skip to main content
10.1145/2064747.2064758acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A realism-based analysis of the OpenEHR entry model

Published:28 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a proposal of improvement for clinical models of the OpenEHR standard according to the realism-based assumptions. In order to reach such proposal, we analyze OpenEHR entry model and realism-based ontologies created specifically for Medicine. Thus, we check our approach in a test bed of real medical records. Finally, we suggest a new taxonomy with the aim to improve the entry model, and offer conclusions from our underway research.

References

  1. Almeida, M. B., Souza, R. R. and Fonseca, F. Semantics in the Semantic Web: a critical evaluation. Knowledge Organization Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade, A. Q. and Almeida, M. B., Realist representation of the medical practice: an ontological and epistemological analysis (forthcoming). in Proceedings of the 4th Ontobras, (Gramado, Brazil, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, P. G., Goble, C. A., Bechhofer, S., Paton, N. W., Stevens, R. and Brass, A. An ontology for bioinformatics applications. Bioinformatics, 15 (6). 510--520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Beale, T. and Heard, S. Architecture Overview, OpenEHR Foundation, 2007, 87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beale, T. and Heard, S. An ontology-based model of clinical information. Stud Health Technol Inform, 129 (Pt 1). 760--764.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brochhausen, M., Burgun, A., Ceusters, W., Hasman, A., Leong, T. Y., Musen, M., Oliveira, J. L., Peleg, M., Rector, A. and Schulz, S. Discussion of "biomedical ontologies: toward scientific debate". Methods Inf Med, 50 (3). 217--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceusters, W., Capolupo, M., de Moor, G., Devlies, J. and Smith, B. An Evolutionary Approach to Realism-based Adverse Event Representations. Methods of Information in Medicine, 50 (1). 62--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowell, L. G. and Smith, B. Infectious Disease Ontology in Sintchenko, V. ed. Infectious Disease Informatics, Springer, 2010, 373--395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumontier, M. and Hoehndorf, R. Realism for scientific ontologies Proceeding of the 2010 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010), IOS Press, Toronto, Canada, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Grenon, P., Smith, B. and Goldberg, L. Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain From D. M. Pisanelli (ed.), Ontologies in Medicine, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004, 20--38, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Grenon, P., Smith, B. and Goldberg, L. Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. Stud Health Technol Inform, 102. 20--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. IAO, 2011. Information Artifact Ontology. http://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. MacLeod, M. C., 2005. Universals. http://www.iep.utm.edu/universa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maojo, V., Crespo, J., Garcia-Remesal, M., de la Iglesia, D., Perez-Rey, D. and Kulikowski, C. Biomedical ontologies: toward scientific debate. Methods Inf Med, 50 (3). 203--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Merrill, G. H. Ontological realism: Methodology or misdirection? Applied Ontology, 5. 79--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Merrill, G. H. Realism and reference ontologies: Considerations, reflections and problems. Applied Ontology, 5. 189--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Munn, K. and Smith, B. (eds.). Applied Ontology. An Introduction. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt/Paris/Lancaster/New Brunswick, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. OpenEHR Foundation, 2011. Clinical Knowledge Manager. http://www.openehr.org/knowledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. OpenEHR Foundation, 2007. OpenEHR. http://www.openehr.or.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, P. N. and Mundlos, S. The human phenotype ontology. Clin Genet, 77 (6). 525--534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rosse, C. and Mejino, J. L. V. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36 (6). 478--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rubin, D. L., Shah, N. H. and Noy, N. F. Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9 (1). 75--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ruttenberg, A., From Basic Formal Ontology to the Information Artifact Ontology. in ICBO: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheuermann, R. H., Ceusters, W. and Smith, B., Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis. in 2009 AMIA Summit on Translational Bioinformatics, (San Francisco, CA, 2009), 116--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Schulz, S., Brochhausen, M. and Hoehndorf, R., Higgs bosons, mars missions, and unicorn delusions: How to deal with terms of dubious reference in scientific ontologies (forthcoming). in ICBO 2011, (Buffalo, USA, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Schulz, S. and Karlsson, D., Records and situations. Integrating contextual aspects in clinical ontologies (forthcoming). in Bioontologies 2011, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulz, S., Schober, D., Daniel, C. and Jaulent, M. C. Bridging the semantics gap between terminologies, ontologies, and information models. Stud Health Technol Inform, 160 (Pt 2). 1000--1004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Schulz, S., Stenzhorn, H., Boeker, M. and Smith, B. Strengths and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. RECIIS Rev Electron Comun Inf Inov Saude, 3 (1). 31--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarz, U. and Smith, B. Ontological relations. in Munn, K. and Smith, B. eds. Applied Ontology. An Introduction, Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt/Paris/Lancaster/New Brunswick, 2008, 220--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, B., Beyond concepts: Ontology as reality representation. in FOIS 2004, (Turin, 2004), IOS Press, 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, B. From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39 (3). 288--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L. J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C. J., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S. A., Scheuermann, R. H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P. L., Lewis, S. and Consortium, O. B. I. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25 (11). 1251--1255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Smith, B. and Ceusters, W. Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Applied Ontology, 5. 139--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L. J. and Ohrbach, R. K. Towards an Ontology of Pain and of Pain-Related Phenomena, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A realism-based analysis of the OpenEHR entry model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MIXHS '11: Proceedings of the first international workshop on Managing interoperability and complexity in health systems
        October 2011
        100 pages
        ISBN:9781450309547
        DOI:10.1145/2064747

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Upcoming Conference

      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader