skip to main content
10.1145/2213836.2213946acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient transaction processing in SAP HANA database: the end of a column store myth

Published:20 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The SAP HANA database is the core of SAP's new data management platform. The overall goal of the SAP HANA database is to provide a generic but powerful system for different query scenarios, both transactional and analytical, on the same data representation within a highly scalable execution environment. Within this paper, we highlight the main features that differentiate the SAP HANA database from classical relational database engines. Therefore, we outline the general architecture and design criteria of the SAP HANA in a first step. In a second step, we challenge the common belief that column store data structures are only superior in analytical workloads and not well suited for transactional workloads. We outline the concept of record life cycle management to use different storage formats for the different stages of a record. We not only discuss the general concept but also dive into some of the details of how to efficiently propagate records through their life cycle and moving database entries from write-optimized to read-optimized storage formats. In summary, the paper aims at illustrating how the SAP HANA database is able to efficiently work in analytical as well as transactional workload environments.

References

  1. S. K. Cha and C. Song. P*TIME: Highly scalable OLTP DBMS for managing update-intensive stream workload. In VLDB, pages 1033--1044, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Färber, S. K. Cha, J. Primsch, C. Bornhövd, S. Sigg, and W. Lehner. SAP HANA database - data management for modern business applications. SIGMOD Record, 40(4):45--51, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Graefe. Query evaluation techniques for large databases. ACM Comput. Surv., 25(2):73--170, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Große, W. Lehner, T. Weichert, F. Färber, and W.-S. Li. Bridging two worlds with RICE integrating R into the SAP in-memory computing engine. PVLDB, 4(12):1307--1317, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Hill and A. Ross. Reducing outer joins. VLDB J., 18(3):599--610, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Jaecksch, F. Färber, F. Rosenthal, and W. Lehner. Hybrid Data-Flow Graphs for Procedural Domain-Specific Query Languages. In SSDBM Conference, pages 577--578, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. Jaecksch, W. Lehner, and F. Färber. A plan for OLAP. In EDBT conference, pages 681--686, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Legler, W. Lehner, and A. Ross. Data mining with the sap netweaver bi accelerator. In VLDB, pages 1059--1068, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Lemke, K.-U. Sattler, F. Färber, and A. Zeier. Speeding up queries in column stores - a case for compression. In DaWak, pages 117--129, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Paradies, C. Lemke, H. Plattner, W. Lehner, K.-U. Sattler, A. Zeier, and J. Krüger. How to juggle columns: an entropy-based approach for table compression. In IDEAS, pages 205--215, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Plattner. A common database approach for OLTP and OLAP using an in-memory column database. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 1--2, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. Plattner and A. Zeier. In-Memory Data Management: An Inflection Point for Enterprise Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Stonebraker, S. Madden, D. J. Abadi, S. Harizopoulos, N. Hachem, and P. Helland. The end of an architectural era (it's time for a complete rewrite). In VLDB, pages 1150--1160, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Transier and P. Sanders. Engineering basic algorithms of an in-memory text search engine. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 29(1):2, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Willhalm, N. Popovici, Y. Boshmaf, H. Plattner, A. Zeier, and J. Schaffner. SIMD-scan: ultra fast in-memory table scan using on-chip vector processing units. Proc. VLDB, 2:385--394, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Winslett. Bruce Lindsay Speaks Out. SIGMOD Record, 34:71, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient transaction processing in SAP HANA database: the end of a column store myth

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMOD '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
            May 2012
            886 pages
            ISBN:9781450312479
            DOI:10.1145/2213836

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 May 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGMOD '12 Paper Acceptance Rate48of289submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader