Namibian and american cultural orientations toward facebook

ABSTRACT

Nadkarni and Hofman's [8] meta-review of literature on Facebook usage recommends examining differences in Facebook use between collectivistic and individualistic cultures. We discuss early findings of an exploratory study to compare use between participants in America, Namibia, and expatriate Namibians. From this, we identified five key areas of difference: 1) Motivations for joining Facebook; 2) Attitude toward Facebook connections; 3) Self presentation and photo sharing; 4) Communication about death, religion, and politics; 5) General privacy definitions. However, our findings showed no statistical difference in the Collectivism Scale [10] administered among the three groups, despite Namibia being considered a highly collectivistic county [12] and the US being a highly individualistic country [6].

References

1. Bidwell, N., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., KochKapuire, G. and Chivuno-Kuria, S. Situated interactions between audiovisual media and African herbal lore. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15, 6 (2011), 609--627.
2. Bidwell, N. Ubuntu in the network: Humanness in social capital in rural South Africa. Interactions 17, 2 (2010), 68--71.
3. Danah, D. White flight in networked publics? How race and class shaped American teen engagement with MySpace and Facebook {draft}. In Digital Race Anthology, ed. Lisa Nakamura and Peter Chow-White. 2010. Routledge Press {forthcoming}.
4. Facebook Fact Sheet. http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22
5. Getty, E., Cobb, J., Gabeler, M., Nelson, C., Weng, E., and Hancock, J. I said your name in an empty room: Grieving and continuing bonds on Facebook. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 997--1000.
6. Hofstede. G. http://geert-hofstede.com/unitedstates.html
7. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010). 1311--1320.
8. Nadkarni, A. and Hofmann, S. Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences 52 (2012), 243--249.
9. Strater, K. and Lipford, H. Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. In Proc. BCS HCI (1), (2008), 111--119.
10. Wagner, J. Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal 3, 1 (1995), 152--172.
11. Wang, Y., Norcie, G. and Cranor, L. Who is concerned about what? A study of American, Chinese and Indian users' privacy concerns on social network sites. In Proc. Trust 2011. Vol. 6740, (2011), 146--153.
12. Winschiers, H. and Fendler, J., Assumptions considered harmful: The need to redefine usability. In Proc. USI-HCII'07. Nuray Aykin (Ed.), 2007. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 452--461.
13. Zhao, C. and Gonglue, J. Cultural differences on visual self-presentation through social networking site profile images. In Proc. Chi 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1129--1132.
14. Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., and Martin, J. Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behaviour 24, 5 (2008), 1816--1836.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)