- 1 Band, J. and M. Katoh. Interfaces On Trial: Intellectual Property and lnteroperability in the Global Software Industry. Westview Press, Boulder, Col. (To be published). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2 Clapes, A.L. Software, Copyright, and Competition. Quorum Books, N.Y., (1989). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3 Cohen, J. Reverse engineering and the rise of electronic vigilantism: Intellectual property implications of "Lock- Out" programs. So. Calif. L. Rev., 67 (lul. 1995).Google Scholar
- 4 Computer Science and Telecommunication Board, National Research Council. Intellectual Property Issues In Software (1991).Google Scholar
- 5 Lemley, M. Intellectual property and shrinkwrap licenses, So. Calif. L. Rev., 67 (lul. 1995).Google Scholar
- 6 McManis, C.R. Intellectual property protection and reverse engineering of computer programs in the United States and the European community. High Tech. L.J. 8, 25 (1993).Google Scholar
- 7 Menell, P.S. An analysis of the scope of copyright protection for application programs. Stanford L. Rev. 41, 1045 (1989).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8 Menell, P.S. Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software. Stanford L. Rev. 39, 1329 (1987).Google Scholar
- 9 Samuelson, P., Davis, R., Kapor, M.D., and Reichman, J.H. A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia L. Rev., 94, 2308 (1994).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10 Samuelson, P. The NII intellectual property report. Commun. ACM 37, 12 (Dec. 1994), 21-27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11 Spector, A.Z. Software, interface, and implementation. JurimetricsJ. 30, 79 (1989), 12.Google Scholar
- 12 Warren-Boulton, F.R., Baseman, K.C., and Woroch, G.A. Point: Copyright protection of software can make economic sense. Comput. Lawy. 12, 10 (Feb. 1995).Google Scholar
- 13 Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, Information Infrastructure Task Force. Green Paper: Intellectual property rights and the national information infrastructure (Preliminary Draft, July 1994).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Software compatibility and the law
Comments