skip to main content
10.1145/2214091.2214112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Train and retain: the impact of mentoring on the retention of FLOSS developers

Published:31 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The acquisition of new knowledge is a critical task for software development. IT companies spend considerable resources in the training of their employees to succeed in a continuously changing industry. Depending on the voluntary commitment of their contributors, initiatives developing Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) identified members' learning and their retention as vital. Although contributors' knowledge building has been repeatedly found to facilitate their project continuance, FLOSS projects are lacking operational advices on how to assist their members' learning. Drawing on previous literature which emphasizes project members' social interactions and their practical experiences to build new knowledge, we propose mentoring as a training method for FLOSS projects. Based on organizational experiences, we propose a measure to evaluate mentoring as an appropriate strategy for FLOSS initiatives to facilitate individuals' learning and to retain their contributors on longitudinal base.

References

  1. Adams, P. J., Capiluppi, A., and Boldyreff, C. 2009. Coordination and productivity issues in free software: The role of brooks' law. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE, 319--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., and Lima, L. 2004. Career Benefits Associated With Mentoring for Proteges: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 1, 127--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Anderson, C. and Lee, S. 2007. IDC MarketScape: Worldwide IT Education and Training 2008 Vendor Analysis. http://www.idcresearch.com/research/view_lot.jsp?containerId=209799. Accessed October 31st.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brashear, T. G., Bellenger, D. N., Boles, J. S., and Barksdale ., H. C. 2006. An Exploratory Study of the Relative Effectiveness of Different Types of Sales Force Mentors. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 26, 1, 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Colazo, J. and Fang, Y. 2009. Impact of license choice on Open Source Software development activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60, 5, 997--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David, P. A. and Shapiro, J. S. 2008. Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Information Economics and Policy 20, 4, 364--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Drucker, P. F. 2002. They're not Employees, They're People. Harvard Business Review 80, 2, 70--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eby, L., Butts, M., Lockwood, A., and Simon, S. A. 2004. Protégés Negative Mentoring Experiences: Construct Development and Nomological Validation. Personnel Psychology 57, 2, 411--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 2, 350--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fang, Y. and Neufeld, D. 2009. Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 4, 9--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gartner Inc. 2007. Gartner EXP Says Organizations Must Evaluate Learning and Training Programs to Gauge Return on Investment. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=505592. Accessed October 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh, R. 2005. Understanding Free Software Developers: Findings from the FLOSS Study. In Making Sense of the Bazaar: Perspectives on Open Source and Free Software, MIT Press, Ed., Cambridge, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gold, A. 2007. Open Source Solutions: Seek Value Beyond Cost. Accessed 1 May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hale, R. 2000. To Match or Mis-Match? The Dynamics of Mentoring as a Route to Personal and Organisational Learning. Career Development International 5, 4/5, 223--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamlin, R. G. and Sage, L. 2011. Behavioural criteria of perceived mentoring effectiveness: An empirical study of effective and ineffective mentor and mentee behaviour within formal mentoring relationships. Journal of European Industrial Training 35, 8, 752--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Izquierdo-Cortazar, D., Robles, G., Ortega, F., and Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M. 2009. Using Software Archaeology to Measure Knowledge Loss in Software Projects Due to Developer Turnover. In 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ke, W. and Zhang, P. 2009. Motivations in Open Source Software Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 13, 4, 39--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kram, K. E. 1988. Mentoring at work. Developmental relationships in organizational life. Univ. Pr. of America, Lanham, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lankau, M. J. and Scandura, T. A. 2002. An investigation of personal learning in mentoring relationships: content, antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal 45, 4, 779--790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, Y., Tan, C.-H., Teo, H.-H., and Mattar, A. T. 2006. Motivating Open Source Software Developers: Influence of Transformational and Transactional Leaderships. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future - SIGMIS CPR '06. ACM Press, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Netcraft. 2011. June 2011 Web Server Survey. http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/web-server-survey/. Accessed 13 June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Qureshi, I. and Fang, Y. 2010. Socialization in Open Source Software Projects: A Growth Mixture Modeling Approach. Organizational Research Methods 14, 1, 208--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Shah, S. K. 2006. Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development. Management Science 52, 7, 1000--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Singh, P. V., Tan, Y., and Youn, N. 2010. A Hidden Markov Model of Developer Learning Dynamics in Open Source Software Projects. Information Systems Research. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. van Liere, D. W. 2009. Title How Shallow is a Bug? Why Open Source Communities Shorten the Repair Time of Software Defects. In ICIS 2009 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Train and retain: the impact of mentoring on the retention of FLOSS developers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research
      May 2012
      224 pages
      ISBN:9781450311106
      DOI:10.1145/2214091

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader