skip to main content
10.1145/2078856.2078859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Computer science/informatics in secondary education

Published:27 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer Science (CS) Education research, specifically when focusing on secondary education, faces the difficulty of regionally differing political, legal, or curricular constraints. To date, many different studies exist that document the specific regional situations of teaching CS in secondary schools. This ITiCSE working group report documents the process of collecting, evaluating, and integrating research findings about CS in secondary schools from different countries. As an outcome, it presents a category system (Darmstadt Model), as a first step towards a framework that sup-ports future research activities in this field and that supports the transfer of results between researchers and teachers in CS education (CSE) across regional or national boundaries. Exemplary application of the Darmstadt model shows in several important categories how different the situation of CSE in secondary education in various countries can be. The Darmstadt Model (DM) is now ready for discussion and suggestions for improvement by the CSE-community.

References

  1. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, C 111 (May. 2008), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allert, H. 2005. Modeling coherent social systems for learning, Univ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Armoni, M. and Gal-Ezer, J. 2004. On the achievements of high school students studying computational models. SIGCSE Bull 36, 17--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Armoni, M., Benaya, T., Ginat, D., and Zur, E. 2010. Didactics of Introduction to Computer Science in High School. In Teaching fundamental concepts of informatics. 4th International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2010, Zurich, Switzer-land, January 13--15, 2010 ; proceedings, J. Hromkovic, R. Královic and J. Vahrenhold, Eds. Lecture notes in computer science 5941. Springer, Berlin, 36--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Baumert, J., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Dubberke, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., and et al. 2009. Professionswissen von Lehrkräften, kognitiv aktivierender Mathematikunterricht und die Entwicklung von mathematischer Kompetenz (COACTIV): Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, T., Andreae, P., and Lambert, L. 2010. Computer Science in New Zealand high schools. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 103. Australian Computer Society, Inc, Brisbane, Australia, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bennedsen, J. and Schulte, C. 2006. A Competence Model for Object Interaction in Introductory Programming. In Proceeding of 18th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 18), 215--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischof, E. 2010. Interventionen im (Informatik-)Unterricht. Ein Versuch bei SchülerInnen das Bild der Informatik zu erweitern. Klagenfurt, Alpen-Adria-Univ., Diss., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumrich, S. 2007. Schulsysteme und informatische Bildung im internationalen Vergleich. Diplomarbeit, Technische Universität.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Breier, N. and Hubwieser, P. 2002. An information-oriented approach to informatical education. Informatics in Education 1, 1, 31--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Brinda, T. and Hubwieser, P. 2010. How to teach didactics of informatics to informatics student teachers. In New developments in ICT and Informatics education, To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. S. 1960. The process of education. {a searching discussion of school education opening new paths to learning and teaching}. A Vintage book V-234. Vintage Books, New York NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Coy, W. 1997. Defining discipline. In Foundations of Computer Science, C. Freksa, M. Jantzen and R. Valk, Eds. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 21--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dagiene, V. 2005. Teaching Information Technology in General Education: Challenges and Perspectives. In From Computer Literacy to Informatics Fundamentals, 53--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dagiene, V. 2008. Teaching Information Technology and Elements of Informatics in Lower Secondary Schools: Curricula, Didactic Provision and Implementation. In Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking, Third International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2008, Torun, Poland, July 1--4, 2008. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dagiene, V. and Mittermeir, R. T., Eds. 2006. Information Technologies at School. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference ISSEP 2006. Vilnius, Lithuania. Publishing House TEV, Vilnius.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dörge, C. 2010. Competencies and skills. Filling old skins with new wine. In Key competencies in the knowledge society. Springer, Berlin {u.a.}, 78--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorninger, C. 2005. Educational Standards in School Informatics in Austria. In From Computer Literacy to Informatics Fundamentals, R. Mittermeir, Ed. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 65--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Forneck, H. J. 1990. Entwicklungstendenzen und Problemlinien der Didaktik der Informatik. In Beiträge zur Didaktik der Informatik, G. Cyranek, H. J. Forneck and H. Goorhuis, Eds. Diesterweg, Frankfurt am Main, 18--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gal-Ezer, J. and Harel, D. 1998. What (else) should CS educators know? Communications of the ACM 41, 9, 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gal-Ezer, J. and Stephenson, C. 2010. Computer science teacher preparation is critical. ACM Inroads 1, 61--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) e. V., Ed. 2008. Grundsätze und Standards für die Informatik in der Schule. Bildungsstandards Informatik für die Sekundarstufe I. Empfehlungen der Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V., erarbeitet vom Arbeitskreis Bildungsstandards, Bonn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Glendinning, I. and Low, M. 2010. Collaborative Initiatives for Promoting Computer Science in Secondary Schools. In Teaching fundamental concepts of informatics. 4th International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2010, Zurich, Switzerland, January 13--15, 2010 ; proceedings, J. Hromkovic, R. Královic and J. Vahrenhold, Eds. Lecture notes in computer science 5941. Springer, Berlin, 100--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gurbiel, E., Hardt-Olejniczak, G., Kolczyk, E., Krupicka, H., and Syslo, M. M., Eds. 2005. Informatics and ICT in Polish Education System.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hazzan, O., Dubinsky, Y., Eidelman, L., Sakhnini, V., and Teif, M. 2006. Qualitative research in computer science education. SIGCSE Bull 38, 408--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hazzan, O., Lapidot, T., and Ragonis, N. 2011. Guide to teaching computer science. An activity-based approach. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hromkovi, J. 2006. Contributing to General Education by Teaching Informatics. In Informatics Education -- The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers, R. Mittermeir, Ed. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 25--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hromkovic, J., Královic, R., and Vahrenhold, J., Eds. 2010. Teaching fundamental concepts of informatics. 4th International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2010, Zurich, Switzerland, January 13--15, 2010 ; proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science 5941. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hubwieser, P. 2000. Didaktik der Informatik: Grundlagen, Konzepte, Beispiele. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubwieser, P. 2007. A smooth way towards object oriented programming in secondary schools. In Informatics, Mathe-matics and ICT: A golden triangle: Proceedings of the Working Joint IFIP Conference: WG3.1 Secondary Education, WG3.5 Primary Education; College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA 27th--29th June 2007, D. Benzie and M. Iding, Eds., Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hubwieser, P. and Friedrich, S. 1998. Teaching informatics as a subject. In Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries, IFIP TC3 WG3.1, 3.4 & 2.5 Working Conference on Capacity Building for IT in Education in Developing Countries, 19--25 August 1997, Harare, Zimbabwe. IFIP Conference Proceedings. Chapman & Hall, 291--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hubwieser, P., Broy, M., and Brauer, W. 1997. A New Approach in Teaching Information Technologies: Shifting Emphasis form Technology to Information. In Information technology. Chapman & Hall, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Joy, M., Sinclair, J., Sun, S., Sitthiworachart, J., and López-González, J. 2009. Categorising computer science education research. Education and Information Technologies 14, 105--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kalaa, I. and Mittermeir, R. T., Eds. 2011. Informatics in Schools: Contributing to 21st Century Education. 5th International Conference on International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution and Perspectives, IS-SEP 2011, Bratislava, Slovakia, October 2011. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., Reiss, K., Riquarts, K., Rost, J., Tenorth, H.-E., and Vollmer, H. J. 2004. The Development of National Educational Standards. An Expertise. Bundesministerium für BildungundForschung, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J., and Tesch, R. 1993. Ethography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic, San Diego, Calif. ; Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., and Campanella Bracken, C. 2010. Practical Resources for Assessing and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Content Analysis Research Projects. http://astro.temple.edu/~lombard/reliability/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Magenheim, J., Nelles, W., Rhode, T., Schaper, N., Schubert, S., and Stechert, P. 2010. Competencies for informatics systems and modeling: Results of qualitative content analysis of expert interviews. In Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, 513--521.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Malmi, L., Sheard, J., Simon, Bednarik, R., Helminen, J., Korhonen, A., Myller, N., Sorva, J., and Taherkhani, A. 2010. Characterizing research in computing education: a preliminary analysis of the literature. In Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research. ICER '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung. 2007. COACTIV. Ein Forschungsprojekt zur Untersuchung von Lehrerkompetenz, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Maxwell, J. A. 2005. Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayring, P. 2000. Qualitative Content Analysis. http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-e/2-00inhalt-e.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. 2009. JIM 2009 Jugend, Information,(Multi-) Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland, Stuttgart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Micheuz, P. 2005. 20 Years of Computers and Informatics in Austria's Secondary Academic Schools. In From Computer Literacy to Informatics Fundamentals, R. Mittermeir, Ed. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 20--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif. {u.a.}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. 2006. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record 108, 6, 1017--1054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Mittermeir, R. Informatikunterricht zur Vermittlung allgemeiner Bildungswerte. OCG Schriftenreihe 2010, 271, 54--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Mittermeir, R. T. and Syslo, M. M., Eds. 2008. Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking, Third International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2008, Torun, Poland, July 1--4, 2008. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Mittermeir, R., Bischof, E., and Hodnigg, K. 2010. Showing Core-Concepts of Informatics to Kids and Their Teachers. In Teaching fundamental concepts of informatics. 4th International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2010, Zurich, Switzerland, January 13--15, 2010 ; proceedings, J. Hromkovic, R. Královic and J. Vahrenhold, Eds. Lecture notes in computer science 5941. Springer, Berlin, 143--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Mittermeir, R., Ed. 2005. From Computer Literacy to Informatics Fundamentals. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Mühling, A., Hubwieser, P., and Brinda, T. 2010. Exploring Teachers' Attitudes Towards Object Oriented Modelling and Programming in Secondary Schools. In ICER '10: Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Pre-College Task Force Comm. of the Educ. Board of the ACM, C. 1993. ACM model high school computer science curriculum. Commun. ACM 36, 87--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Randolph, J. 2008. Computer science education research at the crossroads. A methodological review of computer science education research, 2000--2005. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinsohn, S. B. 1967. Bildungsreform als Revision des Curriculum. Aktuelle Pädagogik. Luchterhand, Neuwied a.Rh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rychen, D. S. 2003. Key competencies. For a successful life and a well-functioning society. Hogrefe & Huber, Cambridge Mass. u.a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Schubert, S. and Stechert, P. 2010. Competence model research on informatics system application. In New developments in ICT and Education. Workshop of WG 3.1, June 28--30, 2010 Amiens, IFIP, Ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwill, A. 1993. Fundamental Ideas of Computer Science. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, Feb., 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Starruß, I. 2010. Synopse zum Informatikunterricht in Deutschland. Analyse der informatischen Bildung an allgemein bildenden Schulen auf der Basis der im Jahr 2010 gültigen Lehrpläne und Richtlinien. Bakkalaureatsarbeit, Technischen Universität Dresden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Stephenson, C., Gal-Ezer, J., Haberman, B., and Verno Anita. 2005. The New Educational Imperative: Improving High School Computer Science Education. Using worldwide research and professional experience to improve U. S. Schools. Final Report of the CSTA Curriculum Improvement Task Force. ACM, CSTA, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Syslo, M. M. and Kwiatkowska, A. B. 2008. The Challenging Face of Informatics Education in Poland. In Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking, Third International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspectives, ISSEP 2008, Torun, Poland, July 1--4, 2008. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Tucker, A. 2010. K-12 Computer Science: Aspirations, Realities, and Challenges. Teaching Fundamentals Concepts of Informatics, 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Tucker, A., Ed. 2003. A . Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee October 2003, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Tucker, A., Seehorn, D., Carey, S., Moix, D., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., O'Grady-Cuniff, D., Stephenson, C., and Verno, A. 2011. CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Revised 2011. CSTA Standards Task Force. file:///C|/Users/Hubwieser/AppData/Roaming/Mozilla/Firefox/Profiles/eass6k5e.default/zotero/storage/P96QBAVK/CSTAStandardsReview2011.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Uljens, M. 1997. School didactics and learning. A school didactic model framing an analysis of pedagogical implications of learning theory. Psychology Press, Hove.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. van Weert, T. J. and Anderson, J. 2002. Information and Communication Technology in Education. A Curriculum for Schools and Programme of Teacher Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. van Weert, T. J. and Tinsley J. D. 1994. Informatics for secondary education. A curriculum for schools. UNESCO, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. van Weert, T. J., Ed. 2000. Information and Communication Technology in Secondary Education. A Curriculum for Schools, Genf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Weeger, M. 2007. Synopse zum Informatikunterricht in Deutschland. Analyse der informatischen Bildung der allgemein bildenden Schulen -- durchgeführt auf der Basis existierender Lehrpläne und Richtlinien. Bakkalaureatsarbeit. Accessed 2 February 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Weinert, F. E. 2001. Concept of Competence: A conceptual clarification. In Defining and Selecting Key Competencies, D. Rychen and L. Salganik, Eds. Hogrefe and Huber, Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, C., Sudol, L. A., Stephenson, C., and Stehlik, M. 2010. Running on Empty. http://csta.acm.org/runningonempty/fullreport.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer science/informatics in secondary education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE-WGR '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education - working group reports
      June 2011
      58 pages
      ISBN:9781450311229
      DOI:10.1145/2078856

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader