Abstract
Banner blindness, the phenomenon of website users actively ignoring web banners, was first reported in the late 1990s. This study expands the banner blindness concept to text advertising blindness and examines the effects of search type and advertisement location on the degree of blindness. Performance and eye-tracking analyses show that users tend to miss information in text ads on the right side of the page more often than in text ads at the top of the page. Search type (exact or semantic) was also found to affect performance and eye-tracking measures. Participant search strategies differed depending on search type and whether the top area of the page was perceived to be advertising or relevant content. These results show that text ad blindness occurs, significantly affects search performance on web pages, and is more prevalent on the right side of the page than the top.
- AdWords (2011). Advertise your business on Google. Retrieved April 11, 2011 from Google Adwords (https://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=6084)Google Scholar
- AdSense (2011). Google Adsense Ad Formats. Retrieved April 11, 2011 from Google Adsense (https://www.google.com/adsense/static/en/AdFormats.html)Google Scholar
- Albert, W. (2002). Do web users actually look at ads? A case study of banner ads and eye-tracking technology. In Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association 2002 Conference. Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
- Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (2007). ACCC alleges misleading and deceptive conduct by Trading Post and Google. Retrieved April 11, 2011 from Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/792088/fromItemId/142)Google Scholar
- Benway, J. P. (1998). Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the world wide web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 463-467). Chicago, Illinois: HFES.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.). Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189-94). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Burke, M., Hornof, A., Nilsen, E., & Gorman, N. (2005). High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(4), 423-445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buscher, G., Dumais, S., & Cutrell, E. (2010). The good, the bad, and the random: An eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search. In SIGIR 2010 (pp. 42-49). Geneva, Switzerland: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooke, L. (2008). How do users search web home pages? An eye-tracking study of multiple navigation menus. Technical Communication, 55(2), 176-194.Google Scholar
- Fox, D., Smith, A., & Chaparro, B. S. (2009). Optimizing presentation of Adsense ads within blogs. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53nd Annual Meeting (pp. 463-467). San Antonio, Texas: HFES.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granka, L., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2006). Location location location: Viewing patterns on WWW pages. In Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye-tracking research & applications (p. 43). San Diego, California: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grier, R., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. T. (2005). How users view web pages: An exploration of cognitive and perceptual mechanisms. HCI Research in Web Design and Evaluation, 22-41.Google Scholar
- Interactive Advertising Bureau (2010). IAB 2009 internet advertising revenue report {White Paper}.Google Scholar
- Mosconi, M., Porta, M., & Ravarelli, A. (2008). On-line newspapers and multimedia content: An eye-tracking study. In SIGDOC 2008 (pp. 55-64). Lisbon, Portugal: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. (2003, April 28). Will pain-text ads continue to rule? Retrieved April 11, 2011 from Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030428.html)Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (2007, August 20). Banner blindness: Old and new findings. Retrieved April 11, 2011 from Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/banner-blindness.html)Google Scholar
- Pagendarm, M., & Schaumburg, H. (2001). Why are users banner-blind. The impact of navigation styles on the perception of web banners. Journal of Digital Information, 2(1).Google Scholar
- Prasada, Mahajan, & Bronnenberg (2003). Advertising versus pay-per-view in electronic media. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 13-30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2002). Eye-catcher or blind spot? The effect of photographs of faces on e-commerce sites. In Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP Conference on e-commerce, e-business, e-government (i3e) (pp. 383-398), Lisbon, Portugal. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shrestha, S., Owens, J. W., & Chaparro, B. S. (2009). The effect of location and congruency of text ads on information search. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53nd Annual Meeting (pp. 463-467). San Antonio, Texas: HFES.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419-433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yesilada, Y., Jay, C., Stevens, R., & Harper, S. (2008). Validating the use and role of visual elements of web pages in navigation with an eye-tracking study. In WWW 2008, (pp. 11-19). Beijing, China: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36, 2177-2187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zelinksy, G. J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 244-262.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Text Advertising Blindness: The New Banner Blindness?
Recommendations
High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten
The seeming contradiction between “banner blindness” and Web users' complaints about distracting advertisements motivates a pair of experiments into the effect of banner ads on visual search. Experiment 1 measures perceived cognitive workload and search ...
The pervasiveness of text advertising blindness
Users of websites tend to ignore text advertisements, especially when they are on the right side of a web page, even when the advertisements are useful for completing a task. This study explores the impact of web page layout conventions on text ...
Modeling the effect of habituation on banner blindness as a function of repetition and search type: gap analysis for future work
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper provides a theoretical foundation to guide future work in online marketing research. Specifically, we target the phenomenon of banner blindness that prevents users from noticing online advertisements; thus, leading to a steady decline in ...
Comments