ABSTRACT
We report on an empirical study where we cut off email usage for five workdays for 13 information workers in an organization. We employed both quantitative measures such as computer log data and ethnographic methods to compare a baseline condition (normal email usage) with our experimental manipulation (email cutoff). Our results show that without email, people multitasked less and had a longer task focus, as measured by a lower frequency of shifting between windows and a longer duration of time spent working in each computer window. Further, we directly measured stress using wearable heart rate monitors and found that stress, as measured by heart rate variability, was lower without email. Interview data were consistent with our quantitative measures, as participants reported being able to focus more on their tasks. We discuss the implications for managing email better in organizations.
- Acharya, U. R., Joseph, K. P., Kannathal, N., Lim, C. M., and Suri, J. S. Heart rate variability: A review. Medical & Bio Engineering & Comp 44, 12 (2006), 1031--1051.Google Scholar
- Barley, S., Myerson, D., and Grodel, S. E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science 22, 4 (2011), 887--906. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I., and Grinter, R. E. Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. HumanComputer Interaction 20, 1 (2005), 89--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Berntson, G. G. and Cacioppo, J. T. Heart rate variability: Stress and psychiatric conditions. In M. Malik and A. J. Camm (Eds.), Dynamic Electrocardiography, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
- Berntson, G., Bigger, J., Eckberg, D., Grossman, P., Kaufmann, P., Malik, M., Nagaraja, H., Porges, S., Saul, J., Stone, P., and van der Molen, M. Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 34, 6 (1997), 623--648.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bluedorn, A., Kalliath, T., Strube, M., and Martin, G. Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. J of Managerial Psychology 14, 3/4 (1999), 205--231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boutcher, S. H., Nugent, F. W., McLaren, P. F., and Weltman, A. L. Heart period variability of trained and untrained men at rest and during mental challenge. Psychophysiology 35, 1 (1998), 16--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 175--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proc. INTERACT 2001, IOS Press (2001), 263--269.Google Scholar
- Dabbish, L. A. and Kraut, R. E. Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 431--440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fogarty, J., Hudson, S. E., Atkeson, C. G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J. C., and Yang, J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- González, V. M. and Mark, G. "Constant, constant, multitasking craziness": Managing multiple working spheres. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 113--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- González, V.M., Nardi, B., and Mark, G. Ensembles: Understanding the instantiation of activities. Information Tech & People 22, 2 (2009), 109--131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gorman, J. M. and Sloan, R. P. Heart rate variability in depressive and anxiety disorders. American Heart Journal 140, 4, Part B (2000), 77--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988), 239--250.Google Scholar
- Hewlett, S. A. and Luce, C. B. Extreme jobs: The dangerous allure of the 70-hour workweek. Harvard Business Review 84, 12 (2006), 49--59, 162.Google Scholar
- Hjortskov, N. Rissén, D., Blangsted, A., Fallentin, N., Lundberg, U., and Søgaard, K. The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. Eur J of Appl Phys 92, 1-2 (2004), 84--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proc. AVI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 32--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, T., Dawson, R., and Wilson, D. Reducing the effect of email interruptions on employees. International J of Information Management 23, 1 (2003), 55--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klosterman, C. My zombie, myself: Why modern life feels rather undead. The New York Times, Dec. 3, 2010.Google Scholar
- Mark, G., González, V., and Harris, J. No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 321--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mintzberg, H. Structured observation as a method to study managerial work. J Mgt Stud 7, 1 (1970), 87--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nair, R., Voida, S., and Mynatt, E. D. Frequency-based detection of task switches. In Proc. HCI 2005. Springer (2005), 94--99.Google Scholar
- Perlow, L. A. The time famine: Towards a sociology of work time. Admin Sci Quarterly 44, 1 (1999), 57--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Renaud, K., Ramsay, J., and Hair, M. "You've got email!" & shall I deal with it now? Electronic mail from the recipient's perspective. IJHCI 21, 3 (2006), 313--332.Google Scholar
- Robbins, S. Tips for mastering e-mail overload. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge (2004, Oct 25). http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4438.html.Google Scholar
- Stein, P. K., Ehsani, A. A., Domitrovich, P. P., Kleiger, R. E., and Rottman, J. N. Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in healthy older adults. American Heart Journal 138, 3 (1999), 567--576.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Turkle, S. Alone Together. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
- Wacjman, J. and Rose, E. Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies 32, 7 (2011), 941--961.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, S., and Sidner, C. Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. In Proc. CHI 1996, ACM Press (1996), 276--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yeragani, V. K., Sobolewski, E., Igel, G., Johnson, C., Jampala, V. C., Kay, J., Hillman, N., Yeragani, S., and Vempati, S. Decreased heart-period variability in patients with panic disorder: A study of Holter ECG records. Psychiatry Research 78, 1-2 (1998), 89--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- "A pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email
Recommendations
Email Makes You Sweat: Examining Email Interruptions and Stress Using Thermal Imaging
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWorkplace environments are characterized by frequent interruptions that can lead to stress. However, measures of stress due to interruptions are typically obtained through self-reports, which can be affected by memory and emotional biases. In this paper,...
Email Duration, Batching and Self-interruption: Patterns of Email Use on Productivity and Stress
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWhile email provides numerous benefits in the workplace, it is unclear how patterns of email use might affect key workplace indicators of productivity and stress. We investigate how three email use patterns: duration, interruption habit, and batching, ...
Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications
CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingA common assumption in studies of interruptions is that one is focused in an activity and then distracted by other stimuli. We take the reverse perspective and examine whether one might first be in an attentional state that makes one susceptible to ...
Comments