skip to main content
10.1145/2002259.2002276acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdebsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rapid detection of rare geospatial events: earthquake warning applications

Published:11 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper presents theory, algorithms, measurements of experiments, and simulations for detecting rare geospatial events by analyzing streams of data from large numbers of heterogeneous sensors. The class of applications are rare events - such as events that occur at most once a month - and that have very high costs for tardy detection and for false positives. The theory is applied to an application that warns about the onset of shaking from earthquakes based on real-time data gathered from different types of sensors with varying sensitivities located at different points in a region. We present algorithms for detecting events in Cloud computing servers by exploiting the scalability of Cloud computers while working within the limits of state synchronization across different servers in the Cloud. Ordinary citizens manage sensors in the form of mobile phones and tablets as well as special-purpose stationary sensors; thus the geospatial distribution of sensors depends on population densities. The distribution of the locations of events may, however, be different from population distributions. We analyze the impact of population distributions (and hence sensor distributions as well) on the efficacy of event detection. Data from sensor measurements and from simulations of earthquakes validate the theory.

References

  1. K. M. Chandy, O. Etzion, and R. von Ammon, "10201 Executive Summary and Manifesto -- Event Processing," in Event Processing, ser. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, no. 10201. Dagstuhl, Germany: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany, 2011. {Online}. Available: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2985Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Campbell, S. Eisenman, N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, R. Peterson, H. Lu, X. Zheng, M. Musolesi, K. Fodor, and G.-S. Ahn, "The rise of people-centric sensing," Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 12--21, 7--8 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Cochran and J. Lawrence, "The quake-catcher network: Citizen science expanding seismic horizons," Seismological Research Letters, vol. 80, p. 26, Jan 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. (2011, 3) Measuring shaking intensity with mobile phones. {Online}. Available: http://ishakeberkeley.appspot.com/mission\BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Schneidert, H. Andrade, B. Gedik, K.-L. Wu, and D. S. Nikolopoulos, "Evaluation of streaming aggregation on parallel hardware architectures," in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, ser. DEBS '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. (2011, 3) Google app engine. {Online}. Available: http://code.google.com/appengine/BIBentrySTDinterwordspacingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Olson and K. M. Chandy, "Performance issues in cloud computing for cyber-physical applications," in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. S. Roman Nurik. (2011, 3) Geospatial queries with google app engine using geomodel. {Online}. Available: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/articles/geospatial.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. geohash.org. (2011, 3) Geohash. {Online}. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeohashGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DMATM 8358.2 The Universal Grids: Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) and Universal Polar Stereographic (UPS), Defense Mapping Agency, Fairfax, VA, 9 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. DMATM 8358.1 Datums, Ellipsoids, Grids, and Grid Reference Systems, Defense Mapping Agency, Fairfax, VA, 9 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Locating a position using utm coordinates. {Online}. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Transverse_MercatorGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Nault, "Nga introduces global area reference system," PathFinder, 11 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. (2011, 3) Georef. {Online}. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeorefGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. G. P. Inc. (2011, 3) The natural area coding system. {Online}. Available: http://www.nacgeo.com/nacsite/documents/nac.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Faulkner, M. Olson, R. Chandy, J. Krause, K. M. Chandy, and A. Krause, "The Next Big One: Detecting Earthquakes and Other Rare Events from Community-based Sensors," in Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. (2011, 3) Netquakes. {Online}. Available: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/monitoring/netquakes/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Herring, A. Hofleitner, S. Amin, T. Nasr, A. Khalek, P. Abbeel, and A. Bayen, "Using mobile phones to forecast arterial traffic through statistical learning," Submitted to Transportation Research Board, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Krause, E. Horvitz, A. Kansal, and F. Zhao, "Toward community sensing," in Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks. IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 481--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Mun, S. Reddy, K. Shilton, N. Yau, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, E. Howard, R. West, and P. Boda, "Peir, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research," in Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 2009, pp. 55--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Völgyesi, A. Nádas, X. Koutsoukos, and Á. Lédeczi, "Air quality monitoring with sensormap," in Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks. IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 529--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Tsitsiklis, "Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors," Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems (MCSS), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 167--182, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Chamberland and V. Veeravalli, "Decentralized detection in sensor networks," Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 407--416, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. F. Martincic and L. Schwiebert, "Distributed event detection in sensor networks," in Systems and Networks Communications, 2006. ICSNC'06. International Conference on. IEEE, 2006, p. 43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. K. Yamanishi, J. Takeuchi, G. Williams, and P. Milne, "On-line unsupervised outlier detection using finite mixtures with discounting learning algorithms," Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275--300, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Davy, F. Desobry, A. Gretton, and C. Doncarli, "An online support vector machine for abnormal events detection," Signal processing, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 2009--2025, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. S. Subramaniam, T. Palpanas, D. Papadopoulos, V. Kalogeraki, and D. Gunopulos, "Online outlier detection in sensor data using non-parametric models," in Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Very large data bases. VLDB Endowment, 2006, pp. 187--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. I. Onat and A. Miri, "An intrusion detection system for wireless sensor networks," in Wireless And Mobile Computing, Networking And Communications, 2005.(WiMob'2005), IEEE International Conference on, vol. 3. IEEE, 2005, pp. 253--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Rapid detection of rare geospatial events: earthquake warning applications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DEBS '11: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international conference on Distributed event-based system
          July 2011
          418 pages
          ISBN:9781450304238
          DOI:10.1145/2002259

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          DEBS '11 Paper Acceptance Rate23of95submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate130of553submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          DEBS '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader