skip to main content
10.1145/2071536.2071585acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expressive interactions: tablet usability for young mobile learners

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we examine the usability of tablets for students in middle school in the context of mobile environmental education. Our study focuses on the expressive qualities of three input methods -- text, audio and drawing -- and the extent to which these methods support on-task behaviour. In our study 28 small groups of children were given iPads and asked to record ecological observations from around their schoolyard. The effectiveness of the devices and their core utility for expressive, on-task data capture is assessed.

References

  1. Ackerman, E. Perspective taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai and M. Resnick (Eds.) Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking and Learning in a Digital World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996, 25--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, Y. S, Kao, T. C. and Sheu, J. P. A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, (2003), 347--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gay, G., Reiger, R., and Bennington, T. Using mobile computing to enhance field study. In N. Miyake, R. Hall, and T. Koschmann (Eds.) CSCL2: Carrying the conversation forward, Erlbaum, 2002, 507--528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Henning, P. H. Everyday Cognition and Situated Learning. In H. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2004, 143--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Read, J., and MacFarlane, S. Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions on child computer interaction. In Proc of IDC 2006, ACM Press (2006), 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sharples, M., Taylor, J. and Vavoula, G. A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research, Sage, London, 2007, 221--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith, H., Luckin, R., Fitzpatrick, G., Avramides, K., and Underwood, J. Technology at work to mediate collaborative scientific enquiry in the field. In Proc of AIED 2005, IOS Press (2005), 603--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wyeth, P. and MacColl, I. Noising Around: Investigations in Mobile Learning. In Proc of IDC 2010, ACM Press (2010), 147--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Expressive interactions: tablet usability for young mobile learners

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '11: Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
      November 2011
      363 pages
      ISBN:9781450310901
      DOI:10.1145/2071536

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader