The influence of avatar (self and character) animations on distance estimation, object interaction and locomotion in immersive virtual environments

ABSTRACT

Humans have been shown to perceive and perform actions differently in immersive virtual environments (VEs) as compared to the real world. Immersive VEs often lack the presence of virtual characters; users are rarely presented with a representation of their own body and have little to no experience with other human avatars/characters. However, virtual characters and avatars are more often being used in immersive VEs. In a two-phase experiment, we investigated the impact of seeing an animated character or a self-avatar in a head-mounted display VE on task performance. In particular, we examined performance on three different behavioral tasks in the VE. In a learning phase, participants either saw a character animation or an animation of a cone. In the task performance phase, we varied whether participants saw a co-located animated self-avatar. Participants performed a distance estimation, an object interaction and a stepping stone locomotion task within the VE. We find no impact of a character animation or a self-avatar on distance estimates. We find that both the animation and the self-avatar influenced task performance which involved interaction with elements in the environment; the object interaction and the stepping stone tasks. Overall the participants performed the tasks faster and more accurately when they either had a self-avatar or saw a character animation. The results suggest that including character animations or self-avatars before or during task execution is beneficial to performance on some common interaction tasks within the VE. Finally, we see that in all cases (even without seeing a character or self-avatar animation) participants learned to perform the tasks more quickly and/or more accurately over time.

References

1. Bard, C., Hay, L., and Fleury, M. 1985. Role of peripheral vision in the directional control of rapid aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Psychology 39, 151--161.
2. Bodenheimer, B., Meng, J., Wu, H., Narasimham, G., Rump, B., McNamara, T. P., Carr, T. H., and Rieser, J. J. 2007. Distance estimation in virtual and real environments using bisection. ACM Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 35--40.
3. Di Luca, M. 2010. New method to measure end-to-end delay of virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 6, 569--584.
4. Dodds, T., Mohler, B., and Blthoff, H. 2010. A communication task in hmd virtual environments: Speaker and listener movement improves communication. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (CASA 2010 (6), 1--4.
5. Durlach, N., and Slater, M. 2000. Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. PRESENCE 9, 1, 214--217.
6. Henry, D., and Furness, T. 1993. Spatial perception in virtual environments: Evaluating an architectural application. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 33--40.
7. Lok, B. C. 2004. Toward the merging of real and virtual spaces. Communications of the ACM 47, 8 (August), 21--46.
8. Loomis, J., and Knapp, J. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distances in real and virtual environments l. j. hettinger and m. w. haas, eds. erlbaum, mahwah, nj, ch. 2. Virtual and Adaptive Environments, 21--46.
9. Mohler, B. J., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2006. The influence of feedback on egocenteric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. In Proc. Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, ACM, 9--14.
10. Mohler, B., Campos, J., Weyel, M., and Blthoff., H. H. 2007. Gait parameters while walking in a head-mounted display virtual environment and the real world. Proceedings of the 13th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments and 10th Immersive Projection Technology Workshop (IPT-EGVE 2007) (07), 85--88.
11. Mohler, B. J., Blthoff, H., Thompson, W., and Creem-Regehr, S. 2008. A full-body avatar improves egocentric distance judgments in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV 08) (August), 194--197.
12. Mohler, B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W., and Blthoff, H. H. 2010. The impact of an animated avatar on egocentric distance perception in an immersive virtual environment. European Conference on Visual Perception 39 ECVP Abstract Supplement (August), 51.
13. Mohler, B. J., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B., and Blthoff, H. H. 2010. The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an hmd-based virtual environment. PRESENCE (June).
14. Philbeck, J. W., Woods, A. J., Arthur, J., and Todd, J. 2008. Progressive locomotor recalibration during blind walking. Percept Psychophys 70, 8 (Nov), 14591470.
15. Prinz, W. 1997. Perception and action planning. European journal of cognitive psychology.
16. Proteau, L., Boivin, K., Linossier, S., and Abahnini, K. 2000. Exploring the limits of peripheral vision for the control of movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 32, 277--286.
17. Reichenbach, A., Thielscher, A., Peer, A., Bülthoff, H., and Bresciani, J.-P. 2009. Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position. The Journal of Physiology 587, 19, 4605--4616.
18. Richardson, A. R., and Waller, D. 2007. Interaction within immersive virtual environment corrects users distance estimates. Human Factors 49, 3, 507--517.
19. Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., and Anderson, L. 2008. The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 167--170.
20. Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., and Phillips, L. 2009. Analyzing the effect of a virtual avatar's geometric and motion fidelity on ego-centric spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. In 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '09), ACM, New York, NY, USA, S. N. S. (Ed.), Ed., ACM, 59--66.
21. Saunders, J., and Knill, D. 2004. Visual feedback control of hand movements. Journal of Neuroscience.
22. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., and Knoblich. 2006. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
23. Slater, M., and Usoh, M. 1994. Body centered interaction in immersive virtual environments. In N. M. Thalmann & D. Thalmann (Eds.), Artificial life and virtual reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons., 125148.
24. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M., and Blanke, O. 2006. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 5, 5: e10564.
25. Slater, M. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364, 1535 (Dec), 3549--3557.
26. Spijkers, W., and Spellerberg, S. 1995. On-line control of rapid aiming movements? Acta Psychologica 90, 333--348.
27. Streuber, S., and de la Rosa, S. 2010. The role of body and tool-based information in joint action coordination. European Conference on Visual Percpetion Conference Abstract.
28. Streuber, S., de la Rosa, S., Trutoiu, L.-C. C., Blthoff, H. H., and Mohler, B. 2009. Does brief exposure to a self-avatar affect common human behaviors in immersive virtual environments? Eurographics 2009: The 30th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Graphics, 1--4. (Eds.) Stamminger, M., P. Dutr, Oxford, UK, Blackwell.
29. Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Tele-operators and Virtual Environments 13, 5, 560--571.
30. Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Westerman, C., Rieser, J., and Bodenheimer, B. 2006. Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

      • Virtual reality

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Mixed / augmented reality

      • Virtual reality