skip to main content
10.1145/2069087.2069096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparative analysis of the user behavior in academic WiFi networks

Published:31 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless local area networks (WLAN) are common in universities and their popularity grows every day. Understanding the trends in the use of these networks (i.e. how much, when and where traffic is present) is becoming more relevant. Interesting results can be extracted by analyzing WLAN traces from real scenarios. In this work, three buildings are studied on two campuses in Barcelona (Spain) and its surroundings. This is the first study providing the user behavior in a European campus. Similar trends are observed in the three buildings, despite the different amount of users, purpose of the building and size of the campus. Daily and weekly patterns are shown. The population accessing the networks is mostly composed of infrequent users: less than half of the devices access the WLAN more than four days during the three months studied. Many users visiting one building associate with only one access point: despite the widespread use of lightweight devices many users are static. The main difference among different buildings is the fidelity of users: users on a small campus are more likely to reappear on different days than on a large campus, where the population is more heterogeneous. The results of this analysis provide general tools for characterizing campus-wide WLAN and a better understanding of usage and performance issues in a mature wireless network in Europe.

References

  1. Hills, A. 1999. Wireless Andrew {mobile computing for university campus}. IEEE Spectrum. 36, 6 (June 1999), 49--53. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/6.769269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Wierenga, K., and Florio, L. 2005. Eduroam: past, present and future. In Proceedings of Terena Networking Conference (Poznan, Poland, 2005), 169--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tang, D., and Baker, M. 2000. Analysis of a Local-Area Wireless Network. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 6--11, 2000). MobiCom'00, ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/345910.345912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Schwab, D., and Bunt, R. 2004. Characterising the Use of a Campus Wireless Network. In Prooceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societes (Hong Kong, March 7--11, 2004). Infocom'04. IEEE, 862--870 vol 2. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1356974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutchins, R., and Zegura E. W. 2002. Measurements of a Campus Wireless Network. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (New York City, USA, April 28 -- May 2, 2002). 3161--3167 vol 5. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2002.997419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kotz, D., and Essien, K. 2005. Analysis of a Campus-Wide Wireless Network. Wireless Networks. 11, 1--2 (January 2005), 115--133. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11276-004--4750-0. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McNett, M., and Voelker, G. M. 2005. Access and Mobility of Wireless PDA Users. ACM Sigmobile Mobile Computing and Communications Review. 9, 2 (April 2005), 40--55. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1072989.1072995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Papadopouli, M., Shen, H., and Spanakis, M. 2005. Modeling Client Arrivals at Access Points in Wireless Capus-Wide Networks. In Prooceedings of the 14th IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (Chania, Greece, September 2005). 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson, T., Kotz, D., and Abyzov, I. 2008. The Changing Usage of a Mature Campus-wide Wireless Network. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking. 52, 14 (October 2008), 2690--2712. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2008.05.003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zola, E., Barcelo-Arroyo, F., and Lopez-Ramirez, M. 2009. User Behaviour in a WLAN Campus: a Real Case Study. In Proceedings of the third Ercim Workshop on eMobility (Enschede, The Netherlands, May 27--28, 2009). 67--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zola, E., and Barcelo-Arroyo, F. 2010. WLAN User Behaviour: Opportunities for m-Learning. In Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning (Porto, Portugal, March 19--21, 2010). 361--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Balazinska, M., and Castro, P. 2003. Characterizing Mobility and Network Usage in a Corporate Wireless Local-Area Network. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mobile Systems. Applications and Services (San Francisco, California, USA, May 5--8, 2003). MobiSys'03. ACM, New York, NY. 303--316. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1066116.1066127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Balachandran, A., Voelker, G. M., Bahl, P., and Rangan, P.V. 2002. Characterizing User Behavior and Network Performance in a Public Wireless LAN. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Measurements and Modeling of Computer Systems (Marina del Rey, California, USA, June 15--19, 2002). ACM SIGMETRICS'02. ACM, New York. 195--205. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/511334.511359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blinn, D. P., Henderson, T., and Kotz, D. 2005. Analysis of a Wi-Fi Hotspot Network. Workshop on Wireless Traffic Measurements and Modeling (Seattle, WA, USA, June 6--8, 2005). WiTMeMo'05. USENIX Association Berkeley, CA. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tang, D., and Baker, M. 2002. Analysis of a Metropolitan-Area Wireless Network. Wireless Networks. 8, 2--3 (March-May 2002), 107--120. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013739407600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hsu, W. J., and Helmy, A. 2006. On Modeling User Associations in Wireless LAN Traces on University Campuses. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 3--6, 2006). 1--9. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WIOPT.2006.1666494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Song, U., Deshpande, U., Kozat, U. C., Kotz, D., and Jain, R. 2006. Predictability of WLAN Mobility and its Effects on Bandwidth Provisioning. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Barcelona, Spain, April 2006). INFOCOM 2006. IEEE Society. 1--13. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2006.171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Balajinath, B., and Raghavan, S. V. 2001. Intrusion Detection through Learning Behavior Model. Computer Communications. 24, 12 (July 2001), 1200--1212. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140--3664(00)00364--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Huang, Y. F., and Lin, K. H. 2008. Global Data Allocation Based on User Behaviors in Mobile Computing Environments. Computer Communications. 31, 10 (June 2008), 2420--2427. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2008.03.009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chinchilla, F., Lindsey, M., and Papadopouli, M. 2004. Analysis of Wireless Information Locality and Association Patterns in a Campus. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer Communications Societies (Hong Kong, March 7--11, 2004). INFOCOM 2004. 906--917 vol2. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1356978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Papadopouli, M., Shen, H., and Spanakis, M. 2005. Characterizing the Duration and Association Pattern of Wireless Access in a Campus. In Proceedings of the 11th European Wireless Conference (Nicosia, Cyprus, April 2005). DOI= http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.80.6941&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Thajchayapong, S., and Peha, J. M. 2006. Mobility Patterns in Microcellular Wireless Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Comuputing. 5, 1 (January 2006), 52--63. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2006.13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lonvick, C. 2001. The BSD Syslog Protocol. RFC 3164 (rfc3164). IETF. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A comparative analysis of the user behavior in academic WiFi networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PM2HW2N '11: Proceedings of the 6th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks
        October 2011
        140 pages
        ISBN:9781450309028
        DOI:10.1145/2069087

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate74of226submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader