ABSTRACT
We examine the possibility of distributed sensemaking: improving a user's sensemaking by leveraging previous users' work without those users directly collaborating or even knowing one another. We asked users to engage in sensemaking by organizing and annotating web search results into "knowledge maps," either with or without previous users' maps to work from. We also recorded gaze patterns as users examined others' knowledge maps. Our findings show the conditions under which distributed sensemaking can improve sensemaking quality; that a user's sensemaking process is readily apparent to a subsequent user via a knowledge map; and that the organization of content was more useful to subsequent users than the content itself, especially when those users had differing goals. We discuss the role distributed sensemaking can play in schema induction by helping users make a mental model of an information space and make recommendations for new tool and system development.
- Amershi, S., & Morris, M. R. CoSearch: A system for co-located collaborative Web search. In Proc. CHI, 2008, 1647--1656. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baldonado, M. Q. W., & Winograd, T. SenseMaker: An information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. Proc. CHI, 1997, 11--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Billman, D., & Bier, E. Medical sensemaking with entity workspace. In Proc. CHI, 2007, 229--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science 5, 2 (1981), 121--152.Google Scholar
- Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. J. of Reading, 27(1), 44--47.Google Scholar
- Evans, B. M., & Chi, E. H. Towards a model of understanding social search. Proc. CSCW, 2008, 485--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erickson, T., Smith, D., Kellogg, W., Laff, M., Richards, J., & Bradner, E. (1999). Social translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of "babble". In Proc. CHI 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science 7, 2 (1983), 155--170.Google Scholar
- Giles, G. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438 (2005), 900--901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Golder, S. & Huberman, B. (2006). Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science. 32(2). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gotz, D. The ScratchPad: Sensemaking support for the web. In Proc. WWW, 2007, 1329--1330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hu, N., Pavlou, P., & Zhang, J. (2006). Can Online Reviews Reveal a Product's True Quality? Empirical Findings and Analytical Modeling of Online Word-ofMouth Communication. In Proc. EC, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hummel, J. E. and Holyoak, K. J. A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review 110, 2 (2003), 220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keel, P. E. EWall: A visual analytics environment for collaborative sense-making. Information Visualization, 6 (2007), 48--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kellar, M., Watters, C., & Shepherd, M. (2007). A Field Study Characterizing Web-Based Information-Seeking Tasks. J. of American Society for Information Science, 58(7), 999--1018. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kittur, A., Chi, E., & Suh, B. (2008). Can You Even Trust a Wiki? Impacting Perceived Trustworthiness in Wikipedia. In Proc. CSCW 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Little, G., Lydia, B., Chilton, M., & Miller, R. (2010). Exploring Iterative and Parallel Human Computation Processes. In Proc. HCOMP, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R. A survey of collaborative Web search practices, In Proc. CHI 2008, 1657--1660. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., & Horvitz, E. SearchTogether: An interface for collaborative Web search. In Proc. UIST 2008, 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J., Clemmensen, T., & Yssing, C. (2002). Getting access to what goes on in people's head: reflections on the think-aloud technique. In Proc. CHI 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul, S. A., & Morris, M. R. CoSense: Enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search. In Proc. CHI, 2009, 1771--1780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul, S. A., & Reddy, M. (2010). Understanding Together: Sensemaking in Collaborative Information Seeking. In Proc. CSCW 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pirolli, P. Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29 (2005), 343--373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pirolli, P., Wollny, E., & Suh, B. (2009). So you know you're getting the best possible information: A tool that increases Wikipedia credibility. In Proc. CHI 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qu, Y. (2003). A sensemaking-supporting information gathering system. In CHI EA 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., Card, S. K. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proc. CHI, 1993, 269--276. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shneiderman, B. (2000). Designing trust into online experiences. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 57--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suthers, D. D. Collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. In Proc. HICSS-38, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Umapathy, K. Requirements to support collaborative sensemaking. In CSCW CIS Workshop, 2010.Google Scholar
- Whitaker, S. Making sense of sensemaking, in HCI remixed: Reflections on the works that have influenced the HCI community, MIT Press, Boston, MA, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Distributed sensemaking: improving sensemaking by leveraging the efforts of previous users
Recommendations
Geographically distributed sensemaking: developing understanding in forum-based software development teams
CHASE '15: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software EngineeringGlobal software development is becoming increasingly popular. Working in geographically distributed teams affords advantages to both employer and employee alike. Despite this, distributed working remains a point of contention for many organisations, ...
A resources model for distributed sensemaking
In the field of naturalistic decision making, the data---frame model (DFM) has proven to be a popular and useful way of thinking about sensemaking. DFM provides a parsimonious account of how `sensemakers' interact with the data in their environment to ...
An exploratory study of middle school students' sensemaking in a collaborative game design educational project
ASIST '13: Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information BoundariesThe purpose of this study is to understand collaborative sensemaking processes among middle school students in a discovery based hybrid e-learning environment. Our exploratory study reports interview findings on student experiences, and contributes to ...
Comments