ABSTRACT
There are many web sites that allow people to play board or card games against other human players. These sites offer tools and opportunities for social interaction, but little is known about how people really interact on these sites. To learn more about social dynamics on game sites, we analysed three months of log files from a large site to explore three themes: permanence (whether people formed a long-term association with the site); social interaction (in terms of shared activity and verbal communication); and formation of ties (whether people made contacts with others). Our analyses showed that while the site seems very social when we consider gameplay, the population was highly transient, and people talked very little. To explain these behaviours, we suggest that games and game-based activity should be considered as a legitimate form of human interaction. Our analysis provides new information and new ways of thinking about how game environments can be designed to support many kinds of sociability.
- Bérubé, A. The History of Gay Bathhouses. Journal of Homosexuality 44, 3 (2003), 33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Blanchard, A., and Markus, M. The experienced "sense" of a virtual community. SIGMIS Database, 35, 1, 2004, 64--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brown, B. and Bell, M. Play and Sociability in There: Lessons from Online Games for Collaborative Virtual Environments. In R. Schroeder and A. Axelsson, eds., Avatars at Work and Play. Springer, 2006, 227--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernheim Brush, A., Wang, X., Combs Turner, T., and Smith, M. Assessing differential usage of usenet social accounting meta-data. Proc. CHI 2005, 889--898. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, H. Using language. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dourish, P. Introduction: The state of play. JCSCW, 7, 1, 1998, 1--7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Driskell, R. and Lyon, L. Are Virtual Communities True Communities? Examining the Environments and Elements of Community. City & Community, 1, 4, 2002, 373--390.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R., Nickell, E. Virtual "Third Places": A Case Study of Sociability in Massively Multiplayer Games. JCSCW, 16, 1--2, 2007, 129--166. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., Moore, R. "Alone together?": exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Proc. CHI 2006, 407--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proc. CSCW 1996, 67--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haubrich, D., Myers, T., Calzavara, L., Ryder, K., and Medved, W. Gay and bisexual men's experiences of bathhouse culture and sex. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6, 1, 2004, 19--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jones, Q. Virtual Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline. JCMC, 3, 3, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kolo, C. and Baur, T. Living a Virtual Life: Social Dynamics of Online Gaming. Game Studies, 4, 1, 2004, 1--31.Google Scholar
- McMillan, D. and Chavis, D. Sense of community: A definition and theory. J. Community. Psych., 14, 1, 1986, 6--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muramatsu, J. and Ackerman, M. Computing, social activity, and entertainment: A field study of a game MUD. JCSCW, 7, 1, 1998, 87--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nardi, B. and Harris, J. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. Proc. CSCW 2006, 149--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pace, T., Bardzell, S., and Bardzell, J. The rogue in the lovely black dress: intimacy in world of warcraft. Proc. CHI 2010, 233--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Park, R. Human Ecology. Am. J. Soc. 17, 1, 1936, 1--15.Google Scholar
- Simmel, G. The sociology of sociability. Am. J. Soc., 55, 3, 1949, 254--261.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stenros, J. and Waern, A. Games as activity: Correcting the digital fallacy. In M. Evans, ed., Videogame Studies: Concepts, Cultures and Communication. Inter-Disciplinary Press, Oxford, 2011.Google Scholar
- Stenros, J., Paavilainen, J., and Mäyrä, F. The many faces of sociability and social play in games. Proc. MindTrek 2009, 82--89. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. Virtual communities as communities. In M. Smith and P. Kollock, eds., Communities in cyberspace. 1999, 167--194.Google Scholar
- Williams, D., Ducheneaut, N., Xiong, L., Zhang, Y., Yee, N., and Nickell, E. From Tree House to Barracks. Games and Culture, 1, 4 (2006), 338--361.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- "I'm just here to play games": social dynamics and sociality in an online game site
Recommendations
The many faces of sociability and social play in games
MindTrek '09: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous EraIn the past, social interaction has been discussed mostly in the context of multiplayer games, ignoring the implicit forms of sociability in single player games. This paper distinguishes between the sociability around the playing of a game and the ...
Social Network Games: Players' Perspectives
This article presents the results of an interview study on how people perceive and play social network games on Facebook. During recent years, social games have become the biggest genre of games if measured by the number of registered users. These games ...
Social player analytics in a Facebook health game
HCIK '15: Proceedings of HCI KoreaSocial health games can drive healthy behaviour. To track social behaviour change in social network games (SNGs), gameplay metrics should quantify socially-engaging gameplay behaviour based on player interactions. We developed social player metrics in a ...
Comments