Abstract
Fueled by their promise to solve the problem of distilling valuable information and business insight from big data in a scalable and programmer-friendly way, noSQL databases have been one of the hottest topics in our field recently. With a plethora of open source and commercial offerings and a surrounding cacophony of technical terms, however, it is hard for businesses and practitioners to see the forest for the trees.
- Awodey, S. 2010. Category Theory (second edition). Oxford University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baker, J., Bond, C., Corbett, J., Furman, J., Khorlin, A., Larson, J., et al. 2011. Megastore: providing scalable, highly available storage for interactive services. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR).Google Scholar
- Bird, R. 1987. An introduction to the theory of lists. In Logic Programming and Calculi of Discrete Design, ed. M. Broy, 3-42. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Codd, T. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Copeland, G., Maier, D. 1984. Making Smalltalk a database system. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fokkinga, M. 2008. MapReduce¿a two-page explanation for laymen; http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~fokkinga/mmf2008j.pdf.Google Scholar
- Ghosh, R. A. 2005. An economic basis for open standards; flosspols.org.Google Scholar
- Grust, T. 2003. Monad comprehensions: a versatile representation for queries. In The Functional Approach to Data Management, eds. P. Gray, L. Kerschberg, P. King, and A. Poulovassilis, 288-311. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Grust, T., Rittinger, J., Schreiber, T. 2010. Avalanche-safe LINQ compilation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 3(1-2). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meijer, E. 2010. Subject/Observer is dual to iterator. Presented at FIT: Fun Ideas and Thoughts at the Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation; http://www.cs.stanford.edu/pldi10/fit.html.Google Scholar
- Meijer, E., Beckman, B., Bierman, G. 2006. LINQ: reconciling objects, relations, and XML in the .NET framework. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pirayoff, R. 2004. Economics Micro & Macro. Cliffs Notes.Google Scholar
- Pritchett, D. 2008. BASE: an Acid alternative. ACM Queue (July). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stonebraker, M., Hellerstein, J. M. 2005. What goes around comes around. In Readings in Database Systems (Fourth Edition), eds. M. Stonebraker, and J. M. Hellerstein, 2-41. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Yuan Yu, M. I. 2008. DryadLINQ: a system for general-purpose distributed data-parallel computing using a high-level language. OSDI (Operating Systems Design and Implementation). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A co-Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks: Contrary to popular belief, SQL and noSQL are really just two sides of the same coin.
Recommendations
A co-relational model of data for large shared data banks
Contrary to popular belief, SQL and noSQL are really just two sides of the same coin.
Non-Relational Databases in Big Data
ICTCS '16: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive StrategiesThese days' Big data is becoming a very essential component for the industries where large volume of data at very high speed is used to solve particular data problems. Generally, big data is first analyzed and then used with other available data in the ...
Comments