skip to main content
10.1145/2245276.2245470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RevGlyph: a technique for reverting anaglyph stereoscopic videos

Published:26 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to visualize stereoscopic videos, it is necessary a pair of videos of a same scene horizontally displaced -- the stereo pair --, thus requiring twice the space to be stored. The anaglyph conversion is a technique in which color components of the stereo pair are removed, being the remaining color components joined to form a single video. With that, it is possible to reduce at least by the half the amount of data to be stored. Unfortunately, the anaglyphic video is not supported by other stereoscopic visualization methods -- they require the stereo pair. Our proposal is to create an anaglyph reversion technique that would enable to recreate the stereo pair from an anaglyph video, which could make stereo information available for other visualization methods. Such reversion is not straightforward, since during the anaglyph conversion some color data is lost. In this paper, we introduce RevGlyph, an approach to the anaglyph reversion by storing the removed color components in a special structure that we call "Color Index Table". We then discuss the results obtained from our experiments with this technique, achieving a good compression rate of 79.64% compared to the original image. The results also showed that the process does not interfere with the stereo depth perception.

References

  1. Adikari, A. B. B.; Fernando, W. A. C.; Arachchi, H. K.; Loo, K. 2005. A H.264 compliant stereoscopic video codec. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005. Canadian Conference on (May 2005), 1614--1617, 1--4. DOI=10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557292Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Balasubramaniyam, B; Edirisinghe, E; Bez, H. An extended H.264 CODEC for stereoscopic video coding, Proc. SPIE (January, 2005), 5664, 116. DOI=10.1117/12.587583Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradski, G., Kaehler, A. 2008. Leaning OpenCV. O'Reilly, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubois, E. 2001. A projection method to generate anaglyph stereo images. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001. Proceedings. (ICASSP '01). 2001 IEEE International Conference on (May, 2001), 1661--1664. DOI= 10.1109/ICASSP.2001.941256 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gonzalez, R. C.; Woods, R. E. 2008. Digital Image Processing. 3rd ed. Pearson Prentice-Hall, United States. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. ITU-R. 2011. Recommendation ITU-R BT. 601-7: Studio encoding parameters of digital television for standard 4: 3. International Telecommunication Union.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ITU-T. 2004. Objective perceptual assessment of video quality: Full reference television. International Telecommunication Union.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. KERR, D. A. 2009. Chrominance Subsampling in Digital Images. Available at <http://dougkerr.net/pumpkin/articles/Subsampling.pdf>. Last access September 7th 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lipton, L. 1982. Foundations of the Stereoscopic Cinema: a study in depth. Van Nostrand Reinhold, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipton, L. 1997. Stereo-Vision Formats for Video and Computer Graphics. Proc. SPIE (February. 1997), 3012, 239. DOI=10.1117/12.274462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mendiburu, B. 2009. 3D Movie Making Stereoscopic Digital Cinema from Script to Screen. Focal Press, Elsevier, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Merkle, P.; Smolic, A.; Muller, K.; Wiegand, T. 2007. Efficient Prediction Structures for Multiview Video Coding. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on (November, 2007), 1461--1473. DOI=10.1109/TCSVT.2007.903665 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Richardson, I. E. 2003. H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression: Video Coding for Next Generation Multimedia. Wiley, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Smolic, A.; Mueller, K.; Merkle, P.; Kauff, P.; Wiegand, T. 2009. An Overview of Available and Emerging 3D Video Formats and Depth Enhanced Stereo as Efficient Generic Solution. Proceedings of the 27th conference on Picture Coding Symposium, 2009 (May, 2009), 1--4, 6--8. DOI=10.1109/PCS.2009.5167358 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. StereoGraphics Corporation. 1997. Stereographics® Developers' Handbook: Background on Creating Images for CrystalEyes and SimulEyes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sumei Li; Chunping Hou; Yicai Ying; Xiaowei Song; Lei Yang. 2009. Stereoscopic Video Compression Based on H.264 MVC. Image and Signal Processing, 2009. CISP '09. 2nd International Congress on (October, 2009), 1--5, 17--19. DOI=10.1109/CISP.2009.5301218Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vetro, A. 2010. Representation and Coding Formats for Stereo and Multiview Video. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 51--73. DOI=10.1007/978-3-642-11686-5_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Winkler, S. 2005. Digital Video Quality: vision model and metrics. Wiley, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Woods, A. J. 2011. How are crosstalk and ghosting defined in the stereoscopic literature?. Proc. SPIE (January, 2011), 7863, 78630Z. DOI=10.1117/12.877045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. RevGlyph: a technique for reverting anaglyph stereoscopic videos

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2012
        2179 pages
        ISBN:9781450308571
        DOI:10.1145/2245276
        • Conference Chairs:
        • Sascha Ossowski,
        • Paola Lecca

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 March 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate270of1,056submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader