skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Turing's Titanic machine?

Published:01 March 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Embodied and disembodied computing at the Turing Centenary.

References

  1. Ambos-Spies, K. and Fejer, P. Degrees of unsolvability. Unpublished, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andréka, H., Németi, I. and Németi, P. General relativistic hypercomputing and foundation of mathematics. Natural Computing 8, 3 (2009), 499--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beggs, E., Costa, J.F. and Tucker, J.V. Limits to measurement in experiments governed by algorithms. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 20, 6 (2010), 1019--1050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Binder, I., Braverman, M. and Yampolsky, M. Filled Julia sets with empty interior are computable. Foundations of Computational Mathematics 7, 4 (2007), 405--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brooks, R. The relationship between matter and life. Nature 409 (2001), 409--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brooks, R. The case for embodied intelligence. In Alan Turing---His Work and Impact. S.B. Cooper and J. van Leeuwen, Eds. Elsevier Science, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Calude, C.S. and Svozil, K. Quantum randomness and value indefiniteness. Advanced Science Letters 1 (2008), 165--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chaitin, G.J. Metaphysics, metamathematics and metabiology. In Randomness Through Computation: Some Answers, More Questions. H. Zenil, Ed. World Scientific, Singapore, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cooper, S.B. Emergence as a computability-theoretic phenomenon. Applied Mathematics and Computation 215, 4 (2009), 1351--1360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cooper, S.B. and Odifreddi, P. Incomputability in nature. In Computability and Models: Perspectives East and West. S.B. Cooper and S.S. Goncharov, Eds. Plenum, New York, 2003, 137--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Copeland, B.J. Even Turing machines can compute uncomputable functions. In Unconventional Models of Computation. C. Calude, J. Casti, and M. Dinneen, Eds. Springer-Verlag, 1998, 150--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, J.F., Loff, B. and Mycka, J. A foundations for real recursive function theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160, 3 (2009), 255--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Davis, M. The myth of hypercomputation. In Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker. C. Teuscher, Ed. Springer-Verlag, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. Why there is no such discipline as hypercomputation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 178 (2006), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle, and the universal quantum computer. In Proceedings of the Royal Society A400 (1985) 97--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hertling, P. Is the Mandelbrot set computable? Math. Logic Quarterly 51 (2005), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hodges, A. Alan Turing: The Enigma. Arrow, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kreisel, G. Church's thesis: A kind of reducibility axiom for constructive mathematics. In Intuitionism and Proof Theory. A. Kino, J. Myhill, and R. E. Vesley, Eds. North-Holland, 1970, 121--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leavitt, D. The Man Who Knew Too Much: Alan Turing and the Invention of the Computer. W. W. Norton, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Matiyasevich, Y. Hilbert's Tenth Problem. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Murray, J.D. Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction. 3rd Edition. Springer, NY, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Myhill, J. Creative sets. Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 1 (1955), 97--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Németi, I. and Dávid, G. Relativistic computers and the Turing barrier. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation 178 (2006), 118--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Odifreddi, P. Little steps for little feet; http://cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/1999-august/003292.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinker, S. How the Mind Works. W.W. Norton, New York, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pour-El, M.B. and Zhong, N. The wave equation with computable initial data whose unique solution is nowhere computable. Math. Logic Quarterly 43 (1997), 449--509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Prigogine, I. From Being To Becoming. W.H. Freeman, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Prigogine, I. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. Free Press, New York, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rozenberg, G., Bäck, T.B. and Kok, J.N., Eds. Handbook of Natural Computing. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Saari, D.G. and Xia, Z.J. Off to infinity in finite time. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 42, 5 (1995), 538--546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sloman, A. Some requirements for human-like robots: Why the recent over-emphasis on embodiment has held up progress. In Creating Brain-Like Intelligence LNCS 5436. B. Sendhoff et al., Eds. Springer, 2009, 248--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Smolensky, P. On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1 (1988), 1--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Teuscher, C. Turing's Connectionism. An Investigation of Neural Network Architectures. Springer-Verlag, London, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Turing, A.M. On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. In Proceedings London Mathematical Society 42 (1936), 230--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Turing, A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 237, 641 (1952), 37--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Velupillai, K.V. Uncomputability and undecidability in economic theory. Applied Mathematics and Computation 215, 4 (Oct. 2009), 1404--1416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wegner, P. and Goldin, D. The Church-Turing Thesis: Breaking the myth. In CiE: New Computational Paradigms LNCS 3526. S.B. Cooper and B. Löwe, Eds. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wiedermann, J. and van Leeuwen, J. How we think of computing today. Logic and Theory of algorithms LNCS 5028. A. Beckmann, C. Dimitracopoulos, and B. Löwe, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008, 579--593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yates, C.E.M. On the degrees of index sets. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 121 (1966), 309--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ziegler, M. Physically-relativized Church-Turing Hypotheses. Applied Mathematics and Computation 215, 4 (2009), 1431--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Turing's Titanic machine?

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Communications of the ACM
                Communications of the ACM  Volume 55, Issue 3
                March 2012
                106 pages
                ISSN:0001-0782
                EISSN:1557-7317
                DOI:10.1145/2093548
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2012 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 March 2012

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Popular
                • Refereed

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format