skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037414acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Augmented reality vs. street views: a driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prior research has shown that when drivers look away from the road to view a personal navigation device (PND), driving performance is affected. To keep visual attention on the road, an augmented reality (AR) PND using a heads-up display could overlay a navigation route. In this paper, we compare the AR PND, a technology that does not currently exist but can be simulated, with two PND technologies that are popular today: an egocentric street view PND and the standard map-based PND. Using a high-fidelity driving simulator, we examine the effect of all three PNDs on driving performance in a city traffic environment where constant, alert attention is required. Based on both objective and subjective measures, experimental results show that the AR PND exhibits the least negative impact on driving. We discuss the implications of these findings on PND design as well as methods for potential improvement.

References

  1. Burnett, G. E. A Road-Based Evaluation of a Head-Up Display for Presenting Navigation Information. In Proc. HCI Int'l Conference (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fröhlich, P., Schatz, R., Leitner, P., Mantler, S., and Baldauf, M. Evaluating realistic visualizations for safety-related in-car information systems. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM press (2010), 3847--3852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Google Maps Navigation. http://www.google.com/mobile/navigation/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google Street View. http://maps.google.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload. P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. North Holland Press (1988), 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., and Alexander, A. L. The Effects of Head-Up Display Clutter and In-Vehicle Display Separation on Concurrent Driving Performance. In Proc. HFES 47th Annual Meeting (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., and Consalus, K. P. Modeling Drivers' Visual Attention Allocation while Interacting with In-Vehicle Technologies. Experimental Psychology: Applied 12, (2006), 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kim, S. and Dey, A. K. Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kun, A. L., Paek, T., Medenica, Ž., Memarović, N., and Palinko, O. Glancing at personal navigation devices can affect driving: experimental results and design implications. In Proc. AutomotiveUI '09, ACM Press (2009), 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lai, J., Cheng, K., Green, P., and Tsimhoni, O. On the Road and on the Web? Comprehension of synthetic and human speech while driving. In Proc. SIGCHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 206--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Liu, Y. C. Effects of using head-up display in automobile context on attention demand and driving performance. Displays 24, 4--5 (2003), 157--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lowe, S. Many Workers Have Long Commutes to Work. US Census Bureau Press Release. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/american_community_survey_acs/004279.html. March 29, 2005. Retrieved 5/30/2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. NASA TLX for Windows. http://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/computer.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Narzt, W., Kolb, D., Muller, R., and Hortner, H. Pervasive Information Acquisition for Mobile AR-Navigation Systems. In Proc. WMCSA 2003, IEEE Press (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Porathe, T. and Prison, J. 2008. Design of human-map system interaction. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Steinfeld, A. and Green, P. Driver Responses to Navigation Information on Full-Windshield, Head-Up Displays. Int'l Journal of Vehicle Design 19, 2 (1998), 135--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Strayer, D. L. and Johnston, W. A. Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone. Psychological Science 12, 6 (2001), 462--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tönnis, M. and Klinker, G. 2006. Effective control of a car driver's attention for visual and acoustic guidance towards the direction of imminent dangers. In Proc. ISMAR 2006, IEEE Computer Society (2006), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Veit, R. R., Pyle, P., and McGowan, J. A. Ocean Warming and Long-Term Change in Pelagic Bird Abundance within the California Current System. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 139 (1996), 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Virtual Cable#8482;. http://www.mvs.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wikitude Drive. http://www.wikitude.org/en/drive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Augmented reality vs. street views: a driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2011
      781 pages
      ISBN:9781450305419
      DOI:10.1145/2037373

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader