skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208535acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tackling dilemmas in supporting 'the whole person' in online patient communities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online health communities that engage the patient as a whole person attend to personal and medical needs in a holistic manner. Whether current communities structure interaction between health professionals and patients to address the whole person is an open question. To gain insights into this question, we examined a sample of online patient communities to understand health professionals' involvement in bringing in medical advice into peer-patient conversations. We found the communities fall short in supporting the whole person, because (1) patient expertise and clinical expertise generated by health professionals are shared separately, and (2) patients' quantified data are separate from narrative experiences. Such separation in the design of these systems can lead to limitations in addressing patients' interwoven medical and personal concerns. We discuss dilemmas and design implications for supporting the whole person in online patient communities.

References

  1. Anderson, R. M., Funnell, M. M., Butler, P. M., Arnold, M. S., Fitzgerald, J. T., and Feste, C. C. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 18, 7 (1995), 943.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brown, J., Weston, W., and Stewart, M. The first component: exploring both the disease and the illness experience. Patient-centered Medicine. Transforming the Clinical Method 2, 3--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., and Andersson, G. Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological medicine 40, 12 (2010), 1943--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frost, J. H. and Massagli, M. P. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another's data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10, 3 (2008), e15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hartzler, A. and Pratt, W. Managing the Personal Side of Health: How Patient Expertise Differs from the Expertise of Clinicians. JMIR 13, 3 (2011), e62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huh, J. Collaborative Help for Individualized Problems: Learning from the MythTV User Community and Diabetes Patient Support Groups. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kleinman, A., Eisenberg, L., and Good, B. Culture, Illness, and Care: Clinical Lessons from Anthropologic and Cross-Cultural Research. Ann Intern Med 88, 2 (1978), 251--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Levenstein, J. H., McCracken, E. C., McWhinney, I. R., Stewart, M. A., and Brown, J. B. The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 1. A Model for the Doctor-Patient Interaction in Family Medicine. Family Practice 3, 1 (1986), 24--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lindsay, S. and Smith, S. The health impact of an online heart disease support group: a comparison of moderated versus unmoderated support. Health Education Research 24, 4 (2009), 646--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lorig, K., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D. D., et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes care 33, 6 (2010), 1275--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Plaisant, C., Mushlin, R., Snyder, A., Li, J., Heller, D., and Shneiderman, B. LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records. AMIA, (1998), 76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Preece, J. Empathic communities: Reaching out across the web. Interactions 5, 2 (1998), 32--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Smith, B. K., Frost, J., Albayrak, M., and Sudhakar, R. Integrating glucometers and digital photography as experience capture tools to enhance patient understanding and communication of diabetes self-management practices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 4 (2006), 273--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Willett, W., Heer, J., Hellerstein, J., and Agrawala, M. CommentSpace. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 3131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wolf, G. Know Thyself: Tracking Every Facet of Life, from Sleep to Mood to Pain, 24/7/365. Wired Magazine, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tackling dilemmas in supporting 'the whole person' in online patient communities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2012
        3276 pages
        ISBN:9781450310154
        DOI:10.1145/2207676

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 May 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader