skip to main content
10.1145/2311917.2311919acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting the developer in an accessible edition of web communications: a study of five desktop tools

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing guidelines on Web applications development with accessibility are currently not applied by many developers. In this study, the existence and operation of accessibility features in Web authoring tools were verified. In order to do this, five authoring tools were selected to perform an analysis by inspection for several accessibility features. In the same way, a set of criteria involving the search and testing of 14 features which support developers was defined. Inspected features are directly related to the W3C documents ATAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0. As a result, important considerations about the inspection were made and it was determined that the tools already provide some support for accessibility although they are still far from ideal scenario.

References

  1. Bigham J. P., Brudvik J. T. and Zhang B. 2010. Accessibility by demonstration: enabling end users to guide developers to web accessibility solutions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dreamweaver (2011). available at http://www.adobe.com/dreamweaver, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eclipse (2012), available at http://www.eclipse.org, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Freire, A. P.; Russo, C. M. and Fortes, R. P. M. A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 2008. v. 1. p. 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lima, S. T. Avaliação de acessibilidade de sítios Web por meio de métricas de software, Dissertation -- Pontifical Catholic University of Brasília, Brasília -- DF, 2007, 138 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. López J. M., Pascual, A., Masip, L., Granollers, T., Cardet, X., Influence of web content management systems in web content accessibility. In Proceedings of INTERACT'11, September 5 to 9, 2011 at Lisboa, Portugal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Maia, L., Um processo para o desenvolvimento de aplicações Web acessíveis, Dissertation -- Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, 2010, 106 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maia, L., Turine, M., Sandim, H., Paiva, D. Um modelo para o Desenvolvimento de Aplicações Web Acessíveis. In Proceedings of WebMedia 2010, October, 5 to 8 of 2010, at Belo Horizonte -- MG, Brazil, pages 235--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, A.; Cechich, A. and Rossi, G. Accessibility at early stages: insights from the designer perspective. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2011). Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, March 28--29, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Microsoft Expression Web (2008), available at http://www.microsoft.com/expression/web.aspx, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Netbeans (2012), Netbeans platform, available at http://www.netbeans.org/, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. NVU (2005), available at http://www.nvu.com, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Power, C. and Petrie, H. Accessibility in non-professional web authoring tools: a missed web 2.0 opportunity? In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press. 2007. p. 116--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Schulz, M.; Pieper, M. 2006. Web compliance management: barrier-free websites just by simply pressing the button? accessibility and the use of content-management-systems. In Proceedings of the 9th conference on User interfaces for all (ERCIM'06). Constantine Stephanidis and Michael Pieper (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 419--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Thatcher, J.; Cynthia, W.; Henry, S.; Swierenga, S.; Urban, M.; Burks, M.; Bohman, P. Constructing Accessible Web Sites. 1a. ed.: Glasshaus, 2002. 415 p. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Trewin, S.; Cragun, B., Swart, C.; Jonathan, B and Richards, J. 2010. Accessibility challenges and tool features: an IBM Web developer perspective. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W3C (2002). Techniques for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, avaiable at http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10-TECHS/, access at January 3, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W3C (2008). Techniques for WCAG 2.0, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/, access at January 3, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. W3C (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/, access at January 5, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supporting the developer in an accessible edition of web communications: a study of five desktop tools

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ISDOC '12: Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Systems and Design of Communication
          June 2012
          62 pages
          ISBN:9781450312943
          DOI:10.1145/2311917

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 June 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate31of63submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader