skip to main content
10.1145/1985793.1985886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Architecture evaluation without an architecture: experience with the smart grid

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an analysis of some of the challenges facing one portion of the Electrical Smart Grid in the United States - residential Demand Response (DR) systems. The purposes of this paper are twofold: 1) to discover risks to residential DR systems and 2) to illustrate an architecture-based analysis approach to uncovering risks that span a collection of technical and social concerns. The results presented here are specific to residential DR but the approach is general and it could be applied to other systems within the Smart Grid and to other critical infrastructure domains. Our architecture-based analysis is different from most other approaches to analyzing complex systems in that it addresses multiple quality attributes simultaneously (e.g., performance, reliability, security, modifiability, usability, etc.) and it considers the architecture of a complex system from a socio-technical perspective where the actions of the people in the system are as important, from an analysis perspective, as the physical and computational elements of the system. This analysis can be done early in a system's lifetime, before substantial resources have been committed to its construction or procurement, and so it provides extremely cost-effective risk analysis.

References

  1. L. Bass, P. Clements, R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Clements, R. Kazman, M. Klein, Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies, Addison-Wesley, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Robert Earle, Ahmad Faruqui, Toward a New Paradigm for Valuing Demand Response, The Electricity Journal, Volume 19, Issue 4, May 2006, Pages 21--31, ISSN 1040-6190, DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2006.03.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Falessi, G. Cantone, R. Kazman, P. Kruchten, "Decision making Techniques for Software Architecture Design: A Comparative Survey", ACM Computing Surveys, to appear, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Faruqui, Ahmad and Sergici, Sanem, Household Response to Dynamic Pricing of Electricity - A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (February 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, A National Assessment of Demand Response Potential, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Koomey, Jonathan, & Brown, Richard E.(2002). The role of building technologies in reducing and controlling peak electricity demand. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL Paper LBNL-49947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. National Energy Technology Laboratory, "A Systems View of the Modern Grid", http://www.netl.doe.gov/smartgrid/referenceshelf/whitepapers/ASystemsViewoftheModernGrid_Final_v2_0.pdf, Retrieved August 20, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Newsham, Guy R. and Bowker, Brent G., (2010), The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: A review, Energy Policy, 38, issue 7, p. 3289--3296, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Northrop, L., Feiler, P., Gabriel, R., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., Longstaff, T., Kazman, R., Klein, M., Schmidt, D., Sullivan, K., and Wallnau, K. Ultra-Large-Scale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Salmi-Klotz, Jason. FERC Policy on Demand Response and Order 719. Proceedings of Grid Interop 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. U.S. Department of Energy. Smart Grid System Report. July 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. U.S. Department of Energy, Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them - A Report to the United States Congress Pursuant to Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zpryme Research & Consulting, Smart Grid Insights: Smart Appliances. March 2010. http://www.zpryme.com/SmartGridInsights/2010_Smart_Appliance_Report_Zpryme_Smart_Grid_Insights.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Architecture evaluation without an architecture: experience with the smart grid

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE '11: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
          May 2011
          1258 pages
          ISBN:9781450304450
          DOI:10.1145/1985793

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 May 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2025

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader