skip to main content
research-article

Player experience and technical performance prospects for distributed 3D gaming in private and public settings

Published:14 November 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Distributed gaming enables access to interactive media from devices based on different platforms. It facilitates users to enjoy video games in various environments without the need for using a single device or operating system. Understanding the potential and limitations of such gaming-on-demand systems is key for their adoption and further growth in public places. This paper presents an in-depth, quantitative study performed with the Games@Large (GaL) distributed-gaming system and its potential users at an Internet café in Genoa, Italy. The approach of the study was multilevel, covering the player experience and user acceptance aspects as well as technical performance peculiarities. Results show that the GaL system has a high potential at Internet cafes, in particular when playing a casual genre game. Furthermore, results provide recommendations for deploying such systems in terms of social setting and technical aspects. The methodology and findings of the GaL system tests can be applied to similar game streaming systems and used as input for theories on social digital game play.

References

  1. Beigbeder, T., Coughlan, R., Lusher, C., Plunkett, J., Agu, E., and Claypool, M. 2004. The effects of loss and latency on user performance in unreal tournament 2003. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames'04). ACM, New York, NY, 144--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Claypool, K. and Claypool, M. 2007. On frame rate and player performance in first person shooter games. Multimedia Syst. 13, 1, 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. de Kort, Y. A. W. and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2008. People, places and play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context. ACM Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., and Poels, K. 2007. Digital games as social presence technology: Development of the social presence in gaming questionnaire (SPGQ). In Proceedings of the Presence Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dick, M., Wellnitz, O., and Wolf, L. 2005. Analysis of factors affecting players' performance and perception in multiplayer games. In Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames'05). ACM, New York, NY, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Freeman, J., Lessiter, J., Smith, S., and Carmichael, R. 2007. Focus area requirements document. Deliverable D2.1. European Integrated Project Games@Large.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. fuga. 2011. FUGA—The fun of gaming: Measuring the human experience of media enjoyment. http://fuga.aalto.fi/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2008a. Shared fun is doubled fun: player enjoyment as a function of social setting. In Fun and Games, P. Markopoulos, B. de Ruyter, W. IJsselsteijn and D. Rowland, Eds., Springer, New York, 106--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2008b. Influence of social setting on player experience of digital games. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2009a. Rules of engagement: Influence of social setting on player enjoyment in digital games. Int. J. Gam. Comput.-Mediat. Simul. 1, 14--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2009b. See no rival, hear no rival: The role of social cues in digital game settings. In Proceedings of CHI Nederland. 25--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., and Poels, K. 2009c. Where everybody knows your game: The appeal and function of game cafés in Western Europe. In Proceedings of ACE. 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gajadhar, B. J., Kort, Y. A. W. d., IJsselsteijn, W. A., and Poels, K. 2009. Where everybody knows your game: The appeal and function of game cafés in Western Europe. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE'09). ACM, 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. hric. 2005. Logging on in China's internet cafes: An HRIC field survey. China Rights Forum, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W., and Poels, K. 2008. The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y. A. W., and Poels, K. 2008a. Game Experience Questionnaire (GEQ), In-game version.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansz, J. and Martens, L. 2005. Gaming at a LAN event: The social context of playing video games. New Media Soc. 7, 333--355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jonsson, F. 2010. A public place of their own. A field study of a game café as a third place. In Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic (Experiencing Games: Games, Play, and Players.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jurgelionis, A., Bellotti, F., De Gloria, A., Eisert, P., Laulajainen, J.-P., and Shani, A. 2009a. Distributed video game streaming system for pervasive gaming. STreaming Day'09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jurgelionis, A., Bellotti, F., De Gloria, A., Laulajainen, J.-P., Fechteler, P., Eisert, P., and David, H. 2010. Testing cross-platform streaming of video games over wired and wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA). 1053--1058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jurgelionis, A., Fechteler, P., Eisert, P., Bellotti, F., David, H., Laulajainen, J. P., Carmichael, R., Poulopoulos, V., Laikari, A., Perälä, P., De Gloria, A., and Bouras, C. 2009. Platform for distributed 3D gaming. Int. J. Computer Games Technol. Article ID 231863. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kemerlis, V. P., Stefanis, E. C., Xylomenos, G., and Polyzos, G. C. 2006. Throughput unfairness in TCP over WiFi. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Wireless On-Demand Networked Systems and Services (WONS'06). 26--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolko, B. E. and Putnam, C. 2009. Computer games in the developing world: The value of non-instrumental engagement with ICTs, or taking play seriously. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD'09). IEEE Press, 46--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Korobkin, Y., David, H., Nap, H. H., Gajadhar, B. J., Oosting, W., de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., and Laulajainen, J.-P. 2009. Alpha model evaluation report, Deliverable D5B. European Integrated Project Games@Large.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Martins, M., Nap, H. H., Gajadhar, B. J., Oosting, W., Jurgelionis, A., Carmichael, R., Silva, L., Milagaia, F., Bellotti, F., De Gloria, A., Freeman, J., and David, H. 2010. The future of distributed gaming: Technical advantages and user-centred design. PRISMA Mag. (Special Edition), Prisma.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Middleton, C. A. 2003. Broadband internet usage outside the home: Insights from a study of toronto internet cafes. In Ted Rogers School of Information Technology Management Publications and Research, paper 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. MPEG-4 HE-AAC. 2005. Information technology, coding of audio-visual objects, Part 3: Audio. ISO/IEC 14496-3:2005/Amd.2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nave, I., David, H., Shani, A., Laikari, A., Eisert, P., and Fechteler, P. 2008. GaL graphics streaming architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Clectronics (ISCE'08).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. PAESSLER. 2011. PRTG network monitor. http://www.paessler.com/prtg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Paessler PRTG7. 2011. PRTG Network Monitor 7—User Manual, Calculating Percentiles. http://www. paessler.com/manuals/prtg7/calculating_percentiles.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rangaswamy, N. 2007. ICT for development and commerce: A case study of internet cafés in India, {Research in progress paper}. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Salvador, T., Sherry, J. W., and Urrutia, A. E. 2005. Less cyber, more café: Enhancing existing small businesses across the digital divide with ICTs. Inform. Technol. Develop. 11, 77--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Svoboda, P. and Rupp, M. 2005. Online gaming models for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IASTED European Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (IMSA). 417--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tzruya, Y., Shani, A., Bellotti, F., and Jurgelionis, A. 2006. GaL—a new platform for ubiquitous gaming and multimedia. In Proceeding of the Broadband Europe Conference (BBEurope).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. wireshark. 2011. Wireshark network protocol analyzer. http://www.wireshark.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Player experience and technical performance prospects for distributed 3D gaming in private and public settings

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader