skip to main content
10.1145/2185677.2185699acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Distributed sparse approximation for frog sound classification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sparse approximation has now become a buzzword for classification in numerous research domains. We propose a distributed sparse approximation method based on l1 minimization for frog sound classification, which is tailored to the resource constrained wireless sensor networks. Our pilot study demonstrates that l1 minimization can run on wireless sensor nodes producing satisfactory classification accuracy.

References

  1. M. Figueiredo, R. Nowak, and S. Wright. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: Application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, 1(4):587--596, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Wright, A. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. Sastry, and Y. Ma. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 31(2):210--227, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Distributed sparse approximation for frog sound classification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IPSN '12: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
      April 2012
      354 pages
      ISBN:9781450312271
      DOI:10.1145/2185677

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader