skip to main content
article
Free Access

How computer graphing programs change the graph design process: results of research on the fill pattern feature

Published:01 November 1994Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Graphing experts often critique the fill patterns which appear in many computer-generated graphs and charts because they can distract from and even distort the information. One of the reasons these fill patterns are so problematic is that they are automatically inserted into any plot a user chooses. In this paper I present both a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of fill patterns and the results of research which compares the ways in which both computer designers and paper-and-pencil designers fill the enclosed areas of their graphs and charts. Results show that automatically placed fill patterns exert strong behavioral influences on computer designers and result in decisions that might be different than if they were using paper and pencil.

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (1969) Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, L. (September 1984) Color Considerations: Understanding and Choosing Colors for Computer Graphic Systems. Byte, pp. 227--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1990) Postmodernism and the Relation of World and Image in Professional Discourse. The Technical Writing Teacher. 17:3, Fall, pp. 256--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1987) Simplicity in Visual Representation: A Semiotic Approach. Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 1:1, January, pp. 9--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertin, J. (1983) Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Trans. W.J. Berg. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Casali, J. G. and K. B. Gaylin (1988) Selected Graph Design Variables in Four Interpretation Tasks: A Microcomputer-Based Pilot Study. Behavior and Information Technology, 7:1, pp. 31--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cleveland, W. S. (1985) The Elements of Graphing Data. Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Telephone Laboratories. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1983) A Color-Caused Optical Illusion on a Statistical Graph. The American Statistician, 37:1, pp. 101--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1985) Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science, 229, pp. 828--833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cochran, J. K., S. Albrecht and Y. Green (1989) Guidelines for Evaluating Graphical Designs: A Framework Based on Human Perceptual Skills. Technical Communication, First Quarter, pp. 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dondis, D. A. (1973) A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dragga, S. and Gong, G. (1989) Editing: The Design of Rhetoric. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, D. L. (1990) "Top of the Charts." Macworld (July)LEEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes, N. (1991) Designer's Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson, D., B. J. Edwards and C. F. Gerger (1990) Teaching and Learning about Graphing Through Computer-Assisted Problem Solving: Issues in the Design and Interpretation of Graphs, The Design and Use of Educational Software, and Classroom Research Methodology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, April 9, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Elements of Graph Design. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Laseau, P. (1980) Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Monmonier, M. (1993) Mapping It Out: Expository Cartography for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schenk, P. (1991) The Role of Drawing in the Graphic Design Process. Design Studies (July 3) 1991, 168--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Snell, J. (1994) Letters. Macuser 10:6 (June), p. 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tannas, Jr., L. E. (1992) Color in Electronic Displays. Physics Today, 45:1, 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tufte, E. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tufte, E. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ullman, D. G., Stephen Wood, et al. (1990). The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computing and Graphics, 14:2, 263--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wagner, E. (1988) The Computer Display Designer's Handbook. Sweden: Chartwell Bratt. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wheildon, C. (1986) Communicating or Just Making Pretty Shapes: A Study of the Validity -- or Otherwise -- of Some Elements of Typographic Design. North Sydney, N.S.W., Australia: News paper Advertising Bureau of Australia, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How computer graphing programs change the graph design process: results of research on the fill pattern feature

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation
          ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation  Volume 18, Issue 4
          Nov. 1994
          42 pages
          ISSN:0731-1001
          DOI:10.1145/192433
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1994 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 1994

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader