Abstract
Graphing experts often critique the fill patterns which appear in many computer-generated graphs and charts because they can distract from and even distort the information. One of the reasons these fill patterns are so problematic is that they are automatically inserted into any plot a user chooses. In this paper I present both a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of fill patterns and the results of research which compares the ways in which both computer designers and paper-and-pencil designers fill the enclosed areas of their graphs and charts. Results show that automatically placed fill patterns exert strong behavioral influences on computer designers and result in decisions that might be different than if they were using paper and pencil.
- Arnheim, R. (1969) Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, L. (September 1984) Color Considerations: Understanding and Choosing Colors for Computer Graphic Systems. Byte, pp. 227--245.Google Scholar
- Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1990) Postmodernism and the Relation of World and Image in Professional Discourse. The Technical Writing Teacher. 17:3, Fall, pp. 256--271.Google Scholar
- Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1987) Simplicity in Visual Representation: A Semiotic Approach. Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 1:1, January, pp. 9--26.Google Scholar
- Bertin, J. (1983) Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Trans. W.J. Berg. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casali, J. G. and K. B. Gaylin (1988) Selected Graph Design Variables in Four Interpretation Tasks: A Microcomputer-Based Pilot Study. Behavior and Information Technology, 7:1, pp. 31--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cleveland, W. S. (1985) The Elements of Graphing Data. Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Telephone Laboratories. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1983) A Color-Caused Optical Illusion on a Statistical Graph. The American Statistician, 37:1, pp. 101--105.Google Scholar
- Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1985) Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science, 229, pp. 828--833.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cochran, J. K., S. Albrecht and Y. Green (1989) Guidelines for Evaluating Graphical Designs: A Framework Based on Human Perceptual Skills. Technical Communication, First Quarter, pp. 25--32.Google Scholar
- Dondis, D. A. (1973) A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dragga, S. and Gong, G. (1989) Editing: The Design of Rhetoric. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Foster, D. L. (1990) "Top of the Charts." Macworld (July)LEEGoogle Scholar
- Holmes, N. (1991) Designer's Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.Google Scholar
- Jackson, D., B. J. Edwards and C. F. Gerger (1990) Teaching and Learning about Graphing Through Computer-Assisted Problem Solving: Issues in the Design and Interpretation of Graphs, The Design and Use of Educational Software, and Classroom Research Methodology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, April 9, 1990.Google Scholar
- Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Elements of Graph Design. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Laseau, P. (1980) Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
- Monmonier, M. (1993) Mapping It Out: Expository Cartography for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Schenk, P. (1991) The Role of Drawing in the Graphic Design Process. Design Studies (July 3) 1991, 168--181.Google Scholar
- Snell, J. (1994) Letters. Macuser 10:6 (June), p. 18.Google Scholar
- Tannas, Jr., L. E. (1992) Color in Electronic Displays. Physics Today, 45:1, 52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tufte, E. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tufte, E. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ullman, D. G., Stephen Wood, et al. (1990). The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computing and Graphics, 14:2, 263--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wagner, E. (1988) The Computer Display Designer's Handbook. Sweden: Chartwell Bratt. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wheildon, C. (1986) Communicating or Just Making Pretty Shapes: A Study of the Validity -- or Otherwise -- of Some Elements of Typographic Design. North Sydney, N.S.W., Australia: News paper Advertising Bureau of Australia, Ltd.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- How computer graphing programs change the graph design process: results of research on the fill pattern feature
Comments