed. Tools App. 51, 2 (2011), 505--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. UX_Mate: from facial expressions to UX evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader