Unlocking the expressivity of point lights

ABSTRACT

Small point lights (e.g., LEDs) are used as indicators in a wide variety of devices today, from digital watches and toasters, to washing machines and desktop computers. Although exceedingly simple in their output - varying light intensity over time - their design space can be rich. Unfortunately, a survey of contemporary uses revealed that the vocabulary of lighting expression in popular use today is small, fairly unimaginative, and generally ambiguous in meaning. In this paper, we work through a structured design process that points the way towards a much richer set of expressive forms and more effective communication for this very simple medium. In this process, we make use of five different data gathering and evaluation components to leverage the knowledge, opinions and expertise of people outside our team. Our work starts by considering what information is typically conveyed in this medium. We go on to consider potential expressive forms -- how information might be conveyed. We iteratively refine and expand these sets, concluding with ideas gathered from a panel of designers. Our final step was to make use of thousands of human judgments, gathered in a crowd-sourced fashion (265 participants), to measure the suitability of different expressive forms for conveying different information content. This results in a set of recommended light behaviors that mobile devices, such as smartphones, could readily employ.

References

1. Amazon Mechanical Turk. http://www.mturk.com
2. Android API, "Adding flashing lights." Retrieved September 13, 2011. http://developer.android.com/ guide/topics/ui/notifiers/notifications.html#Lights.
3. Arons, B. SpeechSkimmer: interactively skimming recorded speech. In Proc. UIST '93, 187--196.
4. Baumann, K. and Thomas, B. (2001). User Interface Design of Electronic Appliances, 1st Ed. CRC Press.
5. Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A., and Greenberg, R. M. Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Human-Comp. Inter. 4, 1 (1989), 11--44.
6. Brewster, S. and Brown, L. M. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proc. Australasian User Interface '04. 15--23.
7. Brewster, S. A., Wright, P. C. and Edwards, A. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory humancomputer interfaces. In Proc. CHI '93. 222--227.
8. Chen, C., Forlizzi, J., and Jennings, P. ComSlipper: an expressive design to support awareness and availability. In CHI '06 Ext. Abs. 369--374.
9. Dahley, A., Wisneski, C., and Ishii, H. Water lamp and pinwheels: ambient projection of digital information into architectural space. In Proc. CHI '98. 269--270.
10. Easterby, R. The Perception of Symbols for Machine Displays. Ergonomics 13, 1 (1970), 149--158.
11. Enriquez, M. J. and MacLean, K. E. The Hapticon Editor: A Tool in Support of Haptic Communication Research. In Proc. HAPTICS '03. 356--362.
12. Gaver, W. Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Compute Interfaces. Human-Comp. Interac. 2, 2 (1986), 167--177.
13. Gaver, W. The Sonic Finder: An Interface that Uses Auditory Icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 1 (1989), 67--94.
14. Hankinson, J. C. and Edwards, A. D. Designing earcons with musical grammars. SIGCAPH Comput. Phys. Handicap. 65 (Sep. 1999), 16--20.
15. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S. E. Texture displays: a passive approach to tactile presentation. In Proc. CHI '09. 2261--2264.
16. Harrison, C., Hsieh, G., Willis, K. D. D., Forlizzi, J. and Hudson, S. E. Kineticons: using iconographic motion in graphical user interface design. In Proc. CHI '11. 1999--2008
17. Holmquist L. E., and Skog, T. Informative art: information visualization in everyday environments. In Proc. GRAPHITE '03. 229--235.
18. Huppi, B. Q., Stringer, C. J., Bell, J. and Capener, C. J. United States Patent 6658577: Breathing status LED indicator, 2003.
19. Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., and Suh, B. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proc. CHI '08. 453--456.
20. Lee, S. H., and Blake, R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science, 284 (1999). 11651168.
21. Lim, B. Y. Shick, A., Harrison, C., and Hudson, S. E. Pediluma: motivating physical activity through contextual information and social influence. In Proc. TEI '11. 173--180.
22. Lodding, K. Iconic Interfacing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 3, 2 (1983), 11--20.
23. MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E. D., Voida, S., Hansen, K. M, Tullio, J., Corso, G. M., Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays. In Proc. UIST '01. 41--50.
24. Mankoff, J., Dey, A. K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S. and Ames. M. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In Proc. CHI '03. 169--176.
25. Pintus, A. V. Tangible lightscapes. In Proc. TEI '10. 379--380.
26. Pintus, A. V. A collection of light behaviours (video). Retrieved Sept. 7, 2011. http://vimeo.com/8612242
27. Rzeszotarski, J. and Kittur, A., Instrumenting the crowd: Using implicit behavioral measures to predict task performance. In Proc. UIST '11. 13--22.
28. Seitinger, S., Taub, D. M. and Taylor, A. S. Light bodies: exploring interactions with responsive lights. In Proc. TEI '10. 113--120.
29. Weiser, M. and Brown, J. S. 1997. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing. Denning P. J. and Metcalfe, R. M. (eds), Springer-Verlag. 75--85.
30. Wessolek, D. 2008. Semiotic Foundations of Illuminants as Time-Based Medium in Space: Experiments and Artifacts. MFA Thesis, Bauhaus University Weimar, Germany.
31. Wessolek, D. Bouncing glow: methods of creating content elements for one-pixel-displays. In Proc. TEI '11. 443--444.
32. Williams, A., Farnham, S., and Counts, S. Exploring wearable ambient displays for social awareness. In CHI '06 Ext. Abs. 1529--1534.

Index Terms

• Hardware

  • Communication hardware, interfaces and storage

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)