skip to main content
research-article

Spatial grounding with vague place models

Published:01 July 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Vagueness arises as a problem in the context of grounding named entities, a central task in geographic information retrieval (GIR) which consists in establishing the entities' "denotation with respect to the world or a model" [8]. We use the term spatial grounding in a slightly more general sense to refer to the association of any type of spatial descriptor with a place model. In the simplest case, the descriptor consists of a toponym and the place model is provided by a (vague) geographic region. More complex descriptors make use of prepositional phrases or even a text span comprising many sentences, e.g. a travel blog entry. However, descriptors are in no way limited to natural language expressions. A frequently used descriptor in mobile GIR is the geographic position of the user as part of the specification of an information need. Furthermore, spatial activities such as taking photographs can also act as descriptors for places models ("tell me more about the focused object"). Different place models for representing the vagueness of regions have been proposed including supervaluation semantics and qualitatively augmented fuzzy footprints [12]. In this paper we concentrate on approaches to grounding that exploit diverse information sources, for instance, topographic data or the spatial behavior of a user community, to determine place models which are sometimes more complex than point sets.

References

  1. Frank, A. (2009): Why is scale an effective descriptor for data quality? The physical and ontological rationale for imprecision and level of detail. In: G. Navratil (ed.): Research Trends in Geographic Information Science. Berlin: Springer, p. 39--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gravano, L.; Hatzivassiloglou, V.; Lichtenstein, R. (2003): Categorizing web queries according to geographical locality. In: D. Kraft (ed.): CIKM-03 Proceedings of the 12th Int. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Girardin, F.; Blatt, J.; Calabrese, F.; Dal Fiore, F.; Ratti, C. (2008): Digital footprinting: Uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7 (4), p. 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Girardin, F.; Vaccari, A.; Gerber, A.; Biderman, A.; Ratti, C. (2009): Quantifying urban attractiveness from the distribution and density of digital footprints. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructure Research 4, p. 175--200Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Helleland, B. (2006): The social and cultural values of geographic names. In: Manual for the National Standardization of Geographical Names. New York: United Nations Publication, S. 121--128. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_88e.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Henrich, A.; Lüdecke, V. (2007): Characteristics of geographic information needs. In: R. Purves et al. (eds.): GIR-07 Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop On Geographic Information Retrieval, ACM Press, p. 1--6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Henrich, A.; Lüdecke, V. (2009): Measuring similarity of geographic regions for geographic information retrieval. In: Boughanem, M. et al. (eds.): ECIR-09 Proceedings 31th European Conference on IR Research, Berlin: Springer (LNCS 5478), p. 781--785 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Leidner, J.; Sinclair, G.; Webber, B. (2003): Grounding spatial named entities for information extraction and question answering. In: A. et al Kornai (eds.): GEOREF '03 Proceedings Workshop on Analysis of Geographic References, ACL, p. 31--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jones, C.; Purves, R.; Clough, P.; Joho, H. (2008): Modelling vague places with knowledge from the Web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22 (10), p. 1045--1065. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Montello, Daniel; Goodchild, Michael; Gottsegen, Jonathon; Fohl, Peter (2003): Where's downtown? Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition and Computation 3 (2&3), S. 185--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Schlieder C., Matyas C. (2009). Photographing a city: An analysis of place concepts based on spatial choices. Spatial Cognition and Computation 9 (3), p. 212--228Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Schockaert, S. (2011). Vague regions in geographic information retrieval, SIGSPATIAL special issue on Geographic Information Retrieval, this issue Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Smith, B.; Varzi, A. (2000): Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2), p. 401--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Straumann, R; Purves, R. (2008): Delineation of valleys and valley floors. In: T. Cova et al. (eds.): GIScience-08 Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conference on Geographic Information Science. Berlin: Springer (LNCS, 5266), p. 320--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Vögele, Thomas (2004): Spatial Information Retrieval with Place Names. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bremen. elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/publications/dissertations/E-Diss978_voegele.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spatial grounding with vague place models

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image SIGSPATIAL Special
          SIGSPATIAL Special  Volume 3, Issue 2
          July 2011
          76 pages
          EISSN:1946-7729
          DOI:10.1145/2047296
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2011 Authors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 July 2011

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader