skip to main content
article
Free Access

Analyzing due process in the workplace

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 1986Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Every office is an open system, and the products of office work are the result of decentralized negotiations. Changing patterns of task organization and alliance inevitably give rise to inconsistent knowledge bases and procedures. This implies that there are no globally correct answers to problems addressed by OISs. Rather, systems must deal with multiple competing, possibly irreconcilable, solutions. Articulating alternative solutions is the problem of due process. This problem and its consequences are illustrated by a case study of a rate-setting group in a large health insurance firm.

There is no formal solution to the problem of due process. But it must be solved in practice if distributed intelligent OISs are to be developed. We propose an alternative approach based on the work of social scientists concerned with analyzing analogous problems in human organization. Solution of the due process problem hinges on developing local closures to the problem faced by an organization. This means analyzing (a) local, tacit knowledge and its transfer ability; (b) articulation work, that is, reconciling incommensurate assumptions and procedures.

References

  1. 1 AGHA, G.A. Actors: A model of concurrent computation in distributed systems. Tech. Rep. 844, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 BECKER, H.S. Sociological Work. Aldine, Chicago, Ill., 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 BECKER, H.S. Art Worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 BENDIFALLAH, S., AND SCACCHI, W. Understanding software maintenance work. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., SE-I3 1 (1987). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 BUCHER, R., AND STELLING, J. Becoming Professional. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 COLLINS, H. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Sage, London, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 FUJIMURA, J. The construction of doable problems in cancer research. In Social Studies of Science, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 GASSER, L. The social dynamics of routine computer use in complex organizations. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Information and Computer Science, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 GERSON, E.M. Scientific work and social worlds. Knowledge, 4 (1983), 357-377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 GERSON, E.M. Information systems in complex organizations: Challenges for research. Paper presented to the ACM, San Francisco, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 GERSON, E.M. Data structures for sociological research. Tremont Tech. Rep., Tremont Research Institute, San Francisco, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 GERSON, E. M., AND STAR, S.L. Practical reasoning: The plausibility of arguments. Report submitted to the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 GERSON, E. M., AND STAR, S. L. Representation and re-representation in scientific work. Tremont Tech. Rep., Tremont Research Institute, San Francisco, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 HAYES-ROTH, F., WATERMAN, D. A., AND LENAT, D. B. (Eds.) Building Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 HEWITT, C. Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages. Artif. InteU., 8, 3 (1977), 323-364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 HEWITT, C. Towards new foundations for intelligent systems. Submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 HEWlTT, C. The challenge of open systems. BYTE, I0 (April 1985), 223-242. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 HEWITT, C., AND DEJONG, P. Analyzing the roles of descriptions and actions in open systems. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Washington, D.C., Aug.). AAAI, 1983, pp. 162-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 HEWITT, C., AND DEJONG, P. Open systems. In Conceptual Modelling, M. Brodie et al., Eds. Springer Verlag, New York, 1984, pp. 147-164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 HEWlTT, C., REINHARDT, T., AGHA, G., AND ATTARDI, G. Linguistic support of receptionists for shared resources. MIT Artificial Intelligence Memo 781, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 HUGHES, E.C. The Sociological Eye. Aldine, Chicago, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 JAZZAR, A., AND SCACCHI, W. Computer systems documentation: An unknown quantity. Submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 KENT, W. Data and Reality. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 KLXNG, R., AND GERSON, E.M. The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction, 1 (1978a), 132-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 KLING, R., AND GERSON, E. M. Patterns of segmentation and intersection in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction, 1 (1978b), 24-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 KLING, R., AND SCACCHI, W. The web of computing: Computing technology as social organization. Advances in Computers, 21 (1982), 3-85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 KORNFELD, W., AND HEWlTT, C. The scientific community metaphor. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., SMC-I I (1981), 24-33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 LATOUR, B. Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. In Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture, Past and Present, H. Kucklick, Ed. Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 LATOUR, B., AND WOOLGAR, S. Laboratory Life. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 LAW, J. Les textes and leur alliGs. Culture Technique, 14 (1985), 59-69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31 LAW, J. Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the portuguese expansion. In Proceedings of the Workshop on New Developments in the Social Study of Technology, T. Pinch and W. Bijker, Eds. Enschede, Holland, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32 LYNCH, M. Art and Artefact in Laboratory Science. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33 POLANVl, M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Harper & Row, New York, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 SCACCHI, W. Managing software engineering projects: A social analysis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-IO (1984), 49-59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35 SCACCHI, W. The system factory approach to VLS! and software engineering. In Proceedings AFCET Second Software Engineering Conference (Nice, France). AFCET, 1984, pp. 349-359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36 SCACCHI, W., GASSER, L., AND GERSON, E.M. Problems and strategies in organizing computeraided design work. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (San Jose, Calif., Sept.). IEEE, New York, 1983, pp. 166-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37 SCHON, D. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 SIMON, H. The structure of ill-structured problems. Artif. Intell., 4 (1973), 181-201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39 STAR, S. L. Scientific theories as going concerns: The development of the localizationist perspective in neurophysiology, 1870-1906. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Social and Behavioral Science, Univ. of Caliibrnia, San Francisco, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. 40 STAR, S. L. Simplification in scientific work: An example from neuroscience research. Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983), 205-228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. 41 STAR, S.L. Tradeoffs in scientific work: Report on a robotics design project. Presented to the ACM, San Francisco, October, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42 STAR, S.L. Scientific work and uncertainty. Social Studies of Science, I5 (1985), 391-427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. 43 STAR, S.L. Articulation work and discretion. Report submitted to the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. 44 STAR, S.L. Triangulating clinical and basic research: British localizationists, 1870-1906. History of Science, 24 (1986), 29-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45 STAR, S. L., AND GERSON, E.M. The management and dynamics of anomalies in scientific research, The Sociological Quarterly, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. 46 STRAUSS, A.L. Professions, Work and Careers. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, N.J., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 47 STRAUSS, A.L. Negotiations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. 48 STRAUSS, A.L. Work and the division of labor. The Sociol. Quart., 26 (1985), 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. 49 STRAUSS, A.L. Articulation work, The Sociological Quarterly, forthcominig.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. 50 STRAUSS, A. L., FAGERHAUGH, S., WIENER, C., AND SUZCEK, B. The Social Organization o{ Medical Work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing due process in the workplace

                            Recommendations

                            Comments

                            Login options

                            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                            Sign in

                            Full Access

                            • Published in

                              cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
                              ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 4, Issue 3
                              Special issue: selected papers from the conference on office information systems
                              July 1986
                              103 pages
                              ISSN:1046-8188
                              EISSN:1558-2868
                              DOI:10.1145/214427
                              Issue’s Table of Contents

                              Copyright © 1986 ACM

                              Publisher

                              Association for Computing Machinery

                              New York, NY, United States

                              Publication History

                              • Published: 1 July 1986
                              Published in tois Volume 4, Issue 3

                              Permissions

                              Request permissions about this article.

                              Request Permissions

                              Check for updates

                              Qualifiers

                              • article

                            PDF Format

                            View or Download as a PDF file.

                            PDF

                            eReader

                            View online with eReader.

                            eReader