skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063839acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolving social search based on bookmarks and status messages from social networks

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social search is a variant of information retrieval where a document or website is considered relevant if individuals from the searcher's social network have interacted with it. Our ranking metric Social Relevance Score (SRS) is based on two factors. First, the engagement intensity quantifies the effort a user has made during an interaction. Second, users can assign a trust score to each person from their social network, which is then refined using social network analysis. We have tested our hypotheses with our search engine www.social-search.com, which extends the existing social bookmarking platform folkd.com. Our search engine integrates information the folkd.com users share through the popular social networks Twitter and Facebook. With permission of 2,385 testers, we have connected to their social graphs to generate a large-scale real-world dataset. Over the course of a two-month field study, 468,889 individuals have generated 24,854,281 website recommendations. We have used those links to enhance their search results while measuring the impact on the search behavior. We have found that social results are available for most queries and usually lead to more satisfying results.

References

  1. Schenkel, R., Crecelius, T., Kacimi, M., Michel, S., Neumann, T., Parreira, J. X., and Weikum, G. 2008. Efficient top-k querying over social-tagging networks. SIGIR '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Horowitz, D. and Kamvar, S. D. 2010. The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. WWW '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lerman, K. and Ghosh, R. 2010. Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and Twitter social networks. ICWSM '10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yanbe, Y., Jatowt, A., Nakamura, S., and Tanaka, K. 2007. Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? JCDL '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. 1999. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Stanford InfoLab.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans, B. M. and Chi, E. H. 2008. Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search. CSCW '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heymann, P., Koutrika, G., and Garcia-Molina, H. 2008. Can social bookmarking improve web search? WSDM '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., and Su, Z. 2007. Optimizing web search using social annotations. WWW '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rowlands, T., Hawking, D., and Sankaranarayana, R. 2010. New-web search with microblog annotations. WWW '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Clements, M., de Vries, A. P., and Reinders, M. J. T. 2008. Optimizing single term queries using a personalized markov random walk over the social graph. ESAIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gou, L., Chen, H., Kim, J., Zhang, X., and Giles, C. L. 2010. SNDocRank: document ranking based on social networks. WWW '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ma, H., King, I., and Lyu, and M. R. 2009. Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. SIGIR '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hotho, A., Jaschke, R., Schmitz, C., and Stumme, G. 2006. Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. ESWC '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mislove, A., Gummadi, K. P., and Druschel, P. 2006. Exploiting social networks for Internet search. HotNets-V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cleverdon, C., Mills, J., and Keen, M. 1966. Factors Determining the performance of indexing Systems. Aslib Cranfield research project, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D. L., and Spink, A. 2008. Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries. Information Processing and Management, 44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Robertson, S. and Sparck Jones, K. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM '09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Truls A. Bjorklund, Götz M., and Gehrke J. 2010. Search in social networks with access control. KEYS '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evolving social search based on bookmarks and status messages from social networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
          October 2011
          2712 pages
          ISBN:9781450307178
          DOI:10.1145/2063576

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 October 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader