Frederick R. Warren-Boulton
- ARROW. K., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity, Princeton University Press. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
- ARTHUR, B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock in by historical events. Econ. J. (March).Google Scholar
- BARZEL. Y. 1968. Optimal timing of innovation. Rot,. Econ. Stat.Google Scholar
- CAI3RAL, L. SALANT, D., AND WOROCH. G. 1994. Monopoly pricing with network externalities. Draft, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- DAVID, P. 1985. Clio and the economies of QWERTY. Am. Econ. Rot,. 75, i (May), 332-337.Google Scholar
- FARRELL, J. 1989. Standardization and intellectual property. JurimetricsJ. (Fall), 35-50.Google Scholar
- FARRELL, J. AND SALONER, G. 1985. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RandJ. Econ. 16, i (Spring) 70-83.Google Scholar
- FARRELL, J. AND SALONER, G. 1992. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econ. XL, i (March) 9--34.Google Scholar
- FISHER, F. AND ROMAINE R.C. 1990. Janis Joplin's yearbook and the theory of damages. J. Account. Auditing Finance 5, 1 (Winter) 145-157.Google Scholar
- GANDAL, N. 1994. Hedonic price indexes and an empirical test for network extemalities. RandJ. Econ. (Spring).Google Scholar
- GILI3ERT, R. 1992. Symposium on compatibility: Incentives and market structure. J. Indust. Econ. XL, i (March) 1-8.Google Scholar
- GREENSTEIN, S. 1990. Creating economic advantage by setting compatibility standards: Can physical tie-ins' extend monopoly power? Econ. Innovation New Technol. 1, 63-83.Google Scholar
- KATZ, M. AND SHAPIRO, C. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev. 75, 3 (June), 42~440.Google Scholar
- KATZ, M. AND SHAPIRO, C. 1992. Product introduction with network extemalities. J. Indust. Econ. XL, i (March), 55--83.Google Scholar
- LANDES, W. AND POSNER, R. 1989. An economic analysis of copyright law. J. Legal Stud. XViII, (June), 325--363.Google Scholar
- MATUTES, C. AND REGIBEAU, P. 1988. Mix and match: Product compatibility without network externalities. Rand J. Econ. 19, 2, (Summer), 221-234.Google Scholar
- MEN~LL, P. 1987. Tailoring legal protection for computer software. Stanford Law Rev. 39 (July), 1329-1373.Google Scholar
- MENELL, P. 1989. An analysis of the scope of copyright protection for application programs. Sta~ford Law Rev. 41 (May), 1045-1104.Google Scholar
- MILLER, A. 1993. Copyright protection for computer programs, databases, and computer-generated works: Is anything new since CONTU? Harvard Law Rev. 106, 5 (March), 977-1073.Google Scholar
- SAMUELSON, P. ET AL. 1994. A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Rot,. 94.Google Scholar
- SAMt~LSON, P. 1995. An entirely new regime is needed. Comput. Lawyer 12 (Feb.), 11-17.Google Scholar
- WARREN-BOULTON, F., BASEMAN, K. AND WOROCH, G. 1995. Copyright protection of software can make economic sense. Comput. Lawyer 12, 2 (Feb.), 10, 18-28.Google Scholar
- WARREN-BOULTON, F. 1978. Vertical Control of Markets: Business and Labor Practices, Ballinger.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Economics of intellectual property protection for software: the proper role for copyright
Recommendations
Ontologies for intellectual property rights protection
Pirating various forms of intellectual property (IP) causes great economic loss to intellectual property rights (IPR) holders. IPR protection is becoming a key issue in our highly networked world. In order to further deepen our understanding of how to ...
Intellectual Property Regulation, and Software Piracy, a Predictive Model
In recent years, a number of studies have considered the impact of IPRs on software piracy, specifically TRIPS and more recently U.S. USTR 301 reporting, pursuant to the Trade Act. The work of Shadlen 2005 supports the assertion that a number of recent ...
Justifying legal protection of intellectual property: the interests argument
Whether or not intellectual property rights ought, as a matter of political morality, to be protected by the law surely depends on what kinds of interests the various parties have in intellectual content. Although theorists disagree on the limits of ...
Comments