skip to main content
10.1145/2069618.2069693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Interpretation as driver for psychological creativity

Published:03 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes some acts of psychological creativity as phenomena arising from changes to a situation, brought about through interpretation. It presents a way of representing a situation as a schema of concepts made up from perceptual dimensions. It shows the utility of concepts as being changed by the situation within which they are used. An example of this is described, in which the information within a concept is unchanged yet its use becomes different through salience weighting. A computational implemented example is presented as a generate-and-interpret model that produces country growth indicators and then interprets them and repeats this process. The situation, and the space of possible designs, is changed through the act of interpretation. It is suggested that interpretation can be a driver for changing situations -- something that looks like P-creativity to an outside observer.

References

  1. Barsalou, L.W. Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe and D. Rakison (eds), Building Object Categories. Carnegie Symposium Series, Erlbaum, NJ (2005), 389--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boden, M.A. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gärdenfors, P. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gero, J.S. Situated design computing: Principles, in B.H.V. Topping (ed). Civil Engineering Computations: Tools and Techniques. Stirlingshire (2006), 25--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nosofsky, R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 15 (1986), 39--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, NY, (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith, G. and Gero, J.S. What does an agent mean by being "situated"? Design Studies 26 (2005), 535--.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Suwa, M., Gero, J.S. and Purcell, T. Unexpected discoveries and S-inventions of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21(6) (2000), 539--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Interpretation as driver for psychological creativity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '11: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition
      November 2011
      492 pages
      ISBN:9781450308205
      DOI:10.1145/2069618
      • General Chair:
      • Ashok K. Goel,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Fox Harrell,
      • Brian Magerko,
      • Yukari Nagai,
      • Jane Prophet

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 November 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader