Libby Hemphill
Jahna Otterbacher
ABSTRACT
Women and men communicate differently in both face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. We study linguistic patterns considered gendered in reviews contributed to the Internet Movie Database. IMDb has been described as a male-majority community, in which females contribute fewer reviews and enjoy less prestige than males. Analyzing reviews posted by prolific males and females, we hypothesize that females adjust their communication styles to be in sync with their male counterparts. We find evidence that while certain characteristics of "female language" persevere over time (e.g., frequent use of pronouns) others (e.g., hedging) decrease with time. Surprisingly, we also find that males often increase their use of "female" features. Our results indicate, that even when they resemble men's reviews linguistically, women's reviews still enjoy less prestige and smaller audiences.
- Adamic, L. A. and Huberman, B. A. The Web's hidden order. Communications of the ACM 44, 9 (2001), 55--59. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J. and Shimoni, A. R. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23, August 2003.Google Scholar
- Awad, N. F. and Ragowsky, A. Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth: an examination across genders. Journal of MIS 24, 4 (2008), 101--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Biber, D. Dimensions of Register Variation: a Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brown, J., Broderick, A. J. and Lee, N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21, 3 (2007), 2--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruckman, A. Gender swapping on the Internet. In Ludlow, P. (Ed.), High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual Issues in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA USA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- Bury, R. Cyberspaces of their Own: Female Fandoms Online. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, NY USA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Cassell, J. and Tversky, D. The language of online intercultural community formation in Junior Summit '98. Journal of CMC 10, 2 (2005).Google Scholar
- Coates, J. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman, 1993.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
- Collaborative Creativity Group of the United Nations University. Wikipedia Survey - Overview of Results. http://www.wikipediasurvey.org/docs/Wikipedia_Overview_15March2010-FINAL.pdf (accessed May 13, 2011).Google Scholar
- Eckert, P. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. Teachers College Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989.Google Scholar
- Farnam, S. D. and Churchill, E. F. Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online. Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2011), 359--368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Flynn, E. A. Composing as a woman. College Composition and Communication 39, 4 (1988).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K. Automated essay scoring: applications to educational technology. In Proceedings of EdMedia (1999).Google Scholar
- Gefen, D. and Ridings, C. M. If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities. ACM SIGMIS Database 36, 2 (2005), 78--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Understanding déjà reviewers. Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2010), 225--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giles, H., Coupland, J., and Coupland, N. Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J. and Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of Accommodation. Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Herring, S. C. Gender and power in online communities. In Holmes, J. and Meyeroff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender, pp. 202--228. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Herring, S. C. Posting in a different voice: gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In Ess, C. (Ed.) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Herring, S. C. The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society 15, (1999), 151--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobson, D. Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of CMC 5, 1 (1999).Google Scholar
- Kim, H.-W., Zheng, J. R. and Gupta, S. Examining knowledge contribution from the perspective of an online identity in blogging communities. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2011), 1760--1770. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lakoff, G. Hedges: a studying meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 4 (1973), 458--508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2, (1973), 45--79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Monk, T. H., Buysse, D. J., Reynolds III, C. F., Berga, S. L., Jarrett, D. B., Begley, A. E. and Kupfer, D. J. Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions. Journal of Sleep Research 6, (1997), 9--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Otterbacher, J. Inferring gender of movie reviewers: exploiting writing style, content and metadata. In Proc. CIKM. ACM Press (2010), 369--378. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preece, J. and Schneiderman, B. The Reader-to leader framework: motivation technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert, C. CMOGRAM: Stata module to plot histogram-style conditional mean or median graphs, Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics (2010).Google Scholar
- Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D. and Kelley, M. Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of CMC 2, 3 (1996).Google Scholar
- Scissors, L. E., Gill, A. J., and Gergle, D. Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC. Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2008), 277--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spender, D. The Writing or the Sex, or, Why You Don't Have to Read Women's Writing to Know it's no Good. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. You Just Don't Understand. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc, 1990.Google Scholar
- Where Are the Women in Wikipedia? Room for Debate. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/02/where-are-the-women-in-wikipedia (accessed May 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Learning the lingo?: gender, prestige and linguistic adaptation in review communities
Recommendations
Intersections of gender and sexual minority status
The present study refined existing bullying literature by examining differences in risk of three types of bullying victimization (offline only, cyberbullying only, and co-occurring victimization) for four different gender-sexual minority status groups ...
Intersectionality and cyberbullying
Display Omitted Our paper applies an intersectional approach to the study of cyberbullying.We explore the conditional impact of race, gender, and sexuality on victimization.We conducted an original survey of students in a Midwestern high school (N=752)...
Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia
The study explored cyberbullying prevalence among young adults in Malaysia.Social media emerged as the primary tool used.No significant differences for gender and age on cyberbullying activities.Internet frequency significantly predicts cyberbullying.A ...
Comments